To be fair, calling from outside of Clojurescript is probably the only
use-case for this behavior that I can imagine, which is exactly what
^:export was designed (and named) for.
--
Ashton Kemerling
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Thomas Heller wrote:
> It is possible, the question is WHEN?
It is possible, the question is WHEN?
You can make a function callable by name if you export it.
(ns myns)
(def ^:export testfn []
:foo)
can be called like so, must be careful with name munging though:
(let [the-fn (aget js/window "myns" "testfn")]
(the-fn))
which also works with advanced
Any such facility is at odds with Google Closure Compiler's advanced
compilation.
David
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Timur wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> Is there a way to resolve a function or object using its string name in
> ClojureScript? I found this however it is old:
>
> http://stackover
Hi everybody,
Is there a way to resolve a function or object using its string name in
ClojureScript? I found this however it is old:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12020576/resolve-function-throws-an-error-in-clojurescript-but-not-clojure/12020663#12020663
Thanks in advance.
--
You rec
