Feb 17th - I was talking about the exploratory code I had written and you
said :
"Is there a specific part of this implementation which means it needs to
live in core?
It would be cool to have this as a library that could be used with existing
versions of clojure"
:-)
No, this has nothing to
I did?
I have no recollection of this at all!
Is this a similar concept to the Patricia trees as found in
https://github.com/clojure/data.int-map ?
Glen
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@g
all is explained in the README on github :-)
and here is an example Splicer:
https://github.com/JulesGosnell/seqspert/blob/master/src/java/clojure/lang/ArrayNodeAndArrayNodeSplicer.java
Jules
On Monday, 17 November 2014 23:01:44 UTC, Fluid Dynamics wrote:
>
> On Monday, November 17, 2014 5:00
On Monday, November 17, 2014 5:00:23 PM UTC-5, Jules wrote:
>
> Back in February, I posted about some prototype code I had put together
> that attempted an alternative approach to map-merging that promised to be
> faster and generate less churn than the standard approach.
>
> Glen Mailer suggeste
Back in February, I posted about some prototype code I had put together
that attempted an alternative approach to map-merging that promised to be
faster and generate less churn than the standard approach.
Glen Mailer suggested that I put it in a standalone library. At the time, I
thought that t
