Looks nice and short to me. Again I don't have the time to ponder
optimizations so I'm curious myself how it could be made faster.
David
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Adam Clements adam.cleme...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi, so I chose this problem as my first foray into core.logic too
My solution
Yeah that's not how partial maps work are intended to be used, though it's
not very clear - Philip Potter actually brought up a good criticism of the
behavior of partial maps at ClojureX in London when I gave a quick
demonstration - you lose transitivity. I'm inclined to push the
functionality of
Oh to answer your question - expecting two separate unifications to
change a var defeats the spirit of logic programming - you're back to
something stateful.
That said the framework is probably laid well enough to implement CLP(Map).
I don't have any time to do such a thing but I can explain how
and it will be considered.
David
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 1:56 PM, JvJ kfjwhee...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a list of features that you'd like to implement that core.logic
doesn't have yet?
On Tuesday, 11 December 2012 00:52:24 UTC-5, David Nolen wrote:
core.logic is still pretty young
Oh and of course AND and OR parallelism.
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 5:44 PM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
There's not a list of features so much as a list of improvements I would
like to make. Some medium to big project ideas:
- CLP(Set)
- Improvements to tabling (currently a lot
core.logic is still pretty young - some (many?) Prolog niceties may not be
present. Don't know until you try ;)
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 12:29 AM, JvJ kfjwhee...@gmail.com wrote:
I have some code that uses Prolog, but I want to get rid of the native
dependencies inherent in SWI Prolog/JPL.
I chimed in on the patch. Taking Brenton's approach sounds like it would be
significantly simpler and require a very small patch to lein-cljsbuild.
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Mimmo Cosenza mimmo.cose...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Evan,
Brenton Ashworth said that this kind of options should not
Congrats! :)
David
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant
abonnaireserge...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
Very pleased to have handed in my final honours dissertation today. Thanks
to all that submitted corrections and offered encouragement.
/bmillare/dj/usr/src/minimal/clojurescript/lib/goog.jar!/goog/net/xpc/nativemessagingtransport.js
line 26 : 0
On Monday, December 3, 2012 7:50:11 PM UTC-5, David Nolen wrote:
Please create a minimal project that demonstrates the issue for you, then
we can try to run that.
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12
Don't call your file repl.* this has special meaning - it's the file that's
meant to be loaded into the cross page iframe.
On Monday, December 3, 2012, Brent Millare wrote:
I've already tried both ways. Creating the html file with the script tag
with the simple code you showed, and just simply
view.html. repl is the name of the response from the call (repl/connect
http://localhost:9000/repl;)
On Monday, December 3, 2012 3:29:13 PM UTC-5, David Nolen wrote:
Don't call your file repl.* this has special meaning - it's the file
that's meant to be loaded into the cross page iframe
[] (clojure.browser.repl/connect http://localhost:9000/repl;))
hence, the url is like
file:///home/.../out/view.html
Again only the error message says repl:3
On Monday, December 3, 2012 4:29:43 PM UTC-5, David Nolen wrote:
It sounds like you are trying to navigate to
http://localhost:9000/replthough
the call to connect works.
On Monday, December 3, 2012 6:22:24 PM UTC-5, David Nolen wrote:
file:// urls don't work anymore due to changes in the Google Closure
Library. You need to point your browser to http://localhost:9000/, by
default it looks for index.html.
David
--
You received
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Jonas jonas.enl...@gmail.com wrote:
* Predicates on logic vars:
[(foo (? x number?)) (bar ?x)] = match (foo 42) but not (foo :bar)
This is now possible since we have constraints.
* Segment vars:
[(* ??x 1 ??y) (* ??x ??y)] = (* 4 3 2 1 2 3 4)
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Jonas jonas.enl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, December 2, 2012 7:33:17 PM UTC+2, David Nolen wrote:
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Jonas jonas@gmail.com wrote:
* Predicates on logic vars:
[(foo (? x number?)) (bar ?x)] = match (foo 42
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 2:11 AM, Evan Mezeske emeze...@gmail.com wrote:
That said what's the compelling reason these days for lein-cljsbuild to
depend on a specific version of ClojureScript? Are you relying on certain
aspects of the analyzer or compiler's API and find that they change quite
Can we move forward on this? Option 1 seems best to me. That said what's
the compelling reason these days for lein-cljsbuild to depend on a specific
version of ClojureScript? Are you relying on certain aspects of the
analyzer or compiler's API and find that they change quite frequently?
