Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.8.0-RC3

We've been running with 1.8.0-RC3 in production for over a week now without any issues. Thanks for all the work. On Wednesday, December 2, 2015 at 11:03:31 AM UTC-5, Alex Miller wrote: > > Clojure 1.8.0-RC3 is now available. *This build is a "release candidate"!* We > would appreciate any and

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.8.0-RC3

Hi, Finally had some time to try out 1.8RC3. No issues or changes in behaviour from our 1.7 production system observed in limited testing. Cheers, Ted On Tuesday, December 8, 2015 at 7:36:25 AM UTC+10, Alex Miller wrote: > > Just a reminder that this is a release candidate - that means that i

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.8.0-RC3

@Brian no, is an issue with reduce-fsm (which is fixed) https://github.com/cdorrat/reduce-fsm/issues/9 On Tuesday, December 15, 2015 at 9:42:01 AM UTC+11, Brian Marick wrote: > > Noam: does this mean it's not an issue with Midje? If it is, I'll look > into it. > > Noam Ben-Ari wrote: > > After

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.8.0-RC3

Brian: it's not an issue with Midje. On Tuesday, December 15, 2015, Brian Marick wrote: > Noam: does this mean it's not an issue with Midje? If it is, I'll look > into it. > > Noam Ben-Ari wrote: > >> After upgrading to [reduce-fsm "0.1.4"] all my tests pass with RC3 :-) >> >> On Tuesday, Decemb

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.8.0-RC3

Noam: does this mean it's not an issue with Midje? If it is, I'll look into it. Noam Ben-Ari wrote: After upgrading to [reduce-fsm "0.1.4"] all my tests pass with RC3 :-) On Tuesday, December 8, 2015 at 3:14:21 PM UTC+2, Noam Ben-Ari wrote: Thanks for the prompt response, I have filed a t

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.8.0-RC3

We also considered no issues with update to 1.8. 2015-12-11 3:19 GMT+02:00 Matthias Nehlsen : > No problems here, I updated it in all my projects and everything is > working nicely. Thanks! > > > On Wednesday, December 2, 2015 at 5:03:31 PM UTC+1, Alex Miller wrote: >> >> Clojure 1.8.0-RC3 is now

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.8.0-RC3

No problems here, I updated it in all my projects and everything is working nicely. Thanks! On Wednesday, December 2, 2015 at 5:03:31 PM UTC+1, Alex Miller wrote: > > Clojure 1.8.0-RC3 is now available. *This build is a "release candidate"!* We > would appreciate any and all testing you can do o

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.8.0-RC3

I said: We’ve had it in QA since 12/2 but it hasn’t had much of a work out yet due to various staff vacations etc. This build is our first with direct linking enabled for our whole code base. I don’t know when we’ll get it into production. We’ve decided to do no new production builds until after

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.8.0-RC3

We've been using it on our development branch without a hitch since Dec 2. On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 2:32 AM Michael Blume wrote: > No issues here. > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:39 PM James Elliott wrote: > >> I’ve been working with it for a few days and have seen no issues yet. >> >> >> On Wednes

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.8.0-RC3

No issues here. On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:39 PM James Elliott wrote: > I’ve been working with it for a few days and have seen no issues yet. > > > On Wednesday, December 2, 2015 at 10:03:31 AM UTC-6, Alex Miller wrote: > >> Clojure 1.8.0-RC3 is now available. *This build is a "release >> candidat

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.8.0-RC3

I’ve been working with it for a few days and have seen no issues yet. On Wednesday, December 2, 2015 at 10:03:31 AM UTC-6, Alex Miller wrote: > > Clojure 1.8.0-RC3 is now available. *This build is a "release candidate"!* We > would appreciate any and all testing you can do on your own libraries o

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.8.0-RC3

After upgrading to [reduce-fsm "0.1.4"] all my tests pass with RC3 :-) On Tuesday, December 8, 2015 at 3:14:21 PM UTC+2, Noam Ben-Ari wrote: > > Thanks for the prompt response, I have filed a ticket to the library > author: > > https://github.com/cdorrat/reduce-fsm/issues/9 > > On Tuesday, Decemb

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.8.0-RC3

Thanks for the prompt response, I have filed a ticket to the library author: https://github.com/cdorrat/reduce-fsm/issues/9 On Tuesday, December 8, 2015 at 3:07:34 PM UTC+2, Nicola Mometto wrote: > > Before 1.8, clojure would accept wrong forms like (throw my-exception 1 2 > 3). > > This is now

