Re: Access to overloaded java method in org.jscience.physics.amount.Amount

2008-09-16 Thread markm
On Sep 16, 7:51 am, Rich Hickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... The workaround I came up with fails to filter the bridge method in org.jscience.physics.amount.Amount. I'm still looking into this issue. http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages/browse_frm/thread/a64c75... Rich Below is

Re: 20080916 Release

2008-09-16 Thread Randall R Schulz
://clojure.blogspot.com/2008/09/20080916-release.html Rich Randall Schulz --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from

Re: 20080916 Release

2008-09-16 Thread Rich Hickey
On Sep 16, 10:15 am, Randall R Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday 16 September 2008 07:00, Rich Hickey wrote: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=137961 Added: validators for vars/refs/agents, delay/force, isa-based multimethods and a la carte hierarchies,

Re: Generate exposers for ancestral fields

2008-09-16 Thread Rich Hickey
On Sep 16, 11:12 am, Matt Revelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rich, Should I send in a CA and add ancestry verification and error handling or is this an unacceptable change? I'm amenable to the idea, but I haven't looked at the specifics, holding off on changes pre-release. Please do send in

Re: Clojure Poll 09/2008

2008-09-16 Thread Chouser
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 4:49 AM, Alexander Kjeldaas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2. Clojure states that it has good support for list comprehensions. Maybe I'm misunderstanding list comprehensions, but I'm not completely happy. I want a way to have destructuring work on the sequence, not on the

Re: Clojure Poll 09/2008

2008-09-16 Thread Randall R Schulz
On Wednesday 10 September 2008 13:39, Randall R Schulz wrote: On Wednesday 10 September 2008 11:40, Rich Hickey wrote: As we rapidly approach 500 members on the group (!) I thought it would be a good time to conduct another poll: What are you doing with Clojure? Tinkering.

porting Practical Common Lisp examples to Clojure

2008-09-16 Thread Stuart Halloway
Hi all, I am porting [1] the Practical Common Lisp examples [2] to Clojure, and blogging notes [3] as I go. Feedback of all kinds is most welcome, and I hope that some folks here will find this useful. Cheers, Stuart [1] http://github.com/stuarthalloway/practical-cl-clojure [2]

Re: Clojure Poll 09/2008

2008-09-16 Thread J. McConnell
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Randall R Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to add: 2) Balanced-boundary (non-EOL-terminated) comments. Whether the syntax is #| ... |# (á là Common Lisp) or /* ... */ (C- and Java-like) or something else, I don't much care, but I think both

Re: Clojure Poll 09/2008

2008-09-16 Thread J. McConnell
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Allen Rohner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is one weakness with the comment macro; the Reader has to be happy with the body of the comment. Including things like # in the comment body can upset the reader and cause your file to not compile. Yeah, that

RE: vs. Erlang

2008-09-16 Thread Raoul Duke
http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/2865#comment-42428 maybe an approach which would be a not-very-big-diff-to-Clojure to get distributed computing. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To