Am 03.01.2011 21:45, schrieb pavelludiq:
On Jan 3, 11:24 am, Jozef Wagner wrote:
Some of my arguments are:
- Clojure has no custom reader macros, makes it easier to read others code
- Protocols and the way clojure handles data helps to explicitly formulate
specifications and designs
- Fresh sy
On Jan 3, 2:24 pm, Jozef Wagner wrote:
> Our team works on big EU projects, where there are many technical partners
> from different countries cooperating. Most of our work is about choosing a
> good technology and then about customizing and integrating it into our
> system. Usually SOA, Enterpr
Clojure is extremely consise.
IMO it's very beneficial for maintaining a complex codebase and
underestimated in the corporate world.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note th
2011/1/3 Jozef Wagner
> Our team works on big EU projects, where there are many technical partners
> from different countries cooperating. Most of our work is about choosing a
> good technology and then about customizing and integrating it into our
> system. Usually SOA, Enterprise Java and seman
On Jan 3, 11:24 am, Jozef Wagner wrote:
> Some of my arguments are:
> - Clojure has no custom reader macros, makes it easier to read others code
> - Protocols and the way clojure handles data helps to explicitly formulate
> specifications and designs
> - Fresh syntax which improves readability
>
Our team works on big EU projects, where there are many technical partners
from different countries cooperating. Most of our work is about choosing a
good technology and then about customizing and integrating it into our
system. Usually SOA, Enterprise Java and semantic web technologies are in
