I think adding the generic sub-namespaces java, data, algo, tools, etc. is
unnecessary and confusing. How many libraries fit neatly in one of those
categories and not the other? Why use clojure.data.json when clojure.json
would suffice? More examples: clojure.cli, clojure.enlive, clojure.monads
Great site! Clean, simple, and very useful.
There's a missing 'n' at the end of the link to ring-basic-authentication.
The Beta label doesn't mean what it used to mean. Today, it's unflattering
and unnecessary to have it on display.
Thanks for doing this. You're awesome!
--
You received this
Smack is the go to library for XMPP client programming on the JVM. It
has some quirks and annoying bugs, but it's versatile; it mostly
works, and it has excellent (simple!) documentation. Also, there is no
worthy free alternative available.
Docs:
For me as a user, the appeal of contrib was the bundling. I used to
just download the latest contrib jar, throw it in the classpath, and
have plenty of functionality that could be easily summoned using a
single line of code. Just like a standard library, even though it's
not officially standard.
I tried to use Long keys from the java.io.File/length method in a hash-
map and failed to retrieve values using them. sorted-map is fine. The
doc says hash-maps require keys that support .equals and .hashCode.
Doesn't Long support those or am I missing something else?
--
You received this
Do people use the octal number format in Clojure programming (zero on
the left)?
(Have no idea what I'm talking about? You're not alone. Try this at
your REPL: (* 2 010). If you expected to get 20, welcome to the world
of octal numbers.)
It's confusing to read in source code because it's rare,
So far I have delightfully used Clojure's reader-evaluator-printer to
store and load data, as an ad-hoc scripting language and command line
interface, as a configuration language, and as an RPC protocol. It's
all simple and great when those interfaces are trusted.
Now I want to do it with
As far as I can tell, clj-sandbox works by a set whitelist of
arbitrary functions, which is not a very generic approach. It works
for sandboxes like clojurebot, but not for other stuff.
A restricted eval in all likelihood will not refer directly to
clojure.core, and it's much better allowing the
I mentioned in the first message that javaop should also be disabled
in a restricted eval.
On May 6, 5:18 pm, gary ng garyng2...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Mibu mibu.cloj...@gmail.com wrote:
As far as I can tell, clj-sandbox works by a set whitelist of
arbitrary
Am I the only one driven mad by the new auto-appended signature to
every message in this group (You received this message because you
are subscribed...)? It started on April 16th. Is there a way a
moderator can stop it?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
Congratulations Rich and everyone for 1.0!
Clojure really is remarkable, and people start to notice.
Today, when people want to know something new they first go to
Wikipedia before they even visit the homepage. There will be a lot of
new interest in Clojure now that it has reached 1.0.
Please
Mark,
Thanks for the excellent article. Your Clojure page is a great
resource page too. Loved the Clojure Categorized. It's similar to what
Chouser started doing in the official docs. This categorizing and
tagging is tremendously helpful for understanding the vocabulary of
the language in the
If you have to ask if a technology is production ready then it isn't.
On Apr 15, 10:34 pm, Aaron Feng aaron.f...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I work for a large financial software company, and we are interested
in using Clojure for our new project. Due to the concurrent nature of
the project, we
Why does range in Clojure use an inclusive-exclusive range?
I'm aware of the traditional substring range convention, which always
puzzled me as to how an unintuitive and error-prone use became
cemented as the norm.
I'm not calling for a change in range. I'm just genuinely curious.
On Mar 4, 2:46 pm, Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Mibu mibu.cloj...@gmail.com wrote:
Why does range in Clojure use an inclusive-exclusive range?
For what it's worth, Python's range function works the same way.
I think Clojure's design leans towards
Joshua, my puzzlement is not with the first element but the last.
For example, the (range -1 2) gives (-1 0 1).
