Re: implementing nth for sorted-set and sorted-map

On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Sunil S Nandihalli sunil.nandiha...@gmail.com wrote: Right now I am just seq ing it before using nth Sunil. The real oddity here is that nth doesn't seem to call seq on its argument. It probably should (for non-vector arguments). -- You received this message

implementing nth for sorted-set and sorted-map

Hello everybody, I am thinking it would be nice to have nth work for sorted-set and sorted-maps .. IMHO it makes at the least sense for sorted-set if not both .. is there a reason why this is not implemented already? Thanks, Sunil. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: implementing nth for sorted-set and sorted-map

Right now I am just seq ing it before using nth Sunil. On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Sunil S Nandihalli sunil.nandiha...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everybody, I am thinking it would be nice to have nth work for sorted-set and sorted-maps .. IMHO it makes at the least sense for sorted-set if