+1
Accepting CAs by mail would be very welcome.
The impact of this until now is something quite difficult to measure, since
potential contributors maybe never voiced their interest and just quit when
they get to know the effort (or cost) required. But it probably makes a
difference when a
On Wednesday, September 19, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Michael Klishin wrote:
Paul deGrandis:
4.) What are the limitations behind changing the CA process? Can the CA
process be made digital (a scan of a signed CA, SSH shared key, OAuth
credential confirmation) or potentially reformed to allow more
Stuart:
Regarding making clojure.test/clojure.string/etc. contrib libraries, does
it make sense to also move clojure.core to a contrib style library. The
idea here would be that Clojure 1.6 is the bundling of all smaller
Clojure lib/contrib subsets, whose version number is always in sync
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Andy Fingerhut
andy.finger...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Paul deGrandis paul.degran...@gmail.com
wrote:
1.) Clojure.org should have a better host of documentation, especially for
newcomers.
The only things required for someone to create
3.) Much like an Emergency Room, there should be a a fast-track to getting
smaller patches approved and merged.
This is actually not a problem consistent across all areas of the language -
some contrib libraries and ClojureScript in particular seem to be getting
this *just right*.
Is
Andy Fingerhut:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Paul deGrandis
paul.de...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
1.) Clojure.org should have a better host of documentation, especially
for newcomers.
We saw from the Clojure Survey, as well as threads here on the mailing
list, that
Currently I advice Clojure newcomers to not use clojure.org for anything, it
is hopelessly outdated, reference-oriented and will only confuse them more.
Unsurprisingly, this does not encourage newcomers as they think that many
other things are hopelessly broken and outdated in this
On Sep 19, 2012, at 12:11 AM, kovas boguta wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Andy Fingerhut
andy.finger...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Paul deGrandis paul.degran...@gmail.com
wrote:
1.) Clojure.org should have a better host of documentation, especially for
Andy - you're the perfect model of someone stepping up from the community
and making the situation better for everyone. I'm sure I speak for a large
population when I say, Thank You.
For sure, I'd love to see an updated ClojureDocs-like system, hooked up to
the build process and integrated
2012/9/19 Paul deGrandis paul.degran...@gmail.com
For sure, I'd love to see an updated ClojureDocs-like system, hooked up to
the build process and integrated into clojure.org. (Including all of
contrib and CLJS)
This sounds like a good idea.
Pairing that with ClojureWerkz-style pages for
Paul deGrandis:
4.) What are the limitations behind changing the CA process? Can the CA
process be made digital (a scan of a signed CA, SSH shared key, OAuth
credential confirmation) or potentially reformed to allow more of the
community to easily get involved, especially for smaller
Stuart, can you elaborate a little what better triage looks like? What are
the current issues you're facing and what would make the process better for
you? The ER metaphor perhaps isn't the best :)
What are other ways the community can help get changes pushed along better
and integrated?
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Andy Fingerhut
andy.finger...@gmail.com wrote:
Kovas, have you used ClojureDocs.org? If not, I recommend trying it out. In
under 5 minutes, you should be able to figure out how to add an example.
ClojureDocs is pretty nice.
Incidentally, I'm not personally
On Wednesday, September 19, 2012 11:43:45 AM UTC-4, Michael Klishin wrote:
2012/9/19 Paul deGrandis paul.de...@gmail.com javascript:
My concern with growing the documentation on the dev.clojure is that it
takes a CA to contribute. I think we'd be better served as a community to
open up
Clojure Conj is nearly upon us. Last year there was a very positive
meeting to discuss and help improve the contribution process.
This year I thought it might be helpful to get some ideas on the table and
refined by the community before the Conj.
This has also been a common topic in #clojure.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Paul deGrandis paul.degran...@gmail.comwrote:
1.) Clojure.org should have a better host of documentation, especially for
newcomers.
We saw from the Clojure Survey, as well as threads here on the mailing
list, that documentation is still something on which we
16 matches
Mail list logo
