Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.9.0-alpha5

Also non-scientific: I personally use BigInteger a fair amount, but have never needed to use BigDecimal. On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 9:41 PM, wrote: > As a completely non-scientific data point, we had precisely one place in > our 30k+ lines of code where we can use bigdec? And

RE: [ANN] Clojure 1.9.0-alpha5

As a completely non-scientific data point, we had precisely one place in our 30k+ lines of code where we can use bigdec? And there is also precisely one place we could use biginteger?  Sean Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org From: Alex Miller -- You

RE: [ANN] Clojure 1.9.0-alpha5

Thanks Alex. Based on what crossclj.info shows, I suspect you may be right that almost no one cares  https://crossclj.info/fun/clojure.core.incubator/seqable?.html Sean Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org From: Alex Miller -- You received this message

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.9.0-alpha5

I don't know that anyone cares much, but I have done a new release of core.incubator (0.1.4) and deprecated seqable?. On Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:21:34 PM UTC-5, Sean Corfield wrote: > > An excellent set of new predicates – thank you! > > > > Will clojure.core.incubator get a new release to

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.9.0-alpha5

Not sure, I can ask. I think BigDecimal is probably used way more than BigInteger. On Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 8:52:36 PM UTC-5, Sean Corfield wrote: > > Whilst updating our code, I noticed there’s bigdec? to test for > java.math.BigDecimal but not bigint? or biginteger? > > > > Is there a

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.9.0-alpha5

Whilst updating our code, I noticed there’s bigdec? to test for java.math.BigDecimal but not bigint? or biginteger? Is there a specific reason for that omission or were those just missed? Sean Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ "If you're not annoying

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.9.0-alpha5

The taoensso.encore issue has defeated my attempts so far to create a repro case. Kevin Downey also confirmed that the straightforward cases of using Encore with 1.9.0 Alpha 5 all seem to work. I worked around the issue so we can continue testing Alpha 5 at World Singles (lifting a defn out of

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.9.0-alpha5

I ran across it because CongoMongo uses it and we use that. It’s not a big deal. Taoensso.encore is more problematic since that is essentially broken by the addition of bytes? to clojure.core. Right now that’s blocking us from upgrading but I haven’t established a workaround yet (technically

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.9.0-alpha5

crossclj.info lists 63 projects with core.incubator as a dependency. Not sure how widely used those projects are themselves: https://crossclj.info/ns/org.clojure/core.incubator/0.1.3/project.clj.html Andy On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Alex Miller wrote: > I'm not

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.9.0-alpha5

Pedestal: https://github.com/pedestal/pedestal/blob/master/service/project.clj#L26 On Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 2:01:41 PM UTC-5, Alex Miller wrote: > > I'm not opposed to it but can't say that's anywhere on my priority list. > Does anyone use incubator? > > > On Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:21:34

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.9.0-alpha5

I'm not opposed to it but can't say that's anywhere on my priority list. Does anyone use incubator? On Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:21:34 PM UTC-5, Sean Corfield wrote: > > An excellent set of new predicates – thank you! > > > > Will clojure.core.incubator get a new release to reflect that

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.9.0-alpha5

An excellent set of new predicates – thank you! Will clojure.core.incubator get a new release to reflect that seqable? is available in core? WARNING: seqable? already refers to: #'clojure.core/seqable? in namespace: clojure.core.incubator, being replaced by:

[ANN] Clojure 1.9.0-alpha5

Clojure 1.9.0-alpha5 is now available. Try it via - Download: https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/clojure/clojure/1.9.0-alpha5 - Leiningen: [org.clojure/clojure "1.9.0-alpha5"] 1.9.0-alpha4 includes the following changes since

Re: clojure.spec - Rich on the Cognicast

Excellent, thanks for letting us know, Alex. On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Alex Miller wrote: > The Cognicast that was just released is Rich talking about clojure.spec so > some people might be interested: > > http://blog.cognitect.com/cognicast/103 > > -- > You received

clojure.spec - Rich on the Cognicast

The Cognicast that was just released is Rich talking about clojure.spec so some people might be interested: http://blog.cognitect.com/cognicast/103 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to

Re: Is there any desire or need for a Clojure DataFrame? (X-POST from Numerical Clojure mailing list)

Hi. I'm experimenting with Renjin interop - in particular, trying to make a Renjin objects implement core.matrix protocols (as mikera suggested). I hope to be able to share some draft soon. then ask your opinions about it. Hi. I'm experimenting with Renjin interop - in particular, trying