Re: Clojure docstring style

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016, at 06:36 AM, naren...@helpshift.com wrote: > Is there a convention to be followed for referring the parameters of > a function in the docstring, e.g. for emacs lisp we upcase the > parameter name? Uppercase is (or was) also pretty standard style in Common Lisp. In Clojure

Re: Clojure docstring style

Is there a convention to be followed for referring the parameters of a function in the docstring, e.g. for emacs lisp we upcase the parameter name? On Sunday, May 15, 2016 at 11:12:11 PM UTC+5:30, cskksc wrote: > > Hello, > We are working on a new feature in CIDER which would parse a docstring

Re: core.async top use cases

You're probably right, I was confusing actors with agents. On Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at 7:05:19 PM UTC-7, Matan Safriel wrote: > > Actually, I am not sure clojure implements the actor model, which I can > only construe as the Erlang actor model here. I am almost certain the core > language

Re: Clojure docstring style

On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 9:54:23 AM UTC-4, Eli Naeher wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016, at 06:36 AM, nare...@helpshift.com > wrote: > > Is there a convention to be followed for referring the parameters of a > function in the docstring, e.g. for emacs lisp we upcase the parameter name?

Re: Clojure docstring style

On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 1:10:37 PM UTC-4, John Gabriele wrote: > > On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 9:54:23 AM UTC-4, Eli Naeher wrote: >> >> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016, at 06:36 AM, nare...@helpshift.com wrote: >> >> Is there a convention to be followed for referring the parameters of a

Re: [ANN] beta.clojars.org: new Clojars infrastructure that needs testing

On Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at 7:17:55 PM UTC-4, Daniel Compton wrote: > > Hi folks > > We’re moving the Clojars infrastructure from Linode to the very kind folks > at Rackspace. {snip} > Thanks, sounds like a lot of work. Any particular reasons for the switch? -- You received this message

Re: [ANN] beta.clojars.org: new Clojars infrastructure that needs testing

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 2:05 PM, John Gabriele wrote: > On Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at 7:17:55 PM UTC-4, Daniel Compton wrote: >> >> Hi folks >> >> We’re moving the Clojars infrastructure from Linode to the very kind folks >> at Rackspace. {snip} > > > Thanks, sounds like a

Clojure 1.9.0-alpha12 breaks REPL for counterclockwise

I am using Counterclockwise (Clojure plugin for Eclipse) 0.35.0.STABLE001 ccw.feature.feature.group Counterclockwise in Eclipse Version: Neon Release (4.6.0) Build id: 20160613-1800 If I use Clojure 1.8.0 in my project, the REPL starts and connects just fine. If I switch to 1.9.0-alpha12,

[ANN] Leiningen 2.7.1

Hi fellow Clojurians, I am happy to announce Leiningen 2.7.1! This release contains bugfixes to managed dependencies, and an alternative installation option: Users who use SDKMAN! can now install Leiningen by issuing `sdk install leiningen`. The list of changes since 2.7.0:

Re: Clojure docstring style

Backticks are turned into links in cider-doc so I do this only for other definitions. To refer to arguments in a batch, I use: varname- description varname2 - description2 I am not using anything for inline references to function parameters. But it would have been great if there was a

Re: In clojure.spec, how to declare all valid keys in a map

Nice, thanks. I had not thought to use map-of for this. And, s/merge certainly helps too. The only remaining issue for me is that this requires supplying the list of keys twice. AI think this case is general enough that it is worth extending the s/keys macro to support: (s/keys :req [::a ::b]

Re: [ANN] beta.clojars.org: new Clojars infrastructure that needs testing

> > Thanks, sounds like a lot of work. Any particular reasons for the switch? > > Yep it was :) One more reason for moving is that we’re not comfortable with Linode’s security. -- — Daniel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to