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.8.0-RC3

Hi, I have just tried 1.8.0-RC3 and saw a problem. I have a project in which I run tests with `lein midje`, and this runs fine with 1.7.0. When I change the clojure dependency to 1.8.0-RC3 and run it I get this exception: --- Exception in thread "main" java.lang.RuntimeException: Too many arg

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.8.0-RC3

Before 1.8, clojure would accept wrong forms like (throw my-exception 1 2 3). This is now an exception http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-1456. > On 8 Dec 2015, at 13:05, Noam Ben-Ari wrote: > > Hi, > I have just tried 1.8.0-RC3 and saw a problem. > > I have a project in which I run tests

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.8.0-RC3

Given how long clojure-contrib has been deprecated, I'm not going to prioritize this unless there is a specific reproducible issue that is related to 1.7 vs 1.8. On Monday, December 7, 2015 at 11:46:30 PM UTC-6, Sean Grove wrote: > > It's not super compelling for us (we can upgrade with some wo

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.8.0-RC3

tting regards direct linking (so, just clojure.core). >> >> Sean Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN >> World Singles -- http://worldsingles.com/ >> >> >> From: > on behalf of Alex Miller < >> al...@puredanger.com > >> Reply-To: > >> Date: Monday,

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.8.0-RC3

It's not super compelling for us (we can upgrade with some work), but we've run into an issue with [org.clojure/clojure-contrib "1.2.0"] when requiring clojure.contrib.math: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to resolve symbol: remainder in this context, compiling:(cloju

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.8.0-RC3

Happy to consider stuff like that, sooner better than later though. The only var in core that has been marked ^:redef so far is clojure.core/load. On Monday, December 7, 2015 at 7:47:15 PM UTC-6, Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote: > > I suspect there's a few cases where we would like to use direct link

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.8.0-RC3

gt; From: on behalf of Alex Miller < > a...@puredanger.com> > Reply-To: > Date: Monday, December 7, 2015 at 1:36 PM > To: Clojure > Subject: Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.8.0-RC3 > > Just a reminder that this is a release candidate - that means that if we > don't hear any is

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.8.0-RC3

used the default setting regards direct linking (so, just clojure.core). Sean Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN World Singles -- http://worldsingles.com/ From: on behalf of Alex Miller Reply-To: Date: Monday, December 7, 2015 at 1:36 PM To: Clojure Subject: Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.8.0-RC3 Just a

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.8.0-RC3

Re CLJ-1863, this was already problematic before 1.8 in some contexts. I would say it's undecided. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are mode

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.8.0-RC3

I have done my usual 'mvn clean test' on multiple OS/JDK combos not tested on build.clojure.org, and found nothing amiss with 1.8.0-RC3. Is http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-1863 considered problematic enough to fix before 1.8.0 goes out? Andy On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Alex Miller wr

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.8.0-RC3

Just a reminder that this is a release candidate - that means that if we don't hear any issues, we will release it as 1.8.0. If you haven't yet, please give it a try Thanks, Alex On Wednesday, December 2, 2015 at 10:03:31 AM UTC-6, Alex Miller wrote: > > Clojure 1.8.0-RC3 is now available

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.8.0-RC3

In our app we have 30% speed improvements. Although direct-linking helps us with code obfuscation. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moder

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.8.0-RC3

We believe it will make a difference in some apps and have no plans to pull it out. On Wednesday, December 2, 2015 at 3:30:16 PM UTC-6, Daniel Compton wrote: > > Has the case for Direct Linking been well established yet? I've seen a lot > of concerns about it and most benchmarks show marginal a

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.8.0-RC3

Has the case for Direct Linking been well established yet? I've seen a lot of concerns about it and most benchmarks show marginal at best performance increases. Tom Crayford ran it against his extensive performance benchmarking suite and didn't find

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.8.0-RC3

"regularly" == once per week Additionally, I do a full rebuild for each release. On Wednesday, December 2, 2015 at 10:21:45 AM UTC-6, Nicola Mometto wrote: > > all the clojure contrib libraries are regularly tested against new clojure > versions > http://build.clojure.org/ > > > On 2 Dec 2015

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.8.0-RC3

all the clojure contrib libraries are regularly tested against new clojure versions http://build.clojure.org/ > On 2 Dec 2015, at 16:17, Sreenivas Reddy T > wrote: > > I would love a project where the tool runs all test cases of libraries > against new release candidate. > > On 2 Dec 2015

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.8.0-RC3

I would love a project where the tool runs all test cases of libraries against new release candidate. On 2 Dec 2015 9:33 pm, "Alex Miller" wrote: > Clojure 1.8.0-RC3 is now available. *This build is a "release candidate"!* We > would appreciate any and all testing you can do on your own librarie