Thank you, I'm using it and it does work. However, there is presumably a
good reason for the existence of the ^objects annotation, so the question
remains whether this is a) specified behavior and b) the way it is planned
to stay.
On Saturday, February 23, 2013 10:32:31 PM UTC+1, Michael Klishi
2013/2/24 Marko Topolnik
> I do need to avoid reflection.
Then use ^"[Ljava.lang.Object;"
and friends, it works just fine.
--
MK
http://github.com/michaelklishin
http://twitter.com/michaelklishin
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" grou
Actually, ^doubles can be used for two separate things, one of which
applies to ^objects as well: avoid reflection and avoid boxing/unboxing. I
do need to avoid reflection.
On Saturday, February 23, 2013 10:00:58 PM UTC+1, Michael Klishin wrote:
>
>
> 2013/2/24 Marko Topolnik >
>
>> Is this beh
2013/2/24 Marko Topolnik
> Is this behavior specified? It certainly doesn't make sense from a
> language user perspective.
^doubles can be used to avoid boxing on the hot code path, what would you
gain with ^objects?
--
MK
http://github.com/michaelklishin
http://twitter.com/michaelklishin
--
user> (def ^doubles s)
#'user/s
user> (defn s ^objects [])
#'user/s
user> (def ^objects s)
CompilerException java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to resolve symbol:
objects in this context, compiling:(NO_SOURCE_PATH:1)
Is this behavior specified? It certainly doesn't make sense from a language
u
