I think I may have found a minor issue with gen-class, but wanted to
confirm with the group that I'm not just doing something stupid...
(gen-class :name mypkg.foo
:prefix
:methods [[my-method [Object] Object]])
Results in the following method signature in the .class file:
Ah, that'll do it. Thanks.
On Jan 16, 1:02 pm, Kevin Downey redc...@gmail.com wrote:
- is not a Java letter or digit so it is not allowed in java method names.
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/third_edition/html/lexical.html#3.8
user= (Character/isJavaIdentifierPart (int \-))
false
On Jan 16, 2009, at 2:46 PM, Greg Harman wrote:
As I chew on this, a couple of things don't sit right with me
regarding use cases:
1. IMHO gen-class should fail with an appropriate message/exception
rather than trying to fix the signature. This is what the Java
compiler would do if I
2. If I want the Clojure functions that underlie the methods in the
generated class used directly by my Clojure code as well (which I do),
then I'm stuck having to either violate standard Clojure/Lisp function
naming conventions in favor of Java-friendly naming or I have to write
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Greg Harman ghar...@gmail.com wrote:
2. If I want the Clojure functions that underlie the methods in the
generated class used directly by my Clojure code as well (which I do),
then I'm stuck having to either violate standard Clojure/Lisp function
naming
