Hi Rahul, Akar seems very nice! It works in Clojurescript?
Saludos,
Nahuel Greco.
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Rahul Goma Phulore <
rahul.phulore@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, all.
>
> I am quite excited to announce my project Akar –
> https://github.com/missingfaktor/ak
Maybe a better word for complecting is "entangling".
Saludos,
Nahuel Greco.
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 5:19 AM, Colin Yates <colin.ya...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > (Clojure's vocabulary is not to be questioned...why say "conflate" or
> "confuse" when
an immutable one :)
Saludos,
Nahuel Greco.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Mark Engelberg mark.engelb...@gmail.com
wrote:
I think all of James' points about the proven value of structuring an
application primarily around data rather than a complex API are right on
point. It is one
: If middleman is managing all the communication with the external
service for *multiple* producers, then it can't be reduced to a simple
synchronous function call from a producer, hence the necessity of
core.async (the alternative is to descend to locks world).
Saludos,
Nahuel Greco.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014
a deep dive on
core.async code :)
Saludos,
Nahuel Greco.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Fergal Byrne fergalbyrnedub...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Nahuel,
Thanks for the clarification. Multiple producers, single middleman is a
different problem from the one we (or at least I) thought we were dealing
wasn't included in core.async and the feasibility of adding it.
Thanks for your replies.
Saludos,
Nahuel Greco.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Fergal Byrne fergalbyrnedub...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Nahuel,
If you look at the definition of simple it means not compound. In your
case, you are trying
to other services, so I
think is a little off base the original question.
Saludos,
Nahuel Greco.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Leon Grapenthin grapenthinl...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thursday, October 9, 2014 2:22:50 PM UTC+2, Nahuel Greco wrote:
Fluid: as you said, backpressure on the outgoing
this, because you need to
contact the external service to decide to consume the value or not.
Saludos,
Nahuel Greco.
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Fluid Dynamics a2093...@trbvm.com wrote:
On Sunday, October 5, 2014 12:51:04 AM UTC-4, Nahuel Greco wrote:
I was thinking in a single-consumer scenario
Adrian: I don't see how a pub can help here, in the previous example to
consume or not the value was decided not on some property intrinsic to the
value (one you can create a topic from), but on the result of sending it to
an external service.
Saludos,
Nahuel Greco.
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 12:59
my objective.
I think your pub proposal replaces the take-if proposal given before, but I
think take-if (and pub) doesn't work for this scenario.
Saludos,
Nahuel Greco.
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 1:20 PM, adrian.med...@mail.yu.edu wrote:
Then how would peeking at the value help?
On Sunday
maybe could be better and can simplify the
producer code.
Saludos,
Nahuel Greco.
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 1:57 PM, adrian.med...@mail.yu.edu wrote:
Ah, I think we're on the same page now. I've come across the need for this
recently in some code for a UDP based protocol between a multiplayer game
escribió:
On Sunday, October 5, 2014 5:33:16 PM UTC+2, Nahuel Greco wrote:
Picture the following:
producer --- go-loop --- external service
1- The producer puts a value to a unbuffered (chan) by doing (! c v)
2- The go-loop consumes the value with a take operation, **unblocking**
the producer
...@gmail.com escribió:
I think you should go for the ack solution. What is your reservation about
it?
On Sunday, 5 October 2014, Leon Grapenthin grapenthinl...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sunday, October 5, 2014 5:33:16 PM UTC+2, Nahuel Greco wrote:
Picture the following:
producer --- go-loop
I was thinking in a single-consumer scenario with a buffered chan, in which
you want to check if you can consume the value before effectively consuming
it. As you said, a peek operation has no sense if the channel has multiple
consumers.
Saludos,
Nahuel Greco.
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 9:17 PM
or a design rationale exists for not including that operation?
Saludos,
Nahuel Greco.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please
I reported this issue to the Clojure JIRA a while ago:
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-1418 , please vote it up.
El 29/09/2014 05:55, Sunil S Nandihalli sunil.nandiha...@gmail.com
escribió:
I think the definition of as- should be changed to this. I feel this
behavior is more consistent
/Int})
But this will not work because Prismatic Schema does some tricks with
dynamic binding when calling walker, so you can't simply delegate this way.
Maybe you need to discuss this in the ticket.