On Fri,
closures inside the body of a function are not free in JS. I would lift
those helpers out. In general I see no benefit to writing your fast code
in JS - all the facilities for writing efficient code are available in
ClojureScript itself. I agree that it's not completely clear what subset of
Oh though before you lift them out by hand - I would double check that
:simple optimizations doesn't already do this for you :)
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 1:25 AM, Frank Siebenlist
frank.siebenl...@gmail.com wrote:
I need UUIDs in my CLJS code…
cljs.core does include a UUID type, but no
at the repl without any
optimization so far…
-FS.
On Nov 29, 2012, at 8:36 AM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh though before you lift them out by hand - I would double check that
:simple optimizations doesn't already do this for you :)
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 1:25 AM, Frank
I think you need to make sure that the cljs files are also on the Lein 2
:source-paths
David
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Sean Grove s...@cloudfuji.com wrote:
I've been trying to create a simple project with CLJS source and CLJS
tests using lein-cljsbuild 0.2.9, but it doesn't seem to
-profile :as zup]))
Any other ideas?
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:24 AM, David Nolen
dnolen.li...@gmail.comjavascript:;
wrote:
I think you need to make sure that the cljs files are also on the Lein 2
:source-paths
David
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Sean Grove
s
It's definitely possible. I've been to meaning to merge some experimental
work I've done creating a Node.js ClojureScript REPL in hopes that some one
would be willing to take it further.
David
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Krukow karl.kru...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a special
.
On Nov 27, 2012, at 1:32 PM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
It's definitely possible. I've been to meaning to merge some
experimental work I've done creating a Node.js ClojureScript REPL in hopes
that some one would be willing to take it further.
David
On Tue, Nov 27
Yep infd's api is a bit annoying - I'd like to change it to match
distinctfd.
David
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Frederik De Bleser
frede...@burocrazy.comwrote:
I had some trouble because all goals need to take in the list of lvars.
`infd` doesn't take in a list, but your sudoku blog
You can do something like the following:
(run [q]
(let [vars (repeatedly some-n lvar)]
(all
(== q vars
functional programming FTW ;)
David
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Frederik De Bleser frede...@burocrazy.com
wrote:
Using core.logic, I sometimes have the need to
`gensym` doesn't create logic vars, `lvar` does. Use `lvar` not `gensym`.
David
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Frederik De Bleser frede...@burocrazy.com
wrote:
Hey David,
I don't quite understand how I would apply your suggestion this with my
example.
1. So the all function creates a
keywords symbols as proper types is probably not far off and optimizing
them doesn't need to wait for a general whole program optimization strategy.
David
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Herwig Hochleitner
hhochleit...@gmail.comwrote:
Encoding Keywords as Strings is a performance
will be obfuscated away).
That's the basic sketch I have in mind.
David
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Herwig Hochleitner
hhochleit...@gmail.comwrote:
2012/11/26 David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com
keywords symbols as proper types is probably not far off and optimizing
them doesn't need to wait
You can use `aget` for that.
(aget object someProperty)
David
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Krukow karl.kru...@gmail.com wrote:
Continuing my exploration of ClojureScript.. I'm writing a small query
language. The syntax consists of data structures like
[:button {:name Login}]
In
Another interesting approach would be real compiler support for promises so
we can get something closer to Clojure JVM semantics. This would require
someone to get a bit more serious about the CLJS AST and related
infrastructure for pluggable passes.
David
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Frank
WOW! Awesome :)
David
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Baishampayan Ghose b.gh...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I was checking out the new GoPanda2 client for IGS (Internet Go Server)
and I was pleasantly surprised to discover that the app is actually written
in Clojure ClojureScript -
Agreed. Patches welcome!
On Saturday, November 24, 2012, Dave Sann wrote:
Is there a plan to add these?