On Mar 4, 3:06 pm, Joshua Fox joshuat...@gmail.com wrote:
This is discussed, with references,
herehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Array#Index_of_the_first_element
doseq is the idiomatic way to write imperative code segments like this
(add-watch generates a side-effect). Nevertheless, I too love using
map for stuff like that. All you need to do is surround the map with
dorun (or doall if you need the return value) and it will force the
computation.
see:
comp.lang.lisp had a great Road to Clojure Survey thread which was
actually an x-is-better-than-y thread that turned into a full blown
flamewar.
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.lisp/browse_thread/thread/0d05837df1efe075
These kind of threads are usually pointless, but this specific
For me, Clojure made programming exhilarating again.
Thank you, Rich and everyone else for making this happen.
On Feb 20, 9:59 pm, Rich Hickey richhic...@gmail.com wrote:
There have been many new additions to the contributors list:
http://clojure.org/contributing
and many new donations:
I'm all for breaking bad habits and names and I love it that you give
good design considerations precedence over heritage, but here I think
using the first/rest/next combo is confusing, and will continue to be
confusing in the long-term.
rest is expected to be a sequence by Lispers, and next is
If you want to test your code, you can use the 50 sudokus from Project
Euler problem 96:
http://projecteuler.net/index.php?section=problemsid=96
You will have to register and log in to check your answer.
On Feb 6, 4:22 pm, Tzach tzach.livya...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
As my first Clojure
Check out the comment left by Blue Phil. Priceless.
On Jan 31, 6:40 am, Jon Harrop j...@ffconsultancy.com wrote:
Apologies if you've seen this before but I just thought it was absolutely
hillarious:
http://www.3ofcoins.net/2009/01/30/common-lisp-clojure-and-seriousness/
--
Dr Jon Harrop,
At this point I think maybe a broader more abstract view is in order.
How about watchers for every mutable construct in Clojure?
On Feb 1, 7:12 am, Mark Fredrickson mark.m.fredrick...@gmail.com
wrote:
I know its been discussed before, but I would like to register a
request for a feature:
What do you think about adding these new reader macros:
!form = (complement form)
#!(...) = (fn [args] (complement (...)))
Two problems I see with these macros are the hassle to the reader with
names that include '!' (e.g. set!, swap!), and the possible confusion
of meaning with (not form) to
, psort, and par:map functions, but
I wasn't very successful. Anyone who knows what s/he's doing can shed
some light on how to use it with this example?
Mibu
P.S. psort and sort's arguments are inconsistent (psort [coll comp]
vs. sort [comp coll]).
On Dec 30, 3:56 pm, Piotr 'Qertoip' Włodarek qert
it. You've got spit.
Mibu
On Dec 28, 4:22 pm, Boyd Brown boy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello. I can't seem to find 'spit'.
java exception: unable to resolve symbol spit.
I'm using Clojure Box rev1142. Tried using the clojure.jar from the
20081217 release
of Clojure but to no avail.
spit
Is there a way to sort a sorted-map-by by value without a letrec?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this
)) }) {}
(map #(.toLowerCase %)
(re-seq #\w+
(slurp input-filename)
Mibu
On Dec 25, 2:16 pm, Piotr 'Qertoip' Włodarek qert...@gmail.com
wrote:
Given the input text file, the program
in.
Mibu
[1] http://d2nbqsesuabw8o.cloudfront.net/tmp/doc-1116/index.html
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe
Is it possible to remove the asserts in derive that restrict the
parent and child to namespace-qualified names?
It would be much more useful if the asserts are moved to the global-
hierarchy case ([child parent]) and the private hierarchies ([h
child parent]) can do as they wish. Maybe ditch the
property. I just think free software licenses are useless at best
and counterproductive at worst when applied to projects that are
supposed to be free.
About the flame war thingy, it's with a tongue-in-cheek.
Mibu
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you
that invigorating entry to this group, I must say Clojure
looks so good, I can't remember when I felt so excited and hopeful
about a new piece of technology. Thanks for making this happen with or
without those stupid licenses.
Mibu
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
32 matches
Mail list logo