Saludos,
Nahuel Greco.
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Laurens Van Houtven _...@lvh.cc wrote
PD: Let's continue this thread on the github ticket.
Saludos,
Nahuel Greco.
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Nahuel Greco ngr...@gmail.com wrote:
Instead of defining Step superschema can you simply do:
(s/validate something (get-schema step))
??
If you need more than that, for example
what about:
(defmulti step-handler :type)
(defmulti get-schema :type) ;; returns the schema
And make your users implement both? Remember schemas are first-class
values.
Saludos,
Nahuel Greco.
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Laurens Van Houtven _...@lvh.io wrote:
Hi Nahuel,
Thanks
why not multimethods?
Saludos,
Nahuel Greco.
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Laurens Van Houtven _...@lvh.cc wrote:
Hi Clojurers,
I'm writing a capability system with Clojure. Make a request to a URL, it
grabs the plan for what it should do from the database. A plan consists
(eventually
resolve will
raise an exception if not found, but it returns nil. Moral: sleep
deprivation is bad for debugging :)
Saludos,
Nahuel Greco.
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 5:05 AM, Nahuel Greco ngr...@gmail.com wrote:
This works ok at the REPL:
(def ^{:k :v} a 4)
(:k (meta (resolve 'a)))
;= evaluates
))) :v))) ;; fails, metadata is nil
I know deftest wraps his body in a fn, but this works ok:
((fn []
(def ^{:k :v} c 4)
(:k (meta (resolve 'c)))
))
Why the deftest case is not working?
Saludos,
Nahuel Greco.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
(assoc m :doc docstring)
m)
...
I added a JIRA issue to report track this (I think) enhacement:
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-1418
Saludos,
Nahuel Greco.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Very nice! Selectable channels FTW.
Btw, are you aware of the Erlang selective-receive model? Is often very
overlooked but it showed big advantages over unfiltered channels. See this:
http://www.erlang.se/euc/05/1500Wiger.ppt
Saludos,
Nahuel Greco.
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Rich Hickey
I forgot the second Ulf Wiger link, related to the previous one:
http://www.infoq.com/presentations/Death-by-Accidental-Complexity
Saludos,
Nahuel Greco.
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Nahuel Greco ngr...@gmail.com wrote:
Very nice! Selectable channels FTW.
Btw, are you aware
Check the clojure-py2 project, they plan to use LLVM to generate native
modules (as C compiled) for Python. When that objective is reached probably
you will have almost all the machinery to compile python-less native
binaries:
http://lanyrd.com/2013/clojurewest/sccgmm/
Saludos,
Nahuel Greco
Clojure
versions?
Saludos,
Nahuel Greco.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe
Another nice and simple addition to clojure.inspector would be add
auto-refreshing, so you can pass a reference and it and will display always
his latest version (maybe by using a watcher). It will be nice for live
debugging.
Saludos,
Nahuel Greco.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Denis Labaye
like windows out of browser selections, so many Vars can
be watched live in the least screen state possible.
Saludos,
Nahuel Greco.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Frank Siebenlist
frank.siebenl...@gmail.com wrote:
Check out clj-ns-browser (https://github.com/franks42/clj-ns-browser
like windows out of browser selections, so many Vars can
be watched live without using too much screen space.
Saludos,
Nahuel Greco.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Frank Siebenlist
frank.siebenl...@gmail.com wrote:
Check out clj-ns-browser (https://github.com/franks42/clj-ns-browser
the program becomes queriable via datalog. This could
possibly be used for static analysis of Clojure code.
Saludos,
Nahuel Greco.
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Steve Tickle ticklest...@gmail.com wrote:
It would be more interesting to see a version control system based on
storing an abstract
What about storing the vars definitions in Datomic? Maybe augmented
with semantic information (added defmethod, redefined function,
etc).
Saludos,
Nahuel Greco.
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 5:19 AM, Mark Derricutt m...@talios.com wrote:
On 17/07/12 10:27 PM, N8Dawgrr wrote:
In a nutshell its
in the expression but as an special punctuation syntax.
My question is, which other special macroexpansions exists? There
is a complete list somewhere? Where these macros are located in the
Clojure compiler source?
Saludos,
Nahuel Greco.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
33 matches
Mail list logo