It seems like a step towards more generic exception handling between clj
and cljs code.
Dave
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure
ClojureScript dev is actively working towards Clojure sans JVM.
On Saturday, November 24, 2012, Leon Adler wrote:
Hi,
JVM is known to be a robust, reliable and optimised platform for
development and deployment. Rich Hicky's decision to develop Clojure on the
JVM is fantastic, and it's
Nope.
On Saturday, November 24, 2012, Laurent PETIT wrote:
You probably meant towards ClojureScript sans JVM ;-)
2012/11/25 David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com javascript:;:
ClojureScript dev is actively working towards Clojure sans JVM.
On Saturday, November 24, 2012, Leon Adler wrote
targetting the JVM without
that being an implementation detail ? :-)
2012/11/25 David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com:
Nope.
On Saturday, November 24, 2012, Laurent PETIT wrote:
You probably meant towards ClojureScript sans JVM ;-)
2012/11/25 David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com
core.logic has lazy-run.
On Thursday, November 22, 2012, Jim foo.bar wrote:
Hi all,
this question may sound stupid but I've got to ask it
given a fn like the one below, how would one make it lazy (assuming that
it can be done)?
also if it can, I'd like to make it fully-lazy (instead of
If someone creates a patch for this I'll happily apply it.
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Giacomo Cosenza mimmo.cose...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to add a new feature to both cljsbuild and clojurescript to allow
the exclusion of some cljs source from being compiled. the motivation
Great. Be sure to send your CA if you haven't already.
This should be a fairly simple patch to closure.clj.
David
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Giacomo Cosenza
mimmo.cose...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi David,
I'll work on it next days.
Thanks
mimmo
On Nov 20, 2012, at 5:06 PM, David Nolen
connectOptions ) (fn [] (js/console.log failure
Connect)))
If you need any more info please let me know.
Thomas
On Tuesday, November 20, 2012 4:07:12 PM UTC, David Nolen wrote:
What does your ClojureScript code look like?
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Thomas th.van...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I think ClojureScript will be pretty closely tied to Clojure development
for the foreseeable future. 1.5.0 has column data which is critical for
accurate source mapping for example.
Feature Expressions can't come soon enough, fingers crossed for 1.6.0.
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 1:39 PM, László
What is the error under simple optimizations? Errors under advanced
optimizations are not particularly informative :)
Thanks
On Saturday, November 17, 2012, Paul Gearon wrote:
Looking at the Clojurescript page on Github I can't find the appropriate
place to ask about potential bugs unless
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 9:53 AM, MHOOO thomas.karol...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everybody,
recently I was using the following pattern a lot, in order to get access
to a value inside a map:
(defn map-geto* [m k v]
(matche [m]
([[[k v] . _]])
([[_ . tail]]
There's no way to make that work currently. Whether it should work requires
some discussion but at the moment I'm inclined to say no.
On Wednesday, November 14, 2012, David Jagoe wrote:
Hi all,
I have a core.match pattern that looks something like this:
(def !nil? (complement nil?))
Macros. Metadata is a perfect way to annotate symbols that need to be
processed in some specific way or to provide extra information when
debugging. Many serious macros I've written use metadata on forms symbols.
David
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Takahiro Hozumi
You could do: (.call f context ...)
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Frank Siebenlist frank.siebenl...@gmail.com
wrote:
In Javascript you seem to be able to set the context for this to any
fn-object by specifying your desired context's this in the call/apply
call.
(never knew about this
Typed Clojure Hackathon at the Conj?! ;)
David
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant
abonnaireserge...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, if you'd like to contribute to Typed Clojure, there are a lot of
small, fun jobs around.
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Anthony Rosequist
anthony.rosequ...@gmail.com wrote:
I updated my gist with a solution that's working:
https://gist.github.com/3981557
Unfortunately, I had to copy my conde expression 3 times (to cover all
combinations of the three tasks). So, what I
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Anthony Rosequist
anthony.rosequ...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm playing around with core.logic, and have this code so far:
https://gist.github.com/3981557
There are 2 people and 3 tasks. Each task has a start time (you can't
start the task until this time or
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Anthony Rosequist
anthony.rosequ...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm playing around with core.logic, and have this code so far:
https://gist.github.com/3981557
It might help to understand exactly what kind of output were you expecting.
