out
> interactive data visualization and literate programming with Hanami&Saite:
>
> https://twitter.com/scicloj/status/1164887113680281600
>
> On Sat, 10 Aug 2019 at 21:39, Daniel Slutsky
> wrote:
>
>> Here is the video of yesterday's meeting, with Christopher
Preparing to the meeting next week, with Jon Anthony 's talk about
interactive data visualization and literate programming with Hanami&Saite:
https://twitter.com/scicloj/status/1164887113680281600
On Sat, 10 Aug 2019 at 21:39, Daniel Slutsky
wrote:
> Here is the video of yesterd
er.com/scicloj/status/1157646172770721798
>
> On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 at 23:28, Daniel Slutsky
> wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>>
>> In August, the Scicloj <https://twitter.com/scicloj> community will
>> begin a series of web meetings about data visualization and literate
&
web meetings about data visualization and literate programming
> in Clojure.
>
>
> On the first meeting, Friday, Aug 9th, 5pm-7pm UTC, @Christopher_Smallwill
> talk
> about Oz <https://github.com/metasoarous/oz>.
>
>
> If you are interested in this series
Hi.
In August, the Scicloj <https://twitter.com/scicloj> community will begin a
series of web meetings about data visualization and literate programming in
Clojure.
On the first meeting, Friday, Aug 9th, 5pm-7pm UTC, @Christopher_Smallwill talk
about Oz <https://github.com/metas
After @bbatsov's explaination. I think he is right. I'm considering to
improve my solution. Might will be available soon.
[stardiviner] GPG key ID: 47C32433
IRC(freeenode): stardiviner Twitter: @numbchild
Key fingerprint = 9BAA 92BC CDDD B9EF 3B36 CB99 B8C4 B8
If you got any problem after use and test, GitHub issues and PR welcome.
Thanks.
[stardiviner] GPG key ID: 47C32433
IRC(freeenode): stardiviner Twitter: @numbchild
Key fingerprint = 9BAA 92BC CDDD B9EF 3B36 CB99 B8C4 B8E5 47C3 2433
Blog: http://stardiviner.git
No, I asked Clojure ML, and posted an issue on clojure-mode GitHub issues.
I need to find a workaround on myself.
You can check out the discussion here
https://github.com/clojure-emacs/clojure-mode/pull/465.
[stardiviner] GPG key ID: 47C32433
IRC(freeenode): stardiviner
I created a package ob-clojure-literate for Clojure Literate Programming in
Org-mode. Welcome to use it and add PR.
https://github.com/stardiviner/ob-clojure-literate
I still have two features not implemented. Hope someone will PR. Thanks
very much.
[stardiviner] GPG key ID
On Thursday, May 22, 2014 6:20:39 PM UTC-4, Mars0i wrote:
>
> On Thursday, May 22, 2014 4:05:58 PM UTC-5, Gary Johnson wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I suspect I'm the Gary that Tim thought he was referring to since I've
>> posted on several of his other LP-related threads (though not this one
>>
On Thursday, May 22, 2014 4:05:58 PM UTC-5, Gary Johnson wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I suspect I'm the Gary that Tim thought he was referring to since I've
> posted on several of his other LP-related threads (though not this one
> until now).
>
I cede the name "Gary" to Gary.
> But really,
>I know Clojure doesn't have all the documentation many would like, but Tim,
>this bit of info is in readme.txt, and the first 3 lines of every source
>file from the library :-)
Touche! +2 points to you!
I love it when my oh-so-noisy self gets skewered by facts! :-)
Tim Daly
--
You received th
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Tim Daly wrote:
> >Tim, as someone already mentioned, the multi-page Java code you posted
> from
> >"the Clojure core" is actually one file from the Java ASM library, copied
> >into the Clojure Github repository from one version of that library
> >available from
t ourselves what tools or references we are finding useful in
our journey. Clearly some folks (Gregg included) are churning out some
pretty neat looking tools to make LP easier to do in the Clojure world. I
for one would love to see more lively discussion around that and not feel
like we're
Tim,
Your project of LP'ing the Clojure internals is not at all inconsistent
with my view. That is code that would benefit from being widely
understood, even by people who won't maintain it. I learned a lot from
reading the "Lions" book on an early version of Unix, even though I
probably ne
>PS I have many chunks of code that I wrote 20-30 years ago and I have no
>idea why and what the code was written for even after reading each
>line of the code
This is what got me interested in literate programming.
