On Jul 29, 1:18 am, Ken Wesson kwess...@gmail.com wrote:
On the one hand, assuming that Java 7 doesn't outright break anything, [...]
Like loops?
http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2011/07/28/dont-use-java-7-for-anything/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
On 07/28/2011 11:54 AM, Daniel Gagnon wrote:
So, what does it means for Clojure?
Faster execution? Some new interesting stuff in the standard Java library?
And I remember there was something about forkjoin that would be good
for Clojure, what about that?
--
You received this message because
So, what does it means for Clojure?
Faster execution? Some new interesting stuff in the standard Java library?
And I remember there was something about forkjoin that would be good for
Clojure, what about that?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Daniel Gagnon redalas...@gmail.com wrote:
So, what does it means for Clojure?
It's not going to mean anything for a long time. Clojure still
supports Java 5 so it is probably going to be years before Java 7 is
mainstream enough that Clojure can _require_ it.
--
Can clojure take advantage of some features if they are available? I know
the JRuby dudes are pretty excited about invoke dynamic...
Kenny
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Sean Corfield seancorfi...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Daniel Gagnon redalas...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have to agree with this. In fact, it would be much easier to
integrate into Clojure than JRuby (or other JVM languages).
I know the Clojure Java source code pretty well, and wouldn't mind
playing with it a bit to see how feasible it is.
The ideal deployment solution would be to have an extra
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Kenny Stone kennethst...@gmail.com wrote:
Can clojure take advantage of some features if they are available? I know
the JRuby dudes are pretty excited about invoke dynamic...
I'm not really sure there's a single answer to that question.
On the one hand,
AFAIK using InvokeDynamic *requires* Java7, so I think it will be done
if Java7 gets default and it fits for Clojure.
However, for example, new HotSpot gains more performance then Clojure
may also gain if you use Java7...
(but you can't force everyone to use Java7 of course.)
Also, you can call
The new JVM really starts fast. Clojure users will like that. I also
noticed that (at least for 64-bit) that the Windows version only comes
with the hotspot compiler. No client jvm. I haven't checked 32-bit.
This is a big change, because previous 32-bit JRE's only came w/
client. I had never
From http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/hotspotfaq-138619.html :
---
I would like java to default to -server. I have a lot of scripts which
I cannot change (or do not want to change). Is there any way to do
this?
Since Java SE 5.0, with the exception of 32-bit Windows, the server VM
will
10 matches
Mail list logo