After using it all weekend, everything looks good for me. Thanks!
On Wednesday, June 17, 2015 at 12:44:39 PM UTC-5, Alex Miller wrote:
Clojure 1.7.0-RC2 is now available.
Try it via
- Download: https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/clojure/clojure/1.7.0-RC2/
- Leiningen: [org.clojure/clojure
Just a couple of comments:
As I was typing, Mars0i's message came in, with much of much what I wanted
to say about documentation, but I'll reiterate a couple of key points: You
can have an intuitive API that's poorly documented, just as it's possible
to have a terrible API with great
Here are some functional programming job opportunities that were posted
recently:
Junior full stack developer at Maestro
http://functionaljobs.com/jobs/8835-junior-full-stack-developer-at-maestro
Clojure Engineer at Funding Circle
CLJS outputs valid ES3 code, but string.prototype.normalizer is API, and
can be added with a polyfill. That said, I don't really like code that
depends on polyfills to function, so another solution would be preferred,
especially since ES6 isn't that supported yet.
søndag 21. juni 2015 17.23.37
As for performance benchmarks, I have to echo Mike that it seemed strange
to me that you were claiming you were faster on ALL benchmarks when I'd
only seen data on one. Would you mind sharing your full benchmarking
analyses?
I think this might be a very important issue, and I am glad
(For the record I don't think it's fair to criticize core.matrix as not
being an API because the documentation is limited. The API is in the
protocols, etc.
The problem with that view (for me, anyway) is that only a portion of an
API could be captured with protocols, and that is even an
Seems like the Prefix cannot be null is still a problem.
Do anyone have a solution to this?
I am trying to roundtrip inkscape-svg to be exact.
It happens to contain a whole lot of namespaces.
Smallest example: (- test.svg slurp clojure.data.xml/parse-str
clojure.data.xml/emit-str)
On Thu, Oct
core.matrix claims that it is fast on its project page (with which I agree
in some cases). I expected from that, and from the last couple of your
posts in this discussion, that there are some concrete numbers to show,
which I can't find.
My claim to win ALL benchmarks (excluding maybe tiny
For example:
(:require [clojure.java.io :as io])
vs
(:use [clojure.java.io :as io])
In both cases, we can end up using it with (io/function name ... ). Is
there a difference at all?
Thanks
Ritchie
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To
Since you mentioned GitHub, have you looked at Git Large File Storage?
https://github.com/blog/1986-announcing-git-large-file-storage-lfs
On Monday, June 22, 2015 at 4:09:31 PM UTC-4, Mohit Thatte wrote:
AWS S3 is a great place to put large files
On Jun 22, 2015, at 1:50 PM, Ritchie Cai ritchie...@gmail.com wrote:
For example:
(:require [clojure.java.io :as io])
vs
(:use [clojure.java.io :as io])
In both cases, we can end up using it with (io/function name ... ). Is
there a difference at all?
Yes, (:use [clojure.java.io :as io])
Ok, so require without :refer will default to :refer :all?
On Jun 22, 2015, at 4:32 PM, Sean Corfield s...@corfield.org wrote:
On Jun 22, 2015, at 2:22 PM, Ritchie Cai ritchie...@gmail.com wrote:
You mean (:use [clojure.java.io]) is equivalent to (:require
[clojure.java.io :as io :refer
Thanks, exactly what i needed
On Monday, June 22, 2015 at 1:01:30 AM UTC+3, Sean Corfield wrote:
How about this:
(defmacro matches [value pattern]
`(is (match ~value ~pattern true :else false)
(str (match ~value '~pattern
(let [a {:x 2}]
(matches a
Hi Alex
Has Cognitect had any further discussion on this/do you have anything to
share?
Thanks, Daniel.
On Monday, May 4, 2015 at 3:04:17 PM UTC+12, Alex Miller wrote:
Re gsoc, last year Cognitect was a receiving organization for the funds
and distributed them to students for travel to
You mean (:use [clojure.java.io]) is equivalent to (:require [clojure.java.io
:as io :refer :all])?
Ritchie
On Jun 22, 2015, at 4:15 PM, Sean Corfield s...@corfield.org wrote:
On Jun 22, 2015, at 1:50 PM, Ritchie Cai ritchie...@gmail.com wrote:
For example:
(:require [clojure.java.io :as
On Jun 22, 2015, at 2:39 PM, Ritchie Cai ritchie...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, so require without :refer will default to :refer :all?
No.
(:use [clojure.java.io]) is equivalent to (:require [clojure.java.io :refer
:all])
There’s no :as here. :use is like :require :refer :all.
(:use
The usual XML-processing options that are open in Java, are still open in
Clojure. You may use JAXP or StAX for applications that outwit clojure.xml.
