On Sep 16, 7:51 am, Rich Hickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
The workaround I came up with fails to filter the bridge method in
org.jscience.physics.amount.Amount. I'm still looking into this issue.
http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages/browse_frm/thread/a64c75...
Rich
Below is
://clojure.blogspot.com/2008/09/20080916-release.html
Rich
Randall Schulz
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from
On Sep 16, 10:15 am, Randall R Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 16 September 2008 07:00, Rich Hickey wrote:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=137961
Added: validators for vars/refs/agents, delay/force, isa-based
multimethods and a la carte hierarchies,
On Sep 16, 11:12 am, Matt Revelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rich,
Should I send in a CA and add ancestry verification and error handling
or is this an unacceptable change?
I'm amenable to the idea, but I haven't looked at the specifics,
holding off on changes pre-release. Please do send in
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 4:49 AM, Alexander Kjeldaas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. Clojure states that it has good support for list comprehensions.
Maybe I'm misunderstanding list comprehensions, but I'm not completely
happy. I want a way to have destructuring work on the sequence, not
on the
On Wednesday 10 September 2008 13:39, Randall R Schulz wrote:
On Wednesday 10 September 2008 11:40, Rich Hickey wrote:
As we rapidly approach 500 members on the group (!) I thought it
would be a good time to conduct another poll:
What are you doing with Clojure?
Tinkering.
Hi all,
I am porting [1] the Practical Common Lisp examples [2] to Clojure,
and blogging notes [3] as I go. Feedback of all kinds is most welcome,
and I hope that some folks here will find this useful.
Cheers,
Stuart
[1] http://github.com/stuarthalloway/practical-cl-clojure
[2]
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Randall R Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to add:
2) Balanced-boundary (non-EOL-terminated) comments. Whether the syntax
is #| ... |# (á là Common Lisp) or /* ... */ (C- and Java-like) or
something else, I don't much care, but I think both
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Allen Rohner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is one weakness with the comment macro; the Reader has to be
happy with the body of the comment. Including things like # in the
comment body can upset the reader and cause your file to not compile.
Yeah, that
http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/2865#comment-42428
maybe an approach which would be a not-very-big-diff-to-Clojure to get
distributed computing.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Clojure group.
To
10 matches
Mail list logo