> Changed my mind and fixed this on the Clojure side [1]. Now you should be
> able to bind *err* to any old Writer you like.
>
> Stu
>
> [1]
> http://github.com/richhickey/clojure/tree/c4eb5719b0f30ea4c113e6e98a1c171c43a01abe
Just checked this out. Working fine now. Thanks!
I'll let you know if I
I have fixed it on the clojure side, so it should work with swank
1.1.0 now anyway.
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 6:49 AM, Stuart Halloway
wrote:
If there is not a principled reason swank works the way it does,
let's fix
it. I'll get to it eventually myself if nobody else does, but it
isn't nea
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 6:49 AM, Stuart Halloway
wrote:
> If there is not a principled reason swank works the way it does, let's fix
> it. I'll get to it eventually myself if nobody else does, but it isn't near
> the top of my list.
It looks like labrepl is still using swank 1.1.0. Does upgrading
Changed my mind and fixed this on the Clojure side [1]. Now you should
be able to bind *err* to any old Writer you like.
Stu
[1]
http://github.com/richhickey/clojure/tree/c4eb5719b0f30ea4c113e6e98a1c171c43a01abe
So if someone produces a fork of incanter that doesn't have the
warning (or Dav
master version of labrepl tested with ccw succesfully.
Remarks:
* The pom.xml should have xmlns etc. stuff declared at its top, so
that IDEs able to interpret it can assist people for verification,
code completion, etc.
* I still see lots of SNAPSHOT dependencies "not fixed to a
particular sna
On 6 May 2010 15:45, Craig Andera wrote:
> So if someone produces a fork of incanter that doesn't have the
> warning (or David fixes up Incanter), then the problem goes away?
I don't use Incanter and I haven't tried labrepl, but I thought David
had fixed Incanter a week or so ago to rename group-
You would have to fix *all* warnings.
If there is not a principled reason swank works the way it does, let's
fix it. I'll get to it eventually myself if nobody else does, but it
isn't near the top of my list.
Stu
So if someone produces a fork of incanter that doesn't have the
warning (or
So if someone produces a fork of incanter that doesn't have the
warning (or David fixes up Incanter), then the problem goes away?
Because the other place I see the warnings coming out of is swank
itself.
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Stuart Halloway
wrote:
> This is another variant of the "Swan
This is another variant of the "Swank likes StringWriters, everybody
else likes PrintWriters" problem, see e.g. [1]
I would love to see somebody fix this, and I think it is simpler (and
probably conceptually correct) to make swank use a PrintWriter,
instead of requiring all possible tools t
Update: Using the latest labrepl commit (fa89411ae "use private
compojure snapshot"), I'm now able to pull in incanter and use it
(albeit with tons of warnings about group-by and flatten from both
incanter and swank)...but only if I use script/repl via inferior-lisp.
I still can't get swank to work
Let me know if you need me to make any changes.
David
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Stuart Halloway
wrote:
> I'll have a fix up within a half hour that should require *no* changes to
> incanter.
>
>> On 5 May 2010 14:26, Craig Andera wrote:
>>>
I have updated the labrepl [1] to use the l
I'll have a fix up within a half hour that should require *no* changes
to incanter.
On 5 May 2010 14:26, Craig Andera wrote:
I have updated the labrepl [1] to use the latest clojure 1.2 and
contrib 1.2
snapshots. Also, most of the dependencies are now frozen to specific
snapshot timestam
On 5 May 2010 14:26, Craig Andera wrote:
>
> > I have updated the labrepl [1] to use the latest clojure 1.2 and contrib 1.2
> > snapshots. Also, most of the dependencies are now frozen to specific
> > snapshot timestamps (the project.clj file may be of interest to people
> > living
> > on the dev
Nevermind, I am seeing what Craig sees. Found the issue and am on it.
Stu
Against the same commit I just did: lein clean; lein deps. After
which both script/repl and script/swank run fine (albeit with lots
of the new "WARNING: group-by already refers to:") warnings.
Here's exactly what "le
Against the same commit I just did: lein clean; lein deps. After which
both script/repl and script/swank run fine (albeit with lots of the
new "WARNING: group-by already refers to:") warnings.
Here's exactly what "lein deps" installed in the lib. Craig: do you
see the same?
-rw-r--r-- 1
> I have updated the labrepl [1] to use the latest clojure 1.2 and contrib 1.2
> snapshots. Also, most of the dependencies are now frozen to specific
> snapshot timestamps (the project.clj file may be of interest to people living
> on the development edge).
>
> After a "lein clean; lein deps" ever
Can you send your .project and .classpath files, for analysis ? (Place
them in the files section of the google group, please)
2010/5/1 Keno :
> I'm getting this error in Eclipse:
>
> Clojure 1.2.0-master-SNAPSHOT
> 1:1 user=> * (require 'labrepl)
> * (labrepl/-main)
> #
> java.lang.Exceptio
More than one clojure or contrib jar file one the classpath, perhaps.
Can you try starting the labrepl from the command line and see if you
get the same error?
Stu
I'm getting this error in Eclipse:
Clojure 1.2.0-master-SNAPSHOT
1:1 user=> * (require 'labrepl)
* (labrepl/-main)
#
ja
I'm getting this error in Eclipse:
Clojure 1.2.0-master-SNAPSHOT
1:1 user=> * (require 'labrepl)
* (labrepl/-main)
#
java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError (control.clj:9)
1:2 user=> #
1:3 user=> java.lang.Exception: No such var: labrepl/-main (repl-1:2)
Do you maybe have an idea what I'm
I'm getting an error using labrepl in Eclipse. I followed these
instructions:
http://www.assembla.com/wiki/show/clojure/Getting_Started_with_Eclipse_and_Counterclockwise.
This is what I get:
Clojure 1.2.0-master-SNAPSHOT
1:1 user=> * (require 'labrepl)
* (labrepl/-main)
#
java.lang.Except
I have updated the labrepl [1] to use the latest clojure 1.2 and
contrib 1.2 snapshots. Also, most of the dependencies are now frozen
to specific snapshot timestamps (the project.clj file may be of
interest to people living on the development edge).
After a "lein clean; lein deps" everythi
21 matches
Mail list logo
