Yes, that use case (two different non-predicate schemas) is no longer
supported. While superficially simple, it added a fair bit of
complexity and had corner cases that are not present with
`conditional` or `constrained`. Moreover, in our experience the
primary use case for `both` by far was
In this example, one of the schemas is a predicate schema. What if neither
of them are?
On Sunday, 6 March 2016 18:48:21 UTC-8, Jason Wolfe wrote:
>
> In place of (s/both long (s/pred odd?)) you can do (s/conditional odd?
> long), but (s/constrained long odd?) probably provides better error
>
In place of (s/both long (s/pred odd?)) you can do (s/conditional odd?
long), but (s/constrained long odd?) probably provides better error
messages (since it validates long before odd?). I think there are some
examples in the readme.
If this isn't what you're looking for, can you please
I've noticed that there is the function "both" in Schema.
Both says that it can be replaced by conditional, but I'm not sure exactly
how to go about doing this.
Can someone provide an example?
Thanks
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure"
