My guess: to allow functions with :inline metadata to still be used as
higher order (first class) functions.
Note, the fn specified by :inline is more of a macro than a function, it's
called at compile time.
How would the following work without a function body?
(map pos? [-1 0 1])
definline
Yes, thank you for your reply,i total agree with you about why we need
:inline form in meta map.
But my problem is that why clojure compiler could not use the body form as
the :inline value automatically for us instead of writing a duplicate form?
I think below codes is more suitable:
(defn pos?
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:26 AM, dennis zhuang killme2...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, thank you for your reply,i total agree with you about why we need
:inline form in meta map.
But my problem is that why clojure compiler could not use the body form as
the :inline value automatically for us
But my problem is that why clojure compiler could not use the body form as
the :inline value automatically for us instead of writing a duplicate form?
I think below codes is more suitable:
It's not a duplicate form. Sure it may appear to be to those of us
with organic brains that excel at
Thanks.
Yeath,i know the defline macro,and it is the best way to define inline
function.I got your point,thanks.
2012/7/17 Aaron Cohen aa...@assonance.org
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:26 AM, dennis zhuang killme2...@gmail.com
wrote:
Yes, thank you for your reply,i total agree with you about
