The front page of this group shows no unread threads to me, but shows a (1)
next to Google Groups in the page title. So there's one topic with unread
posts, but I can't get the interface to show it to me. I've tried refresh,
shift-refresh, and navigate-away-and-back. I'm sure I haven't done
I recently posted in mistake and deleted the post. Perhaps that is causing what
you are seeing.
- Mike
On Aug 4, 2015, at 10:09 AM, Fluid Dynamics a2093...@trbvm.com wrote:
The front page of this group shows no unread threads to me, but shows a (1)
next to Google Groups in the page title.
Hi all,
I've looked at the Optional Self-hosting section on the ClojureScript Github
wiki. Would it be possible to have a more step-by-step set of instructions for
experimentig with self hosting OR could someone point me to a resource which
provides one?
Thanks,
Kinley
--
You received this
Clojure only supports long and double primitives as function hints. You are
using int; it didn't work with pre-1.8.0 clojure.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts
On 3 August 2015 at 23:47, Rob Lally rob.la...@gmail.com wrote:
I’m also a little confused by your suggestion that it would be impossible
to enclose each test in a transaction. The article you point to shows one
way.
It shows how to pass data to the test by using a dynamic var, which is what
Planck is a self-contained bootstrapped ClojureScript REPL for OS X.
http://planck.fikesfarm.com http://planck.fikesfarm.com/
Planck is now available via Homebrew:
http://blog.fikesfarm.com/posts/2015-08-04-pour-a-pint-of-planck.html
Planck 1.3 is now available via Homebrew:
http://blog.fikesfarm.com/posts/2015-08-04-pour-a-pint-of-planck.html
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new
We're happy to announce version 0.7.0 of the Onyx Platform. This release of
Onyx features a massive jump in performance with the integration of the new
peer-to-peer library Aeron. Additionally, we've begun to open the door for
cross language support into Java.
Blog
post:
There is some weirdeness going on with the new release.
Compare:
Clojure 1.7.0
user= (def foo String)
#'user/foo
user= (defn ^{:tag foo} a [])
#'user/a
with
Clojure 1.8.0-master-SNAPSHOT
user= (def foo String)
#'user/foo
user= (defn ^{:tag foo} a [])
CompilerException
wonder how much need/interest is out there for better support for
clojure/clojurescript editing in atom. i suppose doing an integration of
cider-nrepl and/or refactor-nrepl would not be too hard for advanced editing
features/experience. opinions welcome!
--
You received this message because
Hi Clojure people,
I'm currently working on some problems in the big data space, and I'm more
or less starting from scratch with the Hadoop ecosystem. I was looking at
ways to work with data in Hadoop, and I realized that (because of how
InputFormat splitting works) this is a use case where
Thank you for your answers.
I think now I understand it.
It makes sense that it's a maker interface.
I was confused from the fact that List supports O(1) but it is, of course,
possible in actual implementations.
Regards.
Keisuke
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 5:40 AM, Raymond Huang
Hello,
I've been investigating the basic data structures and their underlying
concepts in Clojure, particularly focusing on the definitions of coll, seq,
map, vector, set, etc. and their inclusion relationships.
I saw a Venn diagram in this page[1]. Although it is as of Clojure 1.3, I
confirmed
If I'm remember correctly, the Counted interface must only be implemented
by collection implementations for which it is guaranteed that count() is an
O(~1) operation
2015-08-04 17:07 GMT+02:00 Keisuke Fukuda keisukefuk...@gmail.com:
Hello,
I've been investigating the basic data structures and
I don't know of it is correct, but I also remember reading that Counted was
a marker interface, i.e. it does not actually add any method but it
implies that the count operation will be fast.
On Tuesday, 4 August 2015, Laurent PETIT laurent.pe...@gmail.com wrote:
If I'm remember correctly, the
I think 1.8.0-alpha4 addresses this issue? Can you verify?
On Wednesday, July 29, 2015 at 8:23:16 PM UTC-5, Mikera wrote:
Hi Alex,
1.8.0-alpha3 is breaking core.matrix at the moment.
Root cause appears to be related to how protocols are being handled when
used with Java arrays:
e.g.
That sounds about right.
See
https://github.com/clojure/clojure/blob/41af6b24dd5be8bd62dc2b463bc53b55e18cd1e5/src/jvm/clojure/lang/Counted.java
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Gary Verhaegen gary.verhae...@gmail.com
wrote:
I don't know of it is correct, but I also remember reading that
17 matches
Mail list logo