David
--
You received this
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Anthony Rosequist
anthony.rosequ...@gmail.com wrote:
(conde
[(!= person1 person2)]
[(=fd start2 start1) (=fd end2 start1)]
[(=fd end1 start2) (=fd end1 end2)])
Here's a version that at least guarantees that people aren't appearing in
the task list
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 8:19 AM, Tim tram...@gmail.com wrote:
While playing around with a little test website I came across what, I
believe to be a bug in the CLJS compiler. It seems like the generation of
symbols for use in macros (e.g. var#) is broken when compiled into certain
JavaScript
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Brandon Bloom snprbo...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd suspect the specialized solvers provide performance
and predictability tuned to their particular use cases. It's worth noting
is that both components must provide interactive performance. I wonder if
there is some
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Frank Siebenlist
frank.siebenl...@gmail.com wrote:
Bump.
Could someone please confirm that printing from the repl doesn't work
anymore?
Thanks, Frank.
I just checked browser REPL on CLJS master - it works fine for me.
David
--
You received this message
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 8:19 AM, Tim tram...@gmail.com wrote:
While playing around with a little test website I came across what, I
believe to be a bug in the CLJS compiler. It seems like the generation of
symbols for use in macros (e.g. var#) is broken when compiled into certain
JavaScript
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 4:16 AM, Tassilo Horn t...@gnu.org wrote:
Any ideas and pointers how to implement that?
I don't really see anyway to do this without the graph itself being a
relational data structure. I haven't seen any data structure that fits that
bill beyond lists (which of course
Enhancements:
- experimental support for Datomic
- eqfd now supports - /
Fixes:
- distinctfd goal behaved badly if argument wasn't ground
- LOGIC-62: distincto bug reveals much larger issues around how we look up
constraints. because vars can be bound in any order and we use vars to map
to
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Jordan Lewis jordanthele...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I'm new to core.logic and logic programming in general. I tried to write a
small program to generate all permutations of any size for an input list
with unique elements. To start, I hardcoded the input list to
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:27 PM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Jordan Lewis jordanthele...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I'm new to core.logic and logic programming in general. I tried to write
a small program to generate all permutations of any size
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Jordan Lewis jordanthele...@gmail.comwrote:
(run 16 [q] (distincto q) (everyo #(membero % (range 3)) q))
;; returns (() [0] [1] [2] (0 0) (0 1) (1 0) (0 2) (1 1) (2 0) (1 2) (2 1)
(2 2) (0 0 0) (0 0 1) (0 1 0)), incorrect
Ticket created for the distincto bug
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Jordan Lewis jordanthele...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I'm new to core.logic and logic programming in general. I tried to write a
small program to generate all permutations of any size for an input list
with unique elements. To start, I hardcoded the input list to
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:56 PM, nathanmarz nathan.m...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm looking into rewriting Storm's resource scheduler using
core.logic. I want to be able to say constraints like:
1. Topology A's slots should be = 10 and as close to 10 as possible
(minimize the delta between assigned
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 5:17 PM, nathanmarz nathan.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Cool, thanks for the quick response. We'll be looking into this pretty
soon. I ultimately want the logic engine itself being exposed to users
so they can add their own company-specific constraints to resource
scheduling
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Andy Fingerhut andy.finger...@gmail.comwrote:
Nathan:
I don't know core.logic's capabilities, and I haven't looked at the kinds
of constraints you describe in enough detail to say for sure, but my
initial reaction is that linear/integer programming might be a
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Jamie Brandon ja...@scattered-thoughts.net
wrote:
It sounds like something that would benefit from good constraint
propagation. If I remember correctly, core.logic only support
propagating equality/inequality constraints which can be pretty slow
for exploring
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Brian Craft craft.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Does clojurescript have to do full copies on collection types to keep them
immutable? Or is there some nice way to efficiently do immutable objects in
js?
