Hi,
yes, I think so. The destructuring should not depend on the presence or
absence of a (for a given key) unrelated option. So no matter what I do
with :as the :a, :b, etc. keys should be correctly destructured, even in
nested maps as in your example.
Kind regards
Meikel
--
You received thi
You think I should file a bug-report?
Sunil.
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Meikel Brandmeyer (kotarak)
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think this is a bug. This is the expansion without any :as clause:
>
> (let*
> [map__4496
>{:a 10, :b 20, :c {:a 30, :b 40}}
>map__4496
>(if (clojure.core/se
Hi,
I think this is a bug. This is the expansion without any :as clause:
(let*
[map__4496
{:a 10, :b 20, :c {:a 30, :b 40}}
map__4496
(if (clojure.core/seq? map__4496)
(clojure.core/apply clojure.core/hash-map map__4496)
map__4496)
map__4497
(clojure.core/get map__4496
the behaviour seems to be the same in 1.4.0
Sunil.
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Sunil S Nandihalli <
sunil.nandiha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Everybody,
> I was just wondering if the following behaviour is the right behaviour..
> can somebody comment?
>
> user>> (let [{{a :a b :b :as w} :c
Hi Everybody,
I was just wondering if the following behaviour is the right behaviour..
can somebody comment?
user>> (let [{{a :a b :b :as w} :c a1 :a b1 :b :as w} {:a 10 :b 20 :c {:a
30 :b 40}}] {:a a :b b :b1 b1 :a1 a1})
{:a 30, :b 40, :b1 40, :a1 30}
user>> (let [{{a :a b :b :as w} :c a1 :a b
