I recently did a benchmark (admittedly in hindsight not a particularly good
one) that involved comparison of an implementation of the same small
program in
Javahttps://github.com/logicchains/ArrayAccessBench/blob/master/Java3.javaand
in
It looks like an improvement in clojure.lang.BigInt over
java.math.BigInteger - BigInt's add() method seems to do a long + long
add if it doesn't overflow
(https://github.com/clojure/clojure/blob/master/src/jvm/clojure/lang/BigInt.java#L142)
and only fall back to BigInteger's add method (which has
Hi Jonathan,
I provided the Clojure pull request btw. I think Rob's explanation is
correct.
Alex
On Tuesday, February 25, 2014 7:20:46 AM UTC-6, Rob Day wrote:
It looks like an improvement in clojure.lang.BigInt over
java.math.BigInteger - BigInt's add() method seems to do a long + long
Ah, that explanation makes sense, thank you. I imagine it would be quite
cumbersome to do the same thing in Java, due to the lack of dynamic typing.
On Tuesday, 25 February 2014 21:20:46 UTC+8, Rob Day wrote:
It looks like an improvement in clojure.lang.BigInt over
java.math.BigInteger -
