On Oct 5, 2015, at 0545, andrea crotti wrote:
> Any idea how to make this faster?
> Other advices on the code are welcome as well..
Why not generate the the possible left-hand teams and then cartesian product
with the leftover players? E.g., if you want to match 2 on 2 and have players
A B C
On Jul 6, 2015, at 1058, gingersafflo...@gmail.com wrote:
> Sean Corfield,
>
> Thanks for this. I can go through my code and try to remove all of the uses
> of JodaTime in my own code, but, as that would be some work, I'd like to
> first confirm the diagnoses. Can you think of a way I might be
On Jun 5, 2015, at 1505, Dru Sellers wrote:
> Trying to google what #' means is tricky to say the least.
>
> Is there a good name for these that I can google to read up on them?
Good article.
https://yobriefca.se/blog/2014/05/19/the-weird-and-wonderful-characters-of-clojure/
Frank
--
You r
agreement, so the enforceability of the system as a whole can get quite messy.
All I’m saying here: I’m not sure that a court will buy that “if you do X
before this date, I won’t sue you; but then if you do this after Y date, I
will” is a valid license. It’s certainly not the norm.
Frank
Frankli
s directed to publicize the source.
I wrote a bit more about related issues for Mailpile:
http://franksiler.com/on-choosing-open-licenses/
Frank
Franklin M. Siler
Counselor at Law||| franksiler.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clo
On May 4, 2015, at 1546, Kaiyin Zhong wrote:
> Wouldn't be nice to have something like:
See also Swiss Arrows:
https://github.com/rplevy/swiss-arrows
Great article on “hard to Google” forms in Clojure:
https://yobriefca.se/blog/2014/05/19/the-weird-and-wonderful-characters-of-clojure/
Frank`
> On Oct 29, 2014, at 10:28, Fluid Dynamics wrote:
>
> But, you should get a second opinion from a practicing lawyer before
> proceeding, unless the plan is to just "leak" the fan translations
> anonymously in some untraceable way. :)
Practicing lawyer says get t
