Dear all,
I've got a re-implementation of the for-macro sitting around here that
removes this limitation (and others, the vector can't be empty either,
if I remember correctly). The implementation also adds the sorting and
grouping functionality described in Wadler and Jones' paper
comprehensive
From my perspective, having the forms be flatter (less nested) and
having the call to the extend-dom function be at the outermost level
is the most readable.
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Meikel Brandmeyer m...@kotka.de wrote:
Hi,
Am 23.10.2009 um 21:16 schrieb Howard Lewis Ship:
Here's
I like to try and keep my level of nesting under control, and this
often involves hiding or re-structuring the let macro. The for macro
can implicitly assemble a let macro for you, but with a limitation
that the :let clause can't be first:
1:5 user= (for [:let [z [:foo :bar]] x z] (name x))
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Howard Lewis Ship hls...@gmail.com wrote:
I like to try and keep my level of nesting under control, and this
often involves hiding or re-structuring the let macro. The for macro
can implicitly assemble a let macro for you, but with a limitation
that the :let
Hi,
Am 23.10.2009 um 21:16 schrieb Howard Lewis Ship:
Here's what I wanted to write:
(defn add-script-links-for-imported-javascript-libraries
[env dom-nodes]
(extend-dom dom-nodes [:html :head] :top
(template-for [:let [aggregation (- env :cascade :resource-
