Matt Raible - Spring Expert and Java consultant posted the following
entry to Twitter:
Why is Clojure better than Scala or Groovy?
http://twitter.com/mraible/status/7793457551
He went on to say:
Let's try that again: I like Scala and Groovy and see no compelling
reason to learn Clojure. Am I
Hi,
Am 16.01.2010 um 01:48 schrieb Scott Burson:
Certainly, this is a very common idiom in Common Lisp and other older
dialects. I guess there are a few people who don't like it, but a lot
of us do it routinely. You'll even see stuff like
(or (try-to-construct-a-foo)
(error
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Konrad Hinsen
konrad.hin...@fastmail.net wrote:
On 11 Jan 2010, at 23:09, .Bill Smith wrote:
Every class object has a newInstance method:
user= (Class/forName java.util.HashMap)
java.util.HashMap
user= (.newInstance (Class/forName java.util.HashMap))
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:22 PM, ataggart alex.tagg...@gmail.com wrote:
Some people have had issues with c.c.logging in that it looks for a
suitable logging implementation at macro-expansion-time (by simply
trying to import the necessary classes), which thus also occurs during
AOT
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Julian juliangam...@gmail.com wrote:
Matt Raible - Spring Expert and Java consultant posted the following
entry to Twitter:
Why is Clojure better than Scala or Groovy?
http://twitter.com/mraible/status/7793457551
He went on to say:
Let's try that again: I
On Jan 16, 6:17 am, Rich Hickey richhic...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:22 PM, ataggart alex.tagg...@gmail.com wrote:
Some people have had issues with c.c.logging in that it looks for a
suitable logging implementation at macro-expansion-time (by simply
trying to import the
2010/1/15 Rayne disciplera...@gmail.com:
Ignore this. ;)
deftype and reify and all of that good stuff are now in the Clojure
master branch. Rich pulled new into master a few days ago.
Ah, good to know :)
The last time I checked it was not yet in master.
--
Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com
One third main selling point, just for you ;-) :
Clojure has a rooted in it a development paradigm suited to manage
state of identities over time.
That is, clojure embraces the functional paradigm for most of the
development process, but does not leave you naked when time comes to
write those
On Saturday 16 January 2010 18:10:15 Shantanu Kumar wrote:
The best benefit of Clojure is, I think, the power-to-weight ratio.
That's a really good description for a low barrier to entry. :-)
--
Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e
--
You received this
For the non lazy version , maybe using clojure.zip would help not blow
up the stack ?
(using clojure.zip/zip + a loop with recur on clojure.zip/next) ?
2010/1/15 Nicolas Buduroi nbudu...@gmail.com:
Hi, I'm still not familiar with laziness and I'm trying to make a
function recursively walk
On Jan 15, 1:44 pm, Nicolas Buduroi nbudu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 15, 3:25 pm, Sean Devlin francoisdev...@gmail.com wrote:
Did you try wrapping everything w/ a call to lazy-seq?
Yes, it doesn't seem change anything.
I suspect that just wrapping everything in a call to lazy-seq cannot
Sorry, I forgot to ask: how rapid is rapidly?
Can you provide a simple example that rapidly blows the stack
so we can experiment with lazy solutions?
-tom
On Jan 15, 1:21 pm, Nicolas Buduroi nbudu...@gmail.com wrote:
But it blow up the stack quite rapidly, ...
...
- budu
--
You
On Jan 16, 4:01 am, mac markus.gustavs...@gmail.com wrote:
I am just now in a situation where I have to do some swing programming
and this seems like it has great potential!
Since it's already version 1.0 you should put it on Clojars so that it
is easier to use from leiningen or maven etc.
On Jan 15, 1:21 pm, Nicolas Buduroi nbudu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I'm still not familiar with laziness and I'm trying to make a
function recursively walk arbitrary data structures to perform some
action on all strings. The non-lazy version is quite easy to do:
(use
'clojure.walk
14 matches
Mail list logo
