, and if so, what they are.
Eg:
lein outdated
[org.clojure/clojurescript 0.0-1586] is available but we use 0.0-971
--
Dave
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Tom Hall thattommyh...@gmail.com wrote:
Sure, just add it as an explicit dependency to your project. In fact,
your example uses
to
src/cljs/aima_clojure
and the file
tictactoe-frontend.cljs
to
tictactoe_frontend.cljs
Maybe we should warn on encountering filenames with dashes, or else
treat them as equivalent to underscores?
Cheers,
Michał
On 4 March 2013 21:35, Tom Hall thattommyh...@gmail.com wrote
Sure, just add it as an explicit dependency to your project. In fact,
your example uses r1450 only because you've got an explicit dependency
on it, as lein-cljsbuild 0.3.0 uses r1552 by default, so you could
also drop the explicit dependency. It's best to use the latest release
though.
Hello,
I have just been stuck for ages trying to figure out what was going on
in my first clojurescript application and think I have found a bug.
I took some working game playing code for a simple tictactoe example
and found that I got incorrectly names JS outputted
I have created a project
OK, I guess the essence is:
Why does Clojure not need retry or orElse when another implementer of
STM considers them essential?
I'm guessing it's because clojures in MVCC but would like confirmation
and perhaps links to comparisons between STMs and maybe a guide to
Clojures.
How would you solve
Why does Clojure not need retry or orElse when another implementer of
STM considers them essential?
What are retry and orElse? What do they do?
I had hoped to get a reply from someone with experience of both, as
the quote suggests they are for blocking and choice (The article was
the first
A few months ago I reread Simon Peyton Joneses article on STM in the
Beautiful Code book and decided to try and translate it into clojures
STM
See the paper here http://research.microsoft.com/pubs/74063/beautiful.pdf
He says 'Atomic blocks as we have introduced them so far are utterly
inadequate
Hi Guys,
We seem to have not-any? but not an any? function,
I know we have some but it is not a predicate and I found myself
defining some? above today.
Why not have some? or any? in the core?
Cheers,
Tom
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure
I thought tail recursion was actually not possible on the JVM but saw
a talk on the Erlang VM yesterday and Robert Virding mentioned that
Erjang managed to do it.
I'm sure the core guys have seen it but just in case others thought
the same as me here are a few links:
Hi Marek,
I too am a mostly Python guy looking at clojure. I think you will like
the for macro as it is a lot like list comprehensions.
I did Euler45 in clojure too and
https://github.com/thattommyhall/Project-Euler/blob/master/45.clj runs
in 700ms
I thought it was quite a nice soln: triangles,
I know I should not be naming my functions the same thing as ones in
core but was surprised when I wrote the following
https://github.com/thattommyhall/tth-SICP/blob/master/1-35.clj
I have being doing the SICP stuff in clojure and accieently copied
try as the fn name and it did not work, I noticed
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 1:51 AM, Stuart Halloway
stuart.hallo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tom,
try is a special form, and test is a function.
Stu
Cheers Stu, should have thought of that.
Am I correct in thinking only 3 possibilitys for try in
(try 1)
special form, macro, function
?
Are the
You should be able to use (apply max-key f someseq); apply takes a variable
number of args, and only the last is expanded.
Thanks, thought there would be something like this!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group,
Hi,
I think a better usage for max-key would be
(max-key f someseq)
rather than passing the values as args.
I used
(defn max-key-seq [f someseq]
(apply max-key (into [f] someseq)))
to make it do what I wanted
Is there a better way?
Cheers,
Tom
--
You received this message because you are
14 matches
Mail list logo
