Not all intermediates appear because in between your completed swap! and your
log (really the deref of the atom) the value in the atom changed.
You are using atoms correctly. Your swap! function would me more idiomatic if
it used the threading macro (->) but otherwise is fine.
If you really nee
I don't know what I did wrong here.
I wanted to build an accuracy test for some search matching code we wrote.
We match text using things like Levenshtein distance and Jaro-Winkler
scores. These parameters can be fine-tuned, so I wrote a small app that
fires 10 million requests at our search m
ClojureScript, the Clojure compiler that emits JavaScript source code.
README and source code: https://github.com/clojure/clojurescript
Leiningen dependency information:
[org.clojure/clojurescript "1.9.473"]
This is a bugfix release.
As always, feedback welcome!
## Fixes
* CLJS-1931: Closure
Perfect - that’s exactly what I’m looking for. Thanks!
-Matt
On February 9, 2017 at 4:04:17 PM, Gary Fredericks (fredericksg...@gmail.com)
wrote:
Wrapping the generator in `gen/no-shrink` will give you a generator that
pretends it doesn't know how to shrink.
On Thursday, February 9, 2017 at 11
Hey, thanks, I like your idea of utilizing closure as poor's man object (or
vice versa if you like :) ) to encapsulate
particular validators.
However, one note is that I was opting for a more dynamism/flexibility like
simply associating field
with set of arbitrary composed set of validators. B
Hi All,
I've just released a new version of durable-ref to clojars, available as
[riverford/durable-ref "0.1.2].
Since my last ANN I have added:
- `atomic` references, with a reference dynamodb implementatino plus
extension points.
- `nippy` storage format using the high performance taoensso/n
