Re: [ANN] Insn: Functional JVM bytecode generation for Clojure.

2017-08-18 Thread Colin Fleming
This looks very interesting. How would you compare this to Mage for the CLR? Are they essentially equivalent? On 19 August 2017 at 11:49, wrote: > Insn is a data-oriented API to the ASM JVM bytecode > generation library. It also provides additional

[ANN] Insn: Functional JVM bytecode generation for Clojure.

2017-08-18 Thread jgpc42
Insn is a data-oriented API to the ASM JVM bytecode generation library. It also provides additional utilities like generating Clojure fns built from bytecode. Much more information is available at the github page: https://github.com/jgpc42/insn -- You received this

RE: Is Clojure victim of Spec ?

2017-08-18 Thread Sean Corfield
I’ll do my usual “We’re using in production and it’s fine!” post. We’ve had 1.9.0-alpha17 in production for a while now. Zero problems. We’re also using clojure.spec.alpha very heavily in production (for REST API parameter validation and coercion, mostly), as well as development/testing (to

Is Clojure victim of Spec ?

2017-08-18 Thread Alex Miller
Spec has been split out of Clojure so that we can release 1.9 without gating on spec. It's hard to see at the moment, but moving 1.9 towards release is my top priority right now and we are moving towards beta. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Is Clojure victim of Spec ?

2017-08-18 Thread Gary Trakhman
I consider Clojure 1.9-alpha16 reasonably stable and not significantly more full-featured than 1.8. Is there any risk to using it, or any harm from staying on 1.8? In the past, conversations have come up about clojure's relative stability in alpha versions compared to people's perceptions of

Re: Is Clojure victim of Spec ?

2017-08-18 Thread Timothy Baldridge
Relevant discussion: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/clojure/10dbF7w2IQo/ec37TzP5AQAJ On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Rafik NACCACHE wrote: > Hey guys, > > Seems to be a long while we are waiting for 1.9 > > I kinda feel that core.spec seems to always need more

Is Clojure victim of Spec ?

2017-08-18 Thread Rafik NACCACHE
Hey guys, Seems to be a long while we are waiting for 1.9 I kinda feel that core.spec seems to always need more polishing so that's why it's still being delayed... Am I right ? -- [image: --] Rafik Naccache [image: https://]about.me/rafik_naccache

Re: Entity–component–system and Clojure

2017-08-18 Thread joinr
Didier, I think your synopsis is right on the mark. I shifted from the canonical class-based data model for entities (primarily for discrete event simulation, with applications to games) toward a functional ECS approach a while back - even before I found clojure in 2010. The biggest utilities