On Friday, 23 June 2017 23:14:55 UTC+1, lawrence...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> I'm curious if folks think it is easier to work with Emacs on a Linux
> machine, or on a Mac?
>
> I use Emacs on Mac, Linux and Windows. I disagree that it's more difficult
to use on the Mac vs Linux. On Windows I get my
Spacemacs is worth a look for a very different emacs experience. Used with
emacs from homebrew and macports (at different times :-)). If you are
heavily invested in your own init.el then maybe not as a full time
replacement but it is worth a look for its evil, which-key and hydra config
alone.
On
Hi,
I'm doing a little write-up on Java basics and comparing some of them
to Clojure (things like mutable shared state, side effects and so
on). When I came to "numbers" I was surprised by some of the things I
found in Clojure.
(== (double 0.5) (float 0.5)) ;; -> true
(== (double 0.2)
On Saturday, June 24, 2017 at 3:36:21 AM UTC-5, henrik42 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm doing a little write-up on Java basics and comparing some of them
> to Clojure (things like mutable shared state, side effects and so
> on). When I came to "numbers" I was surprised by some of the things I
> found in
Thanks for the suggestions! Daniel's code helped me a lot, thanks!
One thing that had me stuck for a while is that you have to have a Clojure
jar in your classpath. I also worked through a different way, using an
uberjar of a Clojure project. I posted my guides here
Clojure's behavior is the intended behavior in Clojure.
I'll leave the choice of what to do in ClojureScript up to David.
Btw, I believe there actually is a case* in Clojure already which is part of
the implementation details.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Amusingly, ClojureScript's "case" works more like the way I always expect
"case" to work. A "case" in Clojure that did what I meant with Java
public-static-final constants would be lovely, lovely. ClojureScript's
"case" is tasty candy!
And now with cljc, those tasty "case" forms are going