Axiom was written at IBM as "research code", most
>Tim, as someone already mentioned, the multi-page Java code you posted from
>"the Clojure core" is actually one file from the Java ASM library, copied
>into the Clojure Github repository from one version of that library
>available from here:
Hmmm, I didn't see that in the documentation :-)
Thanks
Forward from Ralf Hemmecke:
On 05/22/2014 11:21 AM, Gregg Reynolds wrote:
> I can tell you I would rather maintain the four lines of C++ without
> the largely useless commentary.
That's a simple AXIOM program, but I'm sure one can easily translate it
into any programming language.
foo(a: Intege
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 11:16 PM, u1204 wrote:
> Heck, it is only 4 lines of C++. Why bother? *I* can read C++. I can
> even reverse engineer it (probably by inventing the diagram in Figure
> 2.7 on a napkin). Maybe it lives in the src/SamRecon/StratSam, which is
> all the organization necessary
Howdy Tim,
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 1:16 AM, u1204 wrote:
> Gregg and Gary,
>
> I understand where you are coming from. Indeed, Maturana [0] is on your
> side of the debate. Since even the philosophers can't agree, I doubt we
> will find a common ground.
>
Ah, but philosophers never agree. Dis
Gregg and Gary,
I understand where you are coming from. Indeed, Maturana [0] is on your
side of the debate. Since even the philosophers can't agree, I doubt we
will find a common ground.
Unfortunately, I've decided to take on the task of documenting the
Clojure internals because, yaknow, *I* don
off between the desire to see a lot of code at once,
> without a lot of text cluttering it up, and understanding what the code is
> doing. Comments hurt the former but can help the latter. The same thing
> goes for literate programming, but--it depends on your goals and your human
> au
ng. Comments hurt the former but can help the latter. The same thing
goes for literate programming, but--it depends on your goals and your human
audience.
4. Two examples to convey the context-dependence of appropriate
configuration schemes:
A. One time I wrote a small but slightly complex bi
t; is that we have learned,
> rather painfully, to be aware of the machinery of the process at every
> step of the way. This focus on the machinery becomes the expected way
> of communicating with the machine. Scratch any programmer, interview at
> any company, listen to any ta
ay. This focus on the machinery becomes the expected way
> of communicating with the machine. Scratch any programmer, interview at
> any company, listen to any talk, and you find "machinery".
>
How could it be otherwise? Programming is machine construction.
>
> But co
er, interview at
any company, listen to any talk, and you find "machinery".
But communication from the author to the audience is the underlying
theme of literate programming. Knuth's point is about communication,
not about the machinery of communication. The question is, to what
aud
Emacs org-mode provides a markdown-like language, which can be organized
into a foldable outline (e.g., chapters, sections, subsections,
subsubsections). Syntax is provided for headers, ordered/unordered lists,
tables, inline images/figures, hyperlinks, footnotes, and (most importantly
for LP)
comments, but no other explanatory text anywhere.
>
> (b) Literate programming.
Actually, lisp has a long tradition of semicolon-style comments where
Chapter
;;; Section
;; Subsection
;Paragraph or inline
With some Emacs hacking it would be possible to fold/unfold these
comments. I
text anywhere.
(b) Literate programming.
Of course long chunks of text are needed to explain algorithms, motivation,
paths not taken, etc. Literate programming requires that those chunks be
inserted into the source file, and that you have to run the source file
through a filter to get rid of
With respect to "documentation" of open source software...
"You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it
means." -- "The Princess Bride"
The notion that "reading the code" is the ultimate truth for
"documentation" is based on a misunderstanding at so many levels it is
hard t
modelled outputs. A literate programming style not only helps me to
organize my thoughts better (both hierarchically and sequentially), but it
provides me with a living (tangled) document that I can share with my
non-programmer colleagues to get their domain-specific feedback about my
choic
I've always seen this to document what the system does, as a way to gather
requirements. And the name used is similar to what you propose. Live
Specification or Specification by Example among other names.