ClojureScript now implements all of Clojure's persistent data
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Frank Siebenlist
frank.siebenl...@gmail.com wrote:
Bump.
Could someone please confirm that printing from the repl doesn't work
anymore?
Thanks, Frank.
In what REPL? Works fine for me using the Rhino one via script/repljs
David
--
You received this
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Frank Siebenlist
frank.siebenl...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry - browser-repl- any browser.
Ah. This is possible given some of the changes around printing. Help
welcome on this one, a bit busy this week.
David
--
You received this message because you are
A related ticket - http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJS-404 if someone
is interested.
Would be grand if we could automate testing the browser REPL to avoid
regressions like this.
David
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Paul deGrandis paul.degran...@gmail.comwrote:
Frank,
Do you have an
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Frank Siebenlist
frank.siebenl...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Paul.
Just wanted a confirmation first that this printing from the browser repl
doesn't work before opening a new issue.
(too many versions and uncommitted changes on my mac - it's a pain trying
to
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Shantanu Kumar kumar.shant...@gmail.comwrote:
On Oct 23, 12:11 am, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Shantanu Kumar
kumar.shant...@gmail.comwrote:
19afb31a52504293ba2182c584b1867917316662
Do you have top
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Max Penet m...@qbits.cc wrote:
This reminds me, maybe having something like this function, probably with
its protocol in core would be nice. Thoughts?
map-js in core? There's no good conversion for arbitrary keys.
David
--
You received this message because
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Shantanu Kumar kumar.shant...@gmail.comwrote:
On Oct 21, 11:21 pm, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Please isolate the commit by using the lein checkouts feature - you can
use
the ClojureScript repo directly then and use git bisect to determine
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Shantanu Kumar kumar.shant...@gmail.comwrote:
19afb31a52504293ba2182c584b1867917316662
Do you have top level lets in your code?
(let [foo ...]
(defn bar ...))
David
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Shantanu Kumar kumar.shant...@gmail.comwrote:
On Oct 23, 12:11 am, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Shantanu Kumar
kumar.shant...@gmail.comwrote:
19afb31a52504293ba2182c584b1867917316662
Do you have top
There is not. That would be useful.
On Saturday, October 20, 2012, Frank Siebenlist wrote:
When you have different versions of clojurescript in the dependencies of
your main project, how do you ask the repl what version it is running with…
is there any easy function/var that I overlooked?
Please isolate the commit by using the lein checkouts feature - you can use
the ClojureScript repo directly then and use git bisect to determine the
exact commit that broke your build. Thanks.
On Sunday, October 21, 2012, Shantanu Kumar wrote:
On Oct 20, 12:52 am, Stuart Sierra
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 2:05 AM, Jiajian Huang analysis...@gmail.comwrote:
I am trying clojurescript right now and when I compiling the node example
on the quick page, an error happens.
* temp : cat nodehello.cljs
(ns nodehello)
(defn -main [ args]
(println (apply str (map [\ world
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 4:52 AM, Henrik Mohr lupos...@gmail.com wrote:
Still I hope someone can answer the question on why ClojureScript behaves
differently from Clojure.
Output from Clojure:
user= (str ø)
*ø*
Output from ClojureScript:
#_= (str ø)
*\xF8*
Output from node.js:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Coen De Roover cdero...@vub.ac.be wrote:
Hi David,
What are your plans about the tables?
I would side with the title of the issue rather than its description :)
I don't have any current plans to further improve the performance of
tabling. The only thing I
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Tamreen Khan histor...@gmail.com wrote:
While Clojurescript aims to be close to Clojure, they're still
different languages, with entirely different compilers. Much of the
Clojure toolchain uses the extension to figure out how to compile a
given file.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:01 PM, JvJ kfjwhee...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure if anyone's done this before, but I'm fed up with writing
code that looks like this:
What problem does this solve given you can do the following?
(let [a 1
_ (println a)
b 2
_ (println b)
c
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:23 PM, JvJ kfjwhee...@gmail.com wrote:
I didn't realize you could bind to empty identifiers like that. Alright,
that makes more sense. I figured I was missing something.
