Hi Wilker,
I experienced the same using datomic.api/connect while experimenting with
datomic-pro
(0.9.4815.12) and Clojure 1.7.0-alpha2.
Dropping back to Clojure 1.6.0 fixed the issue.
(Datomic releases targeted Clojure 1.5 until Aug 31, 2014, and now target
Clojure 1.6) [1]
Shaun
[1]
On Tuesday, August 26, 2014 1:41:45 PM UTC+2, DomKM wrote:
I'm in Prague for a couple weeks. Any locals want to grab a beer and chat
about Clojure[Script]?
There's a meetup tomorrow gathering people interested in FP in general and
Clojure in particular.
If you fancy, information is there:
Announcing the release of Async Ring! Ring is a great foundation for
building HTTP servers in Clojure. However, Ring fails to solve many
problems that high-performance and transactional HTTP servers must solve:
- What does the server do when it can't handle the request rate?
- How can the
How does this compare/contrast with Pedestal. Seems like there might be
some overlap here?
Timothy
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 9:24 AM, David Greenberg dsg123456...@gmail.com
wrote:
Announcing the release of Async Ring! Ring is a great foundation for
building HTTP servers in Clojure. However, Ring
There seems to be a
https://github.com/dgrnbrg/async-ring#comparison-with-pedestal section in
the README
2014-09-09 16:34 GMT+01:00 Timothy Baldridge tbaldri...@gmail.com:
How does this compare/contrast with Pedestal. Seems like there might be
some overlap here?
Timothy
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014
Hi David,
This looks very interesting, however I'd like to request that you change
the name to make it clear this project isn't an official part of Ring.
Usually I don't mind if a library uses Ring in its name, but in this case
it seems like there could be a future source of confusion if Ring
Excuse my ignorance but does volatile! have anything to do with Java's
volatile keyword? Is there any relation at all? I'm not suggesting a name
change, but it can be confusing coming from that angle. Maybe a blurb in
the doc string?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
2014-09-09 18:54 GMT+02:00 Brent Millare brent.mill...@gmail.com:
Excuse my ignorance but does volatile! have anything to do with Java's
volatile keyword? Is there any relation at all? I'm not suggesting a name
change, but it can be confusing coming from that angle. Maybe a blurb in
the doc
The keyword has different meaning
depending on the language and
context.
Most of the time to prevent optimizations by the compiler to insure write
ordering
and some consistent view (Java use).
Not here. It's meant to warn that
nothing is guaranteed, no synchronization, no consistent view.
It
Async Ring has been renamed to Spiral, a Ring that doesn't block, to avoid
future confusion.
On Tuesday, September 9, 2014 12:50:00 PM UTC-4, James Reeves wrote:
Hi David,
This looks very interesting, however I'd like to request that you change
the name to make it clear this project isn't
Async Ring has been renamed to Spiral, a Ring that doesn't block, to avoid
future confusion.
On Tuesday, September 9, 2014 12:50:11 PM UTC-4, James Reeves wrote:
Hi David,
This looks very interesting, however I'd like to request that you change
the name to make it clear this project isn't
*Clojure/conj - Nov 20-22, 2014*
Warner Theater - Washington, DC
http://clojure-conj.org/
Tickets https://www.eventbrite.com/e/clojureconj-2014-tickets-12388174363:
$350
Training
http://www.eventbrite.com/e/dc-clojure-training-intro-to-clojure-datomic-tickets-1268741:
Intro to Clojure (2 days,
No, it means exactly the same thing as volatile in Java (and is implemented
in the Volatile Java class which holds a single volatile field). Basically
a volatile box since a field must exist inside a class. The semantics are
the same as Java - writes are guaranteed to be seen by subsequent
A fix for this has been applied to Clojure master for the next release (no
plan for when that will be yet, but probably ~weeks).
On Monday, September 8, 2014 11:18:56 PM UTC-5, Wilker wrote:
Actually, I just got an answer on the Datomic list, the problem is that
I'm using Clojure
Looks useful.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send
Great, I just wonder how you evaluate the performance, how many
concurrences? how many requests?
On Tuesday, September 9, 2014 11:25:04 PM UTC+8, dgrnbrg wrote:
Announcing the release of Async Ring! Ring is a great foundation for
building HTTP servers in Clojure. However, Ring fails to solve
I've encountered a couple of use cases where it would helpful to have some
form of remote function invocation in Clojure/ClojureScript with the
following characteristics:
- Arbitrary functions can be effectively serialised and sent to remote
machines
- Remote functions can be invoked either
17 matches
Mail list logo
