Re: [ANN] mixfix syntax for clojure

Cool library, only a small comment id rather that it didn't use the clojure.tools ns (an official ns) On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 3:07:04 PM UTC+3, David Larsson wrote: > > I totally agree. I will keep this library in the back of my head! > > On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 12:52:46

Re: Beginning Clojure Development

A coworker of mine asked me for suggestions yesterday after starting directly with Joy of Clojure as if it were an intro text for himself and getting lost after getting halfway through. Even though this coworker of mine is pretty experienced over many years -- and has programmed in C++, Java,

Re: Beginning Clojure Development

This was a great resource to me, as were the other LispCast videos. I found them easy to follow, and really helped me think about things from first principles, which are really important to understand the idioms. http://www.purelyfunctional.tv/intro-to-clojure On Sep 10, 2015, at 9:02 AM,

Re: [ANN] mixfix syntax for clojure

oki, I wasn't sure myself, I'll change ns in the next version, I've been using mostly Haskell before, and there it is ok to use namespace prefixes from base, the idea was to highlight it is development tool четверг, 10 сентября 2015 г., 14:58:39 UTC+3 пользователь ronen написал: > > Cool

Re: Beginning Clojure Development

maybe this is helpful to beginners: Clojure By Example: https://kimh.github.io/clojure-by-example/ Marcus Blankenship 于2015年9月11日周五 上午12:08写道： > This was a great resource to me, as were the other LispCast videos. I > found them easy to follow, and really helped me think

Re: Beginning Clojure Development

All the above suggestions are good. In addition, I've learned a lot by doing the problems at 4clojure.com. BUT after you solve a problem, the real learning starts. You then get access to other people's solutions. (You get to choose whose answers get listed, and some of the best programmers are

Re: Beginning Clojure Development

Many people say that the *Joy of Clojure* is best for fine details and all that, and there's something right about that claim. However, *Clojure Programming* covers some fine details that *Joy *doesn't even mention, even in the 2nd edition (e.g. important aspects of Java interop). I suspect