It never occurred to me that this could be used for API documentation, and
I'm a completely n
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Erlis Vidal wrote:
> In the past I've used a java tool to write "acceptance tests". Concordion [
> http://concordion.org/]. The idea is simple yet effective. You write your
> documentation in HTML, and later you can run your code that will interact
> with that docu
In the past I've used a java tool to write "acceptance tests". Concordion [
http://concordion.org/]. The idea is simple yet effective. You write your
documentation in HTML, and later you can run your code that will interact
with that documentation and generate a new documentation, marking the
porti
Guys, you really are into the Literate part, those emails are huge! let me
catch up and then I'll reply...
Interesting discussion!
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Mark Engelberg wrote:
> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Mark Engelberg
> wrote:
>
>> In fact, Clojure has a number of features tha
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Mark Engelberg wrote:
> In fact, Clojure has a number of features that actively hurt its
> expressiveness relative to other modern languages:
>
BTW, that list was by no means exhaustive. In the past couple of hours
I've thought of a couple more, I'm sure others c
> For example, did you know that
> the book/literate program "Physically Based Rendering" recently won a
> Scientific and Technical Academy Award? (Yes, that's right, a literate
> program won an Academy Award -- the "Hollywood movie" kind.)
An awesome book, b
tant part.
The problem is that we missed the "why". Sure, we have immutable, log32,
red-black trees (ILRB trees). Yes, we documented what the arguments mean.
But you'll notice that nowhere in the github tree is there any answer to
"why?".
A "literate programming style&qu
Greg,
I can tell by the amount of work you've put into this document that this is
an earnest attempt at analysis and not trolling, so I'm going to give you
my earnest response: you are wrong on so many levels.
First, you seem to have several misconceptions about literate programming
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!topic/clojure/oh_bWL9_jI0) is
> getting a little long so I'm starting a related one specific to litprog.
>
> I've made a start on rethinking LP at
> https://github.com/mobileink/codegenres/wiki/Rethinking-Literate-Programming
> .
>
mes coming
up with the right terminology makes all the difference (see "lambda
abstraction").
* Speaking of which, Knuth himself admitted that his choice of "literate
programming" as the name of his "new method" was tongue in cheek, since it
makes anybody who doesn't u
Yep. Thanks for the patch, Ben. I had set
org-babel-default-header-args:clojure to '((:noweb . "tangle")) in my
.emacs, so I was getting the benefit of automatic noweb expansion when
tangling (but not weaving). It's all fun and games until you break someone
else's setup! ;)
~Gary
On Wednes
On 9/12/12 9:29 PM, Ben Mabey wrote:
Thanks for the great example Gary! I've been meaning to try org-babel
out for a while but never got around to it.
I just tried your example and when I run org-babel-tangle the code
blocks are not expanded into the source file, but rather the code
block nam
appears to be tangling.
I'm using Emacs 24 and the only org specific code I have is applying
your provided patch after requiring ob-clojure.
Thanks again for the example,
Ben
On 9/11/12 2:13 PM, Gary Johnson wrote:
I just put together a simple example repo on GitHub, containing a
lite
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Gary Johnson wrote:
> I just put together a simple example repo on GitHub, containing a literate
> programming solution to the Potter Kata (
> http://codingdojo.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?KataPotter) using Emacs' org-babel
> mode. You can
Il giorno 07/set/2012, alle ore 15:45, lambdatronic ha scritto:
> Thanks, Tim. This looks great.
>
> For those of you who don't want to go digging through the thread, here's the
> summary:
>
> Step 1. Download nrepl-0.1.4-preview from Marmalade or MELPA (depends on
> clojure-mode 1.11).
>
>
I just put together a simple example repo on GitHub, containing a literate
programming solution to the Potter Kata
(http://codingdojo.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?KataPotter) using Emacs' org-babel
mode. You can check it out here:
https://github.com/lambdatronic/org-babel-example
Also be su
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 6:42 PM, lambdatronic wrote:
> For those people (like myself) who do a lot of Literate Programming in
> Emacs using Clojure and org-babel, migrating to nrepl and nrepl.el is
> somewhat non-trivial. This is because the existing Clojure support in
> org-babel (o
Thanks, Tim. This looks great.
