Excellent! This is a great way of making code fail-fast for a class of
bugs that would normally only occur under load (i.e. at the worst
possible time).
--Dave Griffith
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
(defn frequencies [coll]
(reduce (fn [map val] (assoc map val (if (contains map val)
(get map val) 1)) #{})
)
On Dec 11, 9:21 am, bOR_ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I thought I remembered there was a method in the api somewhere that
> would count the frequency of each uniq
Since it requires changes to the Clojure runtime, it probably doesn't
make much sense to put it in contrib. I've posted it as an attachment
to the group.
--Dave Griffith
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to
nd is perfectly fine, although it looks like
exposing a method in LockingTransaction would be more performant.
--Dave Griffith
On Dec 8, 6:07 pm, Stuart Halloway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> It looks like LockingTransaction.getRunning would need to be made
> publ
prohibitted in transactions, but questions were raised as
to whether there was any way to actually prevent it. Looking through
the API, I couldn't find any way of detecting when execution was
occuring in a transactional context or not.
--Dave Gri
used for
production purposes. Contents may have settled during shipping. All
models over 18.
Where should I send the patch?
--Dave Griffith
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" grou
--- On Sun, 12/7/08, Michael Wood wrote:
> Is there an explanation that's a little smaller than 607MB?
The slides and the code?
Dave
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure"
threading/concurrency.
That's just my impression; you'll get far more definitive answers than this.
Dave
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group,
or files and/or commands you're using?
Like get the classpath via:
> echo %CLASSPATH%
I'm reasonably sure it shouldn't be trying to load a Main-Class from the
contrib jar, so I suspect the classpath is not being set properly.
Dave
--~--~-~--~~~
--- On Sat, 12/6/08, Julian Morrison wrote:
> A wrapper for neo4j, which is a non-relational database
> using [...] traversable relationships.
Hey, wait...
Dave
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
d to "run clojure." [...]
Plus I'm pretty suspicious of that semicolon.
Dave
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@google
> Maybe if the external commit
> can be delayed until the end of the transaction, when it is certain
> that the in-memory operations succeeded, it could work. I think this
> is the most promising way of implementing this.
This was my plan. As near as I can tell, the current STM
implementation co
ld be pretty easy to extend
the STM with features like timeouts and such.
Thoughts? Am I missing anything? Has this already been attempted in
some way I was unable to google for? My temptation is to try to
implement something as a quick spike and
elicensed as Apache 2.0.I don't know if that's
something you might be interested in eventually, but it's something to
think about. It's early days for Clojure, but who knows what the
future might bring.
Dave Griffith
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You re
o be the same.
A Sun v. Sun comparison? What about JDK/JVM implementations from different
vendors?
Dave
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to
One big issue to note is that, because of Refs, Clojure agent
semantics can't simply be remoted the way Erlang processes can be.
This is because a message send could include a references to a Ref,
thus exposing mutable state remotely. This breaks, well, just about
everything.
If you restrict th
nd Polyglot [2]
compilers have been used to produce some pretty fun Java extensions, although
none so fun as Roman numerals. 269 just provides an official way to abuse the
compiler ;)
Dave
[1] http://jastadd.cs.lth.se/web/extjava/index.shtml
[2] http://www.cs.cornell.edu/pro
the chaff--I'm actually not in favor of completely
unrestricted access to the wiki.
Dave
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@go
--- On Tue, 11/18/08, joejoe wrote:
> Yeah I got so fed up with trying to do it I
> almost gave up, then I found the (reverse string).
That doesn't actually do what your spec said, though.
Dave
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message beca
of the cloject; me likey.
> - clojury
> - openjure
- Nondisclojure (Stealth Clojure projects in Java houses)
- 4LeafClojure (it's good luck, top o' the mornin' to ye)
- Code4Clojure
- SeekingClojure
Dave
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
g guy steele just sat down next to me"
and my friend (he's young) texted back "cool ask him who guy steele is".
Dave
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure&q
Another flaw may be corrected if invokedynamic or similar gets implemented in a
shipping version.)
'Nuff said. It seems like our time could be better spent doing something else;
the horse has been sufficiently beaten.
Dave
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
s of problems getting things to
work, although I've been doing a lot of Java lately, and more Scheme than CL,
so that may have helped.
I'm sure other folks would also be interested in your contributions towards a
CL => Clojure document; sounds like a good opportunity.
Dave
---
lity of being a list of (expected to be) equal
pairs.
That's probably just me, I'm sure, but I find the original more readable and
precise--something I think is key in tests, as tests are also documentation.
Dave
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received th
is context
In which environment/build? It's working fine for me.
Dave
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.co
vely recently that we're seeing similarly-functional
non-Lisp/Smalltalk IDEs.
> If it's only brevity that you're after then aget
> could be abbreviated still, I guess: ag anyone?
There's "terse", and there's "concise". I know
ur own (stringish? ...) function then--since Clojure is
strongly Java-interop returning a T for a non-String would make (string? ...)
seem less useful, but that's just my opinion.
Dave
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribe
=> (string? (new java.lang.StringBuilder "hello"))
> false
Wouldn't it be a StringBuilder, not a String?
user=> (. (new java.lang.StringBuilder "hello") getClass)
#=java.lang.StringBuilder
user=> (string? (. (new java.lang.StringBuilder "hello") toString
t it be a StringBuilder, and not a String?
user=> (. (new java.lang.StringBuilder "hello") getClass)
#=java.lang.StringBuilder
user=> (string? (. (new java.lang.StringBuilder "hello") toString))
true
Dave
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You receiv
701 - 729 of 729 matches
Mail list logo