By the way, there is a feature enhancement page about this at
http://dev.clojure.org/display/DXML/Namespaced+XML
How do you feel about the
Here's another benchmark for comparison:
https://code.google.com/p/redsvd/wiki/English
-A
On Monday, June 22, 2015 at 12:27:57 PM UTC-7, Dragan Djuric wrote:
core.matrix claims that it is fast on its project page (with which I agree
in some cases). I expected from that, and from the last
Hi all,
I've just released an early version of 'Yo-yo', a protocol-less, function
composition-based alternative to Component. It's still in its early stages,
so feedback would be very much appreciated!
https://github.com/james-henderson/yoyo
Yo-yo was also an experiment to see what could be
Ah, I see. I thought “use :as” will not intern all the symbols into current
namespace, apparently that’s not the case.
Thanks for clearing this up.
Ritchie
On Jun 22, 2015, at 4:52 PM, Sean Corfield s...@corfield.org wrote:
On Jun 22, 2015, at 2:39 PM, Ritchie Cai ritchie...@gmail.com
As it is a *sparse matrix*, C++ library unavailable on JVM, I don't
consider it relevant for comparison as these are really apples and
pineapples. For now, at least.
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 12:13 AM, A aael...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's another benchmark for comparison:
Hi Dragan,
The situation as I see it:
- You've created a matrix library that performs well on one benchmark
(dense matrix multiplication).
- Neanderthal meets your own personal use cases. Great job!
- Neanderthal *doesn't* fit the use cases of many others (e.g. some need a
portable pure JVM
On Monday, June 22, 2015 at 2:02:19 AM UTC+2, Mikera wrote:
There is nothing fundamentally wrong with BLAS/LAPACK, it just isn't
suitable as a general purpose array programming API. See my comments
further below.
I was discussing it from the *matrix API* perspective. My comments follow:
Thanks for the ping - I don't think I ever heard anything back but I will
ping again.
Alex
On Monday, June 22, 2015 at 3:26:57 PM UTC-5, Daniel Compton wrote:
Hi Alex
Has Cognitect had any further discussion on this/do you have anything to
share?
Thanks, Daniel.
On Monday, May 4, 2015
On Jun 22, 2015, at 2:22 PM, Ritchie Cai ritchie...@gmail.com wrote:
You mean (:use [clojure.java.io]) is equivalent to (:require [clojure.java.io
:as io :refer :all])?
Not quite, (:use [clojure.java.io]) is equivalent to (:require [clojure.java.io
:refer :all])
Sean Corfield -- (904)
For benchmarking, there's this:
https://github.com/mikera/core.matrix.benchmark. It's pretty simple though.
It would be nice to see something more robust and composable, and with
nicer output options. I'll put a little bit of time into that now, but
again, a bit busy to do as much as I'd like here
So, there are exactly two measurements there: matrix multiplication and
vector addition for dimension 100 (which is quite small and should favor
vectorz). Here are the results on my machine:
Matrix multiplications are given at the neanderthal web site
at
This is more of Java eco-system/development question, but I am curious what
folks in the Clojure community might regard as best practice. Up till now
most of the projects that I've worked on we've been able to share resources
informally via scp and email, or via Github, but on the current
Well, we also weren't claiming to win ALL benchmarks compared to anything
:-)
But your point is well taken, better benchmarking should be pretty valuable
to the community moving forward.
Chris
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Dragan Djuric draga...@gmail.com wrote:
So, there are exactly two
AWS S3 is a great place to put large files
https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/amazon-s3-object-size-limit/. You can
use S3 sync http://docs.aws.amazon.com/cli/latest/reference/s3/sync.html
to keep things current.
~Mohit
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Lawrence Krubner lawre...@rollioforce.com
This might be a bit of a strange or off-topic segue but it got me thinking.
Is there an idiomatic way to handle optional dependencies in Clojure?
Ideally, this macro would be a part of core.match itself (submit a pull
request, get it merged, and whatnot). Of course, you don't want core.match
Hi--
The code in question is a solution to http://www.4clojure.com/problem/58
(write a function that does function composition, without using 'comp').
The solution I'm trying to understand is by amalloy:
(defn mycomp [ fs]
(reduce (fn [f g]
#(f (apply g %)))
fs))
For
Hi Mike,
On Monday, June 22, 2015 at 1:56:46 PM UTC+2, Mikera wrote:
Hi Dragan,
The situation as I see it:
- You've created a matrix library that performs well on one benchmark
(dense matrix multiplication).
It performs well on all benchmarks, even BLAS 1 vector stuff is faster than
Dear fellow Clojurians,
ClojuTRE 2015 will take place Friday, September 11th 2015, in Tampere,
Finland.
ClojuTRE is a free Clojure conference organised by Metosin. The event has
single track, late start, short talks and an awesome after party for
networking, discussions and beer. We welcome
Just a quick addition, if it is still not clear what I mean regarding the
documentation. Look at this fairly recent question on stack overflow:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19982466/matrix-multiplication-in-core-matrix
On Tuesday, January 13, 2015 at 2:13:13 AM UTC+1, Dragan Djuric wrote:
It may be that there's agreement on everything that matters. Dragan,
you've said that you wouldn't mind others integrating Neanderthal into
core.matrix, but that you don't want to do that. That you are willing to
work with others on this is probably all that's needed. People may have
36 matches
Mail list logo