For those of you who don't want to go digging through the thread, here's
the summary:
Step 1. Download nrepl-0.1.4-preview from Marmalade or MELPA (depends on
clojure-mode 1.11).
Step 2. Add this code to your .emacs file:
;; Patch ob-clojure to work with nrepl
(
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 9:42 AM, lambdatronic wrote:
> For those people (like myself) who do a lot of Literate Programming in
> Emacs using Clojure and org-babel, migrating to nrepl and nrepl.el is
> somewhat non-trivial. This is because the existing Clojure support in
> org-babel (o
For those people (like myself) who do a lot of Literate Programming in
Emacs using Clojure and org-babel, migrating to nrepl and nrepl.el is
somewhat non-trivial. This is because the existing Clojure support in
org-babel (ob-clojure.el) relies on slime and swank-clojure when running
org-babel
me code to extract source from
a literate file. I had always been intrigued by literate programming and
your post especially inspired me to try it out.
I've now written a substantial amount of my project in Clojure in the
literate style. I'm using the "HTML" version of the l
es, but they are more based around
> the theory rather than actual use.
You might find this of interest:
Literate Programming example with Clojure
http://youtu.be/mDlzE9yy1mk
It is a quick video of my normal literate programming workflow
(ignoring the usual git commits)
It shows 3 thin
3:14:09 AM UTC-10, Colin Yates wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> There are some excellent resources on this mailing list regarding
>> literate resources, but they are more based around the theory rather than
>> actual use.
>>
>> Has anybody got any "real w
day, January 23, 2012 3:14:09 AM UTC-10, Colin Yates wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> There are some excellent resources on this mailing list regarding literate
> resources, but they are more based around the theory rather than actual use.
>
> Has anybody got any "real world usage re
request.
Note that the source and PDF are at:
src: http://daly.axiom-developer.org/clojure.pamphlet
pdf: http://daly.axiom-developer.org/clojure.pdf
I have a quick video of my normal literate programming workflow
(ignoring the usual git commits).
It shows 3 things:
1) Extracting Clojure
Fogus writes:
> I would love to see your .emacs setup around these tools.
I'll put together a blog post - my .emacs files could do with a cleanup,
so this sounds like a good excuse to get it done.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To
I would love to see your .emacs setup around these tools.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first
Mark Engelberg writes:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:38 AM, Hugo Duncan wrote:
>> SLIME works fully within the code blocks. For example C-x C-e can be
>> used to evaluate expressions. Paredit also works.
>
> My understanding is that unless you use C-c C-k to evaluate the entire
> file (which I don'
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:38 AM, Hugo Duncan wrote:
> SLIME works fully within the code blocks. For example C-x C-e can be
> used to evaluate expressions. Paredit also works.
My understanding is that unless you use C-c C-k to evaluate the entire
file (which I don't think works in a literate progra
Colin Yates writes:
> Has anybody got any "real world usage reports" regarding using literate
> programming in emacs? In particular, does paredit and slime work inside
> the clojure "fragments" when using org.babel for example?
For the update in Pallet docs [1],
a marvelous thing by forcing alter to
require dosync. It eliminates a whole class of errors.
When I find a mistake I still try to find the root cause.
Then I try to change what I do so the mistake cannot exist.
This changes the type of possible errors but the 3% is still
there. I just make "
On 30 Jan 2012, at 17:07, daly wrote:
>
> The key result was that I discovered what I call my personal
> "irreducible error rate". If I do 100 things I will make 3 errors.
> This was independent of the task. So typing 100 characters has
> 3 wrong letters which were mostly caught while typing. Wri
t least 21 uncaught errors lurking in those
equations. So before I attempt to generate the images I will
examine them in detail with an eye toward finding what I know
is there.
Literate programming is both a source of errors and a help.
It is a source of errors because I have more typing to do
an
I think I could live with that :)...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe
w I would find it incredibly helpful, and would consider paying a
> > token sum of money (£5?)...
>
> An amusing thought but no thanks.
> Buy yourself a pint and swear you'll at least try to write
> your next program in some form of literate programming.
