On Dec 12, 2:15 am, Mark Engelberg mark.engelb...@gmail.com wrote:
If you wanted to extend deref to new types, is there any way to do
that? For example, deref of a delay could be equivalent to a force.
Or deref of a Future could invoke the Future's get method. This would
give you the
If you wanted to extend deref to new types, is there any way to do
that? For example, deref of a delay could be equivalent to a force.
Or deref of a Future could invoke the Future's get method. This would
give you the handy @ reader macro for things that frequently need to
be forced to evaluate
