Re: CCW bug [SEVERE]

2014-11-01 Thread James Qiu
Try to give Eclipse more memory like this: eclipse.exe -vm e:\jdk8\bin\javaw.exe -vmargs -Xms2048m -Xmx4096m 2014-11-01 13:12 GMT+08:00 Fluid Dynamics a2093...@trbvm.com: On Saturday, November 1, 2014 12:09:33 AM UTC-4, Dylan Butman wrote: Is it hard to actually send the log? Are you

Re: Deterministic Randomness in Functional Clojure

2014-11-01 Thread Laurens Van Houtven
Hi Isaac, On 01 Nov 2014, at 05:19, Isaac Karth isaacka...@gmail.com wrote: Laurens, Using a PRF actually sounds very close to ideal for what I was looking for. If I can convert a map (or record) to a reproducible seed, and have that be independant from other random checks, that's pretty

Re: io/writer + map/recur

2014-11-01 Thread Thomas Heller
The way you wrote your loop it will only ever run once which means you could take it out. 1 res = take from queue 2 if res nil? terminate 3 if res recur with result from with-open (always nil) 4 back to 2 and terminate Not sure if this is intended but the way it is written it does not make

Re: Deterministic Randomness in Functional Clojure

2014-11-01 Thread Mars0i
On Friday, October 31, 2014 11:19:19 PM UTC-5, Isaac Karth wrote: Looks like if I want to use libraries like clojure.data.generators or bigml.sampling I'd need to amend the random generators to replace calls to the Mersenne Twister function or (def ^:dynamic *rnd* (java.util.Random.

Re: CCW bug [SEVERE]

2014-11-01 Thread Alex Miller
This thread needs to end, it's no longer productive. Fluid Dynamics - file a ticket for CCW with information useful for addressing the problem if you have it. Otherwise, I do not think there is anything left that anyone can help you with here. Everyone else - thank your for all the helpful

Re: multimethod, record, type, and protocol pitfalls?

2014-11-01 Thread Daniel Higginbotham
Thanks for the responses! This is very helpful. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To

Re: On Testing

2014-11-01 Thread Alex Miller
It would be great if someone could enumerate more explicitly what better test output means. What are the specific problems in the current test output reporting? Similar problem list for test runner might be useful. Discussion here is fine but ultimately needs to land on a design wiki page. I

Re: On Testing

2014-11-01 Thread Ashton Kemerling
I can say for certain that at a minimum better indentation of data structures to the console would be a must, a vector with 4+ hash maps in it are currently unreadable and I have to copy to an editor to indent and analyze.  Beyond that, I can imagine the need for a structural diff that tells

Re: On Testing

2014-11-01 Thread Brian Marick
On Nov 1, 2014, at 1:58 PM, Alex Miller a...@puredanger.com wrote: It would be great if someone could enumerate more explicitly what better test output means. What are the specific problems in the current test output reporting? If there's any sort of consensus about test reporting,

Re: On Testing

2014-11-01 Thread Alex Miller
Additionally, I think it would be helpful to enumerate example (failing) tests and their output by current clojure.test. On Saturday, November 1, 2014 1:58:32 PM UTC-5, Alex Miller wrote: It would be great if someone could enumerate more explicitly what better test output means. What are

Re: On Testing

2014-11-01 Thread Devin Walters
http://jakemccrary.com/blog/2014/06/22/comparing-clojure-testing-libraries-output/ has some good examples. I'm currently using humane-test-output. It's worked nicely for me. '(Devin Walters) On Nov 1, 2014, at 7:00 PM, Alex Miller a...@puredanger.com wrote: Additionally, I think it would