Just to be clear _ has not special meaning beyond convention. I could have
used x but that
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Paul deGrandis paul.degran...@gmail.comwrote:
- thumb through Ring, Leiningen, and ClojureScript as prime examples of
well written Clojure applications
+1
I think it's informative to look at non-trivial yet small Clojure
libraries. ClojureScript doesn't
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Alan Malloy a...@malloys.org wrote:
It's rare to get tired of this, because nobody does it: it's not
common because your interleaved statements are side-effecting only,
which is not encouraged in Clojure, and rarely needed. Certainly
sometimes it's the best
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Grant Rettke gret...@acm.org wrote:
(- ((fn []
(let [a 1]
(println this is a: a)
a)))
((fn [a]
(let [b 2]
(println this is b: b)
(list a b
((fn [[a b]]
(let [c 3]
(println this is c:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Grant Rettke gret...@acm.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Mark Engelberg
mark.engelb...@gmail.com wrote:
Either way works well. I think Evan's way results in somewhat more
compact
code for the common case, whereas Cgrand's way feels a little
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Grant Rettke gret...@acm.org wrote:
When you use def inside a defn is it equivalent to a let binding like this?
(defn foo []
(def a 1)
(println a))
(defn foo []
((fn [a]
(println a)) 1))
Not equivalent.
--
You received this message because
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Grant Rettke gret...@acm.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Grant Rettke gret...@acm.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Mark Engelberg
mark.engelb...@gmail.com wrote:
A def, even inside defn, creates and binds a global variable.
Woa, I
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Herwig Hochleitner
hhochleit...@gmail.comwrote:
2012/10/19 Bruno França dos Reis bfr...@gmail.com
The reason why I wrote a macro instead of a function is because 'get' and
'duplicate' are not declared in any common superclass of the different
buffers, so I
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:14 AM, Dave Sann daves...@gmail.com wrote:
Correct me if I am wrong but, string lookup will cause problems with
advanced compilation - if you are not also setting the property or method
by string name.
That is correct. Doing so would only make sense in the context
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:59 PM, JvJ kfjwhee...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to be able to define facts and functions in a single relation.
For example:
(defrel friends x y)
(facts friends [['Kaylen 'Holly]
['John 'Jim]])
;; Here I want to put something that says
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Reinout Stevens reste...@vub.ac.be wrote:
Another question: is it possible to manually reset the contents of the
tables?
Thanks a lot
Reinout
After some more thinking, I agree that the current behavior is not only
counter intuitive, but simply awful :)
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Herwig Hochleitner
hhochleit...@gmail.comwrote:
Certainly, such a simple optimization (omitting var reads in a statement
context) could live in the emitter.
The next stumbling block to a smaller clojurescript, however, is the
global-hierarchy var, which
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Herwig Hochleitner hhochleit...@gmail.com
wrote:
2012/10/16 David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com
I'm aware of this one as well. But again I think we can and should do a
quick fix in the compiler for this. Either the user used multimethods or
they did
and most Clojure programs avoid it if they can.
I don't think we need any fancy compiler stuff to fix the two big dead code
issues in the near term.
On Tuesday, October 16, 2012, Herwig Hochleitner wrote:
2012/10/16 David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'dnolen.li
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Herwig Hochleitner
hhochleit...@gmail.comwrote:
2012/10/16 David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com
None of the invocation optimizations make any sense for anything other
that advanced optimization.
But the invokations in javascript output work even when
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Herwig Hochleitner
hhochleit...@gmail.comwrote:
The emitter still can not look ahead in its single pass, but thinking
about it, it seems to me your proposal could be implemented by lazily
initializing global-hierachy in derive.
Sounds good!
Please also
Congrats!
On Tuesday, October 16, 2012, Rich Hickey wrote:
I released Clojure 5 years ago today. It's been a terrific ride so far.
Thanks to everyone who contributes to making Clojure, and its community,
great.
Rich
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
It may be worth considering adding an oget to complement aget as was
suggesting during ClojureScript/Lua development.
David
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Evan Mezeske emeze...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm after reading that docstring, /me hopes he didn't just recommend
something for its
601 - 700 of 2038 matches
Mail list logo
