I'm curious, wouldn't it be possible for every ref-set to be
implicitly wrapped in a dosync? That way, you wouldn't have to
explictly wrap ref-set in a dosync for the times where you just want
to change one ref. You'd only need to explicitly call dosync when you
need to wrap more than one
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 09:13, Mark Engelberg mark.engelb...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm curious, wouldn't it be possible for every ref-set to be
implicitly wrapped in a dosync? That way, you wouldn't have to
explictly wrap ref-set in a dosync for the times where you just want
to change one ref.
On May 11, 3:13 am, Mark Engelberg mark.engelb...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm curious, wouldn't it be possible for every ref-set to be
implicitly wrapped in a dosync? That way, you wouldn't have to
explictly wrap ref-set in a dosync for the times where you just want
to change one ref. You'd only
