I'm not sure how else to go about contacting you about this, but I've found
some problems in pldb. The system just doesn't seem to work at all with
the core.logic 0.8.0 builds. I'm not too familiar with the guts of pldb or
core.logic, but I'm wondering if maybe some implementation changes
That's likely though pldb is so small I don't really think it would require
much in the way of changes.
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 5:15 PM, JvJ kfjwhee...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure how else to go about contacting you about this, but I've
found some problems in pldb. The system just doesn't
JvJ kfjwhee...@gmail.com writes:
I'm not sure how else to go about contacting you about this, but I've
found some problems in pldb. The system just doesn't seem to work at
all with the core.logic 0.8.0 builds. I'm not too familiar with the
guts of pldb or core.logic, but I'm
On Mar 14, 2013, at 4:15 PM, JvJ kfjwhee...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure how else to go about contacting you about this, but I've found
some problems in pldb. The system just doesn't seem to work at all with the
core.logic 0.8.0 builds. I'm not too familiar with the guts of pldb or
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Norman Richards o...@nostacktrace.comwrote:
PLDB was written against the current core.logic release. I have not yet
started testing with the 0.8 pre releases, but judging from the recent
core.logic announcement, now is probably a good time to start. :)
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 4:03 PM, JvJ kfjwhee...@gmail.com wrote:
It states that retractions aren't yet implemented. Is there any way to
delete facts?
Retractions are now supported. DB merging and cross-DB logic queries are
still coming. Feel free to comment on the github issues if you have
Thanks so much! I'll check it out tomorrow!
On Monday, 4 March 2013 10:51:48 UTC-5, Norman Richards wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 4:03 PM, JvJ kfjwh...@gmail.com javascript:wrote:
It states that retractions aren't yet implemented. Is there any way to
delete facts?
Retractions are
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 4:32 PM, JvJ kfjwhee...@gmail.com wrote:
One more thing I'd like to ask. Is it possible to combine the databases
in a way?
For instance, I'd like to have a universal database that every agent can
access, as well as agent-specific databases. I understand that
Sounds like an interesting idea though I can't give much guidance about how
to approach it. Curious to know how it goes though!
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:50 PM, JvJ kfjwhee...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm creating something with core.logic that involves multiple agents(not
the same as a clojure
Thanks for the quick reply. I guess I'll go through with my initial plan
and see what happens. Thanks.
On Wednesday, 27 February 2013 16:14:49 UTC-5, David Nolen wrote:
Sounds like an interesting idea though I can't give much guidance about
how to approach it. Curious to know how it goes
Actually, I have a quick question. How could I modify the following code
to add some metadata to he newly defined relation?
(defmacro defkrel
Macro for defining knowledge-based relations.
[nme rest]
`(defrel ~nme
~'agent
~@rest))
On Wednesday, 27 February 2013 16:17:30
Hrm, how are you going to consume that metadata?
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 4:26 PM, JvJ kfjwhee...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually, I have a quick question. How could I modify the following code
to add some metadata to he newly defined relation?
(defmacro defkrel
Macro for defining
Actually, I figured it out. I just didn't realize you had to do the #'
thing to get the meta from a function.
But! I'm basically going to write a variation of run* that binds an agent
to the first argument of any knowledge-based relations. So, if they have
something like {:knowledge true}
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:50 PM, JvJ kfjwhee...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm creating something with core.logic that involves multiple agents(not
the same as a clojure agent!) which each have distinct knowledge. I'd like
to know the best way of going about separating the knowledge base so that
it
I'm also enthusiastic about eventually replacing the current core.logic
defrel/fact stuff with this excellent work.
David
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Norman Richards o...@nostacktrace.comwrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:50 PM, JvJ kfjwhee...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm creating something
Wow. Thanks, this will probably help a lot!
On Wednesday, 27 February 2013 16:45:07 UTC-5, Norman Richards wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:50 PM, JvJ kfjwh...@gmail.com javascript:wrote:
I'm creating something with core.logic that involves multiple
agents(not the same as a clojure
It states that retractions aren't yet implemented. Is there any way to
delete facts?
On Wednesday, 27 February 2013 16:45:07 UTC-5, Norman Richards wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:50 PM, JvJ kfjwh...@gmail.com javascript:wrote:
I'm creating something with core.logic that involves
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 4:03 PM, JvJ kfjwhee...@gmail.com wrote:
It states that retractions aren't yet implemented. Is there any way to
delete facts?
This is something I want to add, and if it's something you could use now,
I'll bump up priority of getting that in. What we do is just build
If it's not too much trouble, it's something I'd like to see, but I'm sure
I can find a way around it somehow.
On Wednesday, 27 February 2013 17:08:24 UTC-5, Norman Richards wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 4:03 PM, JvJ kfjwh...@gmail.com javascript:wrote:
It states that retractions aren't
One more thing I'd like to ask. Is it possible to combine the databases in
a way?
For instance, I'd like to have a universal database that every agent can
access, as well as agent-specific databases. I understand that databases
can be modified in a purely functional way (which is great), but
20 matches
Mail list logo
