Re: Question on mandatory arguments for - and - macros

2012-10-12 Thread Laurent PETIT
2012/10/12 Jason Wolfe ja...@w01fe.com On Thursday, October 11, 2012 10:29:57 AM UTC-7, Shantanu Kumar wrote: On Tuesday, 9 October 2012 06:07:06 UTC+5:30, Jason Wolfe wrote: On Sunday, October 7, 2012 9:27:15 PM UTC-7, Shantanu Kumar wrote: On Monday, 8 October 2012 04:57:06

Re: Question on mandatory arguments for - and - macros

2012-10-12 Thread Shantanu Kumar
On Monday, 8 October 2012 09:57:15 UTC+5:30, Shantanu Kumar wrote: On Monday, 8 October 2012 04:57:06 UTC+5:30, Stuart Sierra wrote: From the look of the source, there's no reason why - couldn't have arity-1. I guess it just doesn't come up much. Arity-1 for - would be useful to let

Re: Question on mandatory arguments for - and - macros

2012-10-12 Thread Stuart Sierra
Thank you, especially thanks for tagging it an enhancement. -S -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your

Re: Question on mandatory arguments for - and - macros

2012-10-11 Thread Shantanu Kumar
On Tuesday, 9 October 2012 06:07:06 UTC+5:30, Jason Wolfe wrote: On Sunday, October 7, 2012 9:27:15 PM UTC-7, Shantanu Kumar wrote: On Monday, 8 October 2012 04:57:06 UTC+5:30, Stuart Sierra wrote: From the look of the source, there's no reason why - couldn't have arity-1. I guess it

Re: Question on mandatory arguments for - and - macros

2012-10-11 Thread Jason Wolfe
On Thursday, October 11, 2012 10:29:57 AM UTC-7, Shantanu Kumar wrote: On Tuesday, 9 October 2012 06:07:06 UTC+5:30, Jason Wolfe wrote: On Sunday, October 7, 2012 9:27:15 PM UTC-7, Shantanu Kumar wrote: On Monday, 8 October 2012 04:57:06 UTC+5:30, Stuart Sierra wrote: From the look

Re: Question on mandatory arguments for - and - macros

2012-10-08 Thread Jason Wolfe
On Sunday, October 7, 2012 9:27:15 PM UTC-7, Shantanu Kumar wrote: On Monday, 8 October 2012 04:57:06 UTC+5:30, Stuart Sierra wrote: From the look of the source, there's no reason why - couldn't have arity-1. I guess it just doesn't come up much. Arity-1 for - would be useful to let

Re: Question on mandatory arguments for - and - macros

2012-10-07 Thread Shantanu Kumar
On Monday, 8 October 2012 04:57:06 UTC+5:30, Stuart Sierra wrote: From the look of the source, there's no reason why - couldn't have arity-1. I guess it just doesn't come up much. Arity-1 for - would be useful to let somebody comment out forms as follows: (- foo #_(bar baz) #_quux)

Question on mandatory arguments for - and - macros

2012-10-06 Thread Shantanu Kumar
Hi, I am curious about the rationale for the mandatory arguments for - and - macros. user= (doc -) - clojure.core/- ([x] [x form] [x form more]) user= (doc -) - clojure.core/- ([x form] [x form more]) For - a form is optional, but for - it is