> At the next conj I
On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 15:27 +, Colin Yates wrote:
> I know I would find it incredibly helpful, and would consider paying a
> token sum of money (£5?)...
An amusing thought but no thanks.
Buy yourself a pint and swear you'll at least try to write
your next program in some form
I know I would find it incredibly helpful, and would consider paying a
token sum of money (£5?)...
On 28 January 2012 15:04, daly wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 06:51 -0800, Folcon wrote:
> > Hi Tim,
> >
> >
> > Personally if you have done or would be interested in doing a quick
> > vid cast of
On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 06:51 -0800, Folcon wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
>
> Personally if you have done or would be interested in doing a quick
> vid cast of how you progress through your workflow, I think that would
> be very interesting.
Sort of "extreme pair programming with everybody"? :-)
There is no
Hi Tim,
Personally if you have done or would be interested in doing a quick vid
cast of how you progress through your workflow, I think that would be very
interesting.
Regards,
Folcon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this
Here's a paper that might be interesting to folk discussing in this
thread: http://www.jstatsoft.org/v46/i03/paper
Cheers
U
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts
Thanks Stuart.
On 24 January 2012 14:18, Stuart Sierra wrote:
> With a little hacking, org-babel works with Clojure editing & evaluation
> in SLIME. I've been using it to write Clojure training materials.
>
> You need the latest versions of org-mode, SLIME, and clojure-mode. My
> .emacs has the
With a little hacking, org-babel works with Clojure editing & evaluation in
SLIME. I've been using it to write Clojure training materials.
You need the latest versions of org-mode, SLIME, and clojure-mode. My
.emacs has the relevant elisp snippets.
http://github.com/stuartsierra/dotfiles
-S
-
The topic is literate programming in emacs, not eclipse ;).
The trivial amount of Clojure I have done so far has all been in emacs and
letting go of paredit, slime, and emacs in general is already pretty hard!
On 24 January 2012 03:06, daly wrote:
>
> > > For Eclipse I suppose we
d here.
>
> I don't use Eclipse. I was just following the principle that
> "advocacy is volunteering" and, since I'm advocating doing
> literate programming and the topic is literate Clojure
> under Eclipse, I felt I needed to set up some kind of
> solution. I try t
lugin.html
> > That would make Clojure and Literate much more useful
> > to Eclipse users.
>
> Based on CCW, or a de novo effort?
>
Ah. I was unaware of CCW although it has been mentioned here.
I don't use Eclipse. I was just following the principle that
"advocacy is volun
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 6:23 PM, daly wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 16:17 -0500, Cedric Greevey wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:19 AM, daly wrote:
>> > It accepts either noweb syntax for chunks, as in:
>> > <>=
>> > (this is lisp code)
>> > @
>>
>> A rather unfortunate choice of
On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 16:17 -0500, Cedric Greevey wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:19 AM, daly wrote:
> > It accepts either noweb syntax for chunks, as in:
> ><>=
> > (this is lisp code)
> >@
>
> A rather unfortunate choice of delimiter if you wanted to use this
> with Clojure cod
I've only briefly scanned what I think is the relevant code in tangle.lisp
posted by Tim Daly, but it appears that the @ must be the first character
on a line, which with indenting I've never seen in a Clojure source file.
It would be a tiny change to make the @ required to be on a line by itself,
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:19 AM, daly wrote:
> It accepts either noweb syntax for chunks, as in:
> <>=
> (this is lisp code)
> @
A rather unfortunate choice of delimiter if you wanted to use this
with Clojure code, since Clojure code frequently has internal @-signs
for other purposes.
Excellent - very nice!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this gro
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 5:14 AM, Colin Yates wrote:
> Has anybody got any "real world usage reports" regarding using literate
> programming in emacs? In particular, does paredit and slime work inside the
> clojure "fragments" when using org.babel for example?
I had
On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 07:18 -0800, Sam Ritchie wrote:
> I've been wondering this as well -- I'm specifically curious about how
> one might jump back and forth between literate source like this and
> the REPL. I know you can evaluate code snippets into the repl; I'm
> thinking of early steps like lo
d usage reports" regarding using
> literate programming in emacs? In particular, does paredit and slime
> work inside the clojure "fragments" when using org.babel for example?
