Jeff Weiss writes:
> From browsing git, it looks like the project.clj version hasn't been
> incremented in 7 months, and the fix for closures came in after that.
> If you're using serializable.fn from a maven repo, it is out of
> date, AFAICT.
Sorry about that; just pushed a new 1.1.2 version wi
I believe the latest code does capture closures properly. I haven't tested
all kinds of crazy corner cases, but it does work for all my closures.
>From browsing git, it looks like the project.clj version hasn't been
incremented in 7 months, and the fix for closures came in after that. If
you'
On 31 Mar 2012, at 00:00, Cedric Greevey wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Lee Spector wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 30, 2012, at 5:11 PM, Cedric Greevey wrote:
>>>
>>> That opens a giant can of worms. How, for example, do we discover that
>>> (partial * 2) and #(* % 2) and (fn [x] (* 2 x)) and
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Lee Spector wrote:
>
> On Mar 30, 2012, at 5:11 PM, Cedric Greevey wrote:
>>
>> That opens a giant can of worms. How, for example, do we discover that
>> (partial * 2) and #(* % 2) and (fn [x] (* 2 x)) and #(+ %1 %1) are all
>> equal? Nevermind once we get into sit
2012/3/30 Vinzent :
> Counter-example: one could write if-authenticated macro, which will take
> fixed number of args, but should be indented as normal if.
OK, check the macro structure to see if any args are incorporated as
invokable forms -- so, in arguments in special forms and macros that
are
On Mar 30, 2012, at 5:11 PM, Cedric Greevey wrote:
>
> That opens a giant can of worms. How, for example, do we discover that
> (partial * 2) and #(* % 2) and (fn [x] (* 2 x)) and #(+ %1 %1) are all
> equal? Nevermind once we get into situations like #(reduce + (map
> (constantly 1) %) equals #(l
Vinzent writes:
> Probably you slightly misunderstood what I mean. Consider this
> scenario:
> I've set up a project which uses a new library with non-standart
> indent. I've connected to swank and compiled it. Then I'm calling
> some clojure-mode-update-indent function, which walks through all
>
Counter-example: one could write if-authenticated macro, which will take
fixed number of args, but should be indented as normal if.
суббота, 31 марта 2012 г. 3:07:23 UTC+6 пользователь Cedric Greevey написал:
>
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Vinzent wrote:
> > Another idea is to put :indenta
Probably you slightly misunderstood what I mean. Consider this scenario:
I've set up a project which uses a new library with non-standart indent.
I've connected to swank and compiled it. Then I'm calling some
clojure-mode-update-indent function, which walks through all loaded
namespaces and coll
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Nathan Matthews
wrote:
> Also it bothers me that
>
> (= (partial * 2) (partial * 2))
>
> is false. Logically it shouldn't be right? If we captured the function
> forms, that would enable better equality for functions.
That opens a giant can of worms. How, for ex
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Vinzent wrote:
> Another idea is to put :indentation metadata on vars, so user-defined macros
> could be indented properly. Currently I have (define-clojure-indent ...)
> with a number of forms in my emacs config file, and it seems to be pretty
> common solution. I
Vinzent writes:
> I'm not sure how I feel about indentation rules
> changing depending on whether slime is active or not.
>
> What I was thinking, is that there'd be some function which would
> collect and save indentation metadata, so it can be used later. Thus,
> active slime connection
Nathan Matthews writes:
> I wrote some code which re-programmed the fn macro to capture the
> closures as well as the actual function form, and attach them as
> meta-data also on the actual function object.
Could you submit it as a patch to serializable-fn? It would be nice to
have everything in
>
> I'm not sure how I feel about indentation rules
> changing depending on whether slime is active or not.
>
What I was thinking, is that there'd be some function which would collect
and save indentation metadata, so it can be used later. Thus, active slime
connection required only the first t
Nathan Matthews writes:
> I wanted to serialise functions and send them over the network. The
> problem with serializable-fn is that it doesn't capture closures.
It's designed to capture closures; if it doesn't that would be an
(unsurprising) bug.
-Phil
--
You received this message because yo
Hi,
I wanted to serialise functions and send them over the network. The problem
with serializable-fn is that it doesn't capture closures.
I wrote some code which re-programmed the fn macro to capture the closures as
well as the actual function form, and attach them as meta-data also on the
ac
Vinzent writes:
> Phil, what do you think? Could it be experimentally implemented in
> clojure-mode?
No, clojure-mode determines indentation exclusively from static
heuristics. There is dynamic indentation support in slime, but I've
never looked into it; I'm not sure how I feel about indentation
Another idea is to put :indentation metadata on vars, so user-defined
macros could be indented properly. Currently I have (define-clojure-indent
...) with a number of forms in my emacs config file, and it seems to be
pretty common solution. It'd be nice to replace this hack with an
IDE-independ
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Petr Gladkikh wrote:
> I am pondering on the idea of having more (or even a lot) of metadata
> that could be useful for debugging and problem resolution.
> Since we can store anything in metadata, can we store not only source
> file path and line number but whole
19 matches
Mail list logo
