Re: Clojure and IBM JVM

2014-12-18 Thread Francis Avila
For completeness and internet posterity, this issue produced the following ticket and resolution: http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-1620 On Thursday, December 18, 2014 9:16:06 AM UTC-6, Alex Miller wrote: > > The problem is in the static initializer (which is gigantic), not the > particular

Re: Clojure and IBM JVM

2014-12-18 Thread Alex Miller
The problem is in the static initializer (which is gigantic), not the particular 2-liner, which is being called when the class loads. Here's the disassembled bytecode: https://gist.github.com/puredanger/40dd3ec22fdb5836d1eb On a first pass through it's not obvious to me what's causing the bloat

Clojure and IBM JVM

2014-12-18 Thread Laurent PETIT
Hello, A Counterclockwise user reports that it cannot use the IBM Rational tool with Counterclockwise. The error is that a function, in a counterclockwise namespace, cannot be compiled, because one of its method size is too large. The function is a 2 liner, accessing a java static method via int