I've been using literate programming for years in Axiom.
Basically I write in a buffer con
round the theory rather than actual use.
>
> Has anybody got any "real world usage reports" regarding using literate
> programming in emacs? In particular, does paredit and slime work inside
> the clojure "fragments" when using org.babel for example?
>
> Finall
Hi all,
There are some excellent resources on this mailing list regarding literate
resources, but they are more based around the theory rather than actual use.
Has anybody got any "real world usage reports" regarding using literate
programming in emacs? In particular, does paredit
Andrew writes:
> Eric asks: The only function ob-clojure uses from swank-clojure is
> swank:interactive-eval-region' (used with `slime-eval') in the
> org-babel-execute:clojure' function. Which function would now be used
> to evaluate a region of clojure code? Would `slime-eval-region'
> suffice?
I was able to get org-babel evaluation working with Clojure. Requires
latest versions of Clojure mode, Org mode, and Lein. Check out my dotfiles
repo for examples.
https://github.com/stuartsierra/dotfiles
-S
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure"
Eric asks: The only function ob-clojure uses from swank-clojure is
`swank:interactive-eval-region' (used with `slime-eval') in the
`org-babel-execute:clojure' function. Which function would now be used to
evaluate a region of clojure code? Would `slime-eval-region' suffice?
--
You received thi
Andrew writes:
> I found [1] from Eric Schulte which says to add certain package
> archives such that ELPA finds swank-clojure... But what about the
> swank-clojure elisp package being deprecated?
swank-clojure.el is definitely deprecated, but there could still be code
out there in the wild depe
I found [1] from Eric Schulte which says to add certain package archives
such that ELPA finds swank-clojure... But what about the swank-clojure
elisp package being deprecated? (By the way, I do get further now... the
clojure code evaluates)
(setq package-archives
'(("original". "ht
As you know, now I get
org-babel-execute:clojure:Cannot open load file: swank-clojure
The method org-babel-execute:clojure in my
.emacs.d/elpa/org-2029/ob-clojure.el file says (require 'swank-clojure).
Given that the swank-clojure elisp package is deprecated and should not be
used what sho
fine for a Clojure project.
J.
On Dec 22, 2011, at 10:14 PM, daly wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 17:53 -0800, nchurch wrote:
>> Firstly, there really needs to be something like a Github for literate
>> programming.
>
> What a great idea!
> I'll see what I can do.
&g
scuss the issue in the text as though you were talking
to someone other than yourself. Odds are good this is where a
design mistake (e.g. in the database schema) or a program bug lurks.
The meta-issue is distinguishing "communication" from "documentation".
Literate programming i
wledge or
> insight with which I had not formerly possessed in the moments prior?
> For in truth I have not been able to discern its helpfulness thereby.
Methinks thou hast conflated the spirit of literate programming,
intended as a communication medium between fellow traveling souls
on this
tence means. The .tex files ARE the
> literate program. By analogy, you seem to be asking something like
>
Please allow me to elucidate. In the literate programming tool I mentioned,
marginalia, the output is, in fact, raw HTML. A very kind gentlemen
involved with the project pointed me to th
>I'll do everything I can to help. I have tons of thoughts (as you
>might guess); but I haven't demonstrated myself to be a great coder,
>yet. I feel like I'm a coder who needs something like literate
>programming to be great, so it's kind of a chicken-and-egg pro
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 20:19 -0800, nchurch wrote:
> I'll do everything I can to help. I have tons of thoughts (as you
> might guess); but I haven't demonstrated myself to be a great coder,
> yet. I feel like I'm a coder who needs something like literate
> programming t
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 11:59 PM, nchurch wrote:
> What I really want you to notice is how we are faced with a choice:
> either we improve the library code (presumably by making split
> optionally return an array of separators matched by the regex for
> later reassembly by join, perhaps in metadat
to me this fits well
with Github's always-fork philosophy. I do think there is only one
way to write a good library function, but it may be that there will
need to be a proliferation of alternativeseach making its own
argument and tradeoffs across various levels of abstraction, to return
to the
1 - 100 of 209 matches
Mail list logo
