It would be fantastic if the talkes would be record. We have seen the
effects a couple of videos of rich had on the world and how many
people it led to clojure (including me).
On Aug 25, 9:36 am, Meikel Brandmeyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 19 Aug., 17:19, Sean Devlin wrote:
>
> >http://first.clojure-c
Hi,
On 19 Aug., 17:19, Sean Devlin wrote:
> http://first.clojure-conj.org/
Will the talks be recorded? Put on blip.tv? For those on the other
side of the Big Pond?
Sincerely
Meikel
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this g
On Aug 19, 2010, at 10:39 AM, Stuart Halloway wrote:
>>
>> Also, will there be cake? If this is Clojure's birthday party, there
>> had better be cake.
>
> Yes. And tea. Not necessarily served at the same time. :-)
I'd like to point out that the 23d is also my birthday. I like chocolate "mone
> Well, courtesy of HN the cat's out of the bag:
>
> http://first.clojure-conj.org/
>
> What is the ballpark price? I think this would help a lot of people
> determine if they can go.
Attendee pricing will be designed to cover attendee costs for running the
event, plus a little margin for erro
Well, courtesy of HN the cat's out of the bag:
http://first.clojure-conj.org/
What is the ballpark price? I think this would help a lot of people
determine if they can go.
Also, will there be cake? If this is Clojure's birthday party, there
had better be cake.
Just sayin'
--
You received th
Hi Mr Volkmann,
Here are my result:
user=> (println "\nconj list")
conj list
nil
user=> ; Adds to front.
user=> (build-coll '() (fn [coll i] (conj coll i)) size)
"Elapsed time: 28.09443 msecs"
nil
user=>
user=> (println "\ncons list")
cons list
nil
user=> ; Adds to front.
user=> (build-coll '(
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Chouser wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Mark Volkmann
> wrote:
>>
>> When working on a list, both cons and conj add to the front. In my
>> tests, cons is considerably faster than conj. I'm trying to figure out
>> why.
>
> In my testing they are the sam
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Mark Volkmann wrote:
>
> When working on a list, both cons and conj add to the front. In my
> tests, cons is considerably faster than conj. I'm trying to figure out
> why.
In my testing they are the same speed.
> Here's the implementation of conj.
>
> (def
> #^{
When working on a list, both cons and conj add to the front. In my
tests, cons is considerably faster than conj. I'm trying to figure out
why.
Here's the implementation of conj.
(def
#^{:arglists '([coll x] [coll x & xs])
:doc "conj[oin]. Returns a new collection with the xs
'added'. (c
