I spent hour already and can not understand what is wrong here.
I want to filter collection based on a nested field of collection
element having some value:
(println pinned-ids)
; #{200, 210}
(println (contains? pinned-ids 200))
; true
(println (map #(.. % :field :id) new-states))
; (10 20 21
Returns true if _key_ is present in the given collection, otherwise
returns false.
For sets like #{200, 210} the values also count as keys.
On Aug 2, 10:10 am, Petr Gladkikh petrg...@gmail.com wrote:
I spent hour already and can not understand what is wrong here.
I want to filter collection
Sorry, didn't read your post properly. Maybe it's because the ints are
of different types.
(contains? [(int 1)] (long 1))
false
On Aug 2, 10:13 am, Oskar Kvist oskar.kv...@gmail.com wrote:
Returns true if _key_ is present in the given collection, otherwise
returns false.
For sets like #{200,
Btw, that should be fixed in 1.3 I think.
On Aug 2, 10:18 am, Oskar Kvist oskar.kv...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, didn't read your post properly. Maybe it's because the ints are
of different types.
(contains? [(int 1)] (long 1))
false
On Aug 2, 10:13 am, Oskar Kvist oskar.kv...@gmail.com
I'm stupid today... I meant:
(contains? #{(int 1)} (long 1))
false
On Aug 2, 10:19 am, Oskar Kvist oskar.kv...@gmail.com wrote:
Btw, that should be fixed in 1.3 I think.
On Aug 2, 10:18 am, Oskar Kvist oskar.kv...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, didn't read your post properly. Maybe it's
Hi,
can't you just use the set itself as the function determining whether the
items contains the ID.
The following example uses just a vector of maps for the new-states and thus
uses - instead of .. but it seems to work
user= (def pinned-ids #{200, 210})
#'user/pinned-ids
user= (def
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Stefan Kamphausen
ska2...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
can't you just use the set itself as the function determining whether the
items contains the ID.
Set-as-function was the first thing I tried but it did not work either.
Based on my tweaking, type mismatch is
