Perfect!
Had been waiting for some thing like this, and I followed the first two
parts - worked flawlessly!
Thanks!
--
jaju
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 8:59 PM, Mimmo Cosenza mimmo.cose...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I started a short series of tutorials on ClojureScript that I'm writing in
my spare
Thanx jaju…
I'll try my best to go on with modern cljs tutorial in my spare time. I just
published the 4th tutorial (form validation). Hope to be useful and fun.
Mimmo
On Nov 7, 2012, at 9:14 AM, Ravindra Jaju ravindra.j...@gmail.com wrote:
Perfect!
Had been waiting for some thing like
This looks really promising.
One question: when one builds modern-cljs, is there any extra configuration
needed for getting the clojurescript compiler up and running? I get a
java.lang.String cannot be cast to clojure.lang.Associative when doing $
lein buildcljs once, which I don't really know
On Nov 7, 2012, at 11:44 AM, Linus Ericsson wrote:
Nah, just forgot the vector in :cljsbuild {:builds *[* {:source ...} *]*
:-)
anyway to run the tutorials without code yourself just follow this steps
1. clone the git repository:
$ git clone https://github.com/magomimmo/modern-cljs.git
2.
Hi,
I'm a total newb and I'd like to play around with ClojureScript to learn it
and maybe build something with it. However starting/configuring a project
is difficult and I want 3 things - (1) a mixed clojure/clojurescript
project + (2) a way to automatically compile the files on changes + (3)
2012/11/7 Alexandru Nedelcu m...@alexn.org
Hi,
I'm a total newb and I'd like to play around with ClojureScript to learn
it and maybe build something with it. However starting/configuring a
project is difficult and I want 3 things - (1) a mixed
clojure/clojurescript project + (2) a way to
Hi,
I was thinking about multimethods and the flexibility given by being able
to dispatch on the value of an arbitrary function of the arguments,
instead of just the class of the first argument as in Java. It seems to me
that we could be even more flexible if each method implementation
was
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Matt Ridsdale mridsd...@gmail.com wrote:
that we could be even more flexible if each method implementation
was associated with a predicate function of the args, instead of being
associated with a fixed dispatch value. See the below code for an example of
ah, so
I know I'm coming a bit late in this thread but i did not have the
chance to reply earlier...
Can somebody elaborate briefly what is the problem with the combination
of with-open/doseq/line-seq? In a project of mine I'm dealing with files
larger than 200MB (which of course will not even open
There aren't any problems with with-open/doseq/line-seq. The issue is
with with-open/line-seq. For example, it's instinctive (at least for
me anyway) to want to write a function like this:
(defn get-records [file-name]
(with-open [r (reader file-name)]
(line-seq r)))
Of course, the problem
Hi Dave,
Am 07.11.2012 um 20:09 schrieb Dave Ray:
There aren't any problems with with-open/doseq/line-seq. The issue is
with with-open/line-seq. For example, it's instinctive (at least for
me anyway) to want to write a function like this:
(defn get-records [file-name]
(with-open [r
aaa ok this is clearer now...I guess I never wanted/tried to do that -
it seems plain weird to me since I know that there is a try/finally
hidden in there and escaping its scope will render the stream useless by
closing it. anyway thanks for the quick and clear response :)
If you 're dealing
Hi Alexandru,
I don't know if it's what your're looking for. I just started trying to be
helpful for this kind of quick start guide.
you can find it at
https://github.com/magomimmo/modern-cljs
HIH
mimmo
On Wednesday, November 7, 2012 3:17:12 PM UTC+1, Alexandru Nedelcu wrote:
Hi,
I'm a
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Dave Ray dave...@gmail.com wrote:
(defn get-records [file-name]
(with-open [r (reader file-name)]
(line-seq r)))
I suspect it's considered more idiomatic to do:
(defn process-records [process file-name]
(with-open [r (reader file-name)]
(doseq
This is exactly the approach I'm taking...'doall' retains the head so
with massive files it will break...'doseq' will not. at least this is my
understanding...
Jim
On 07/11/12 19:25, Sean Corfield wrote:
I suspect it's considered more idiomatic to do:
(defn process-records [process
I am searching for non-trivial type inference example code for a small
language project I am doing
I took this as the basis
https://gist.github.com/997140
and ended up with this
https://github.com/timowest/symbol/blob/master/src/symbol/types.clj
I read some basic papers on Hindley-Milner type
If you don't require the example to be in Clojure, there are some
examples here: http://kanren.sourceforge.net/ under type-inference.scm
and typeclasses.scm.
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Timo Westkämper
timo.westkam...@mysema.com wrote:
I am searching for non-trivial type inference example
Hello,
I have clojure code like:
(gen-class
:name SomeName
:extends SomeSuperClass)
(defn -clojure-fn [this]
(.f this 1)
(.f this string))
and in java there is SomeSuperClass class with overloaded methods, let's
say:
public void f(int a);
public void f(String a);
Is gen-class
or is it dynamically dispatched by JVM?
W dniu środa, 7 listopada 2012 23:43:20 UTC+1 użytkownik Bartosz Krupa
napisał:
Hello,
I have clojure code like:
(gen-class
:name SomeName
:extends SomeSuperClass)
(defn -clojure-fn [this]
(.f this 1)
(.f this string))
and in
Hi Bartek,
In this case, I don't think `gen-class` has any part to play at all. All
`gen-class` does is generate a class with stub methods that dispatch to
Clojure functions by name.
What matters is an expression like `(.f this a)`. If the Clojure compiler
can statically determine the types
On Wednesday, November 7, 2012 2:29:06 PM UTC-5, Jim foo.bar wrote:
This is exactly the approach I'm taking...'doall' retains the head so
with massive files it will break...'doseq' will not. at least this is my
understanding...
That is correct. `doall` retains the head because it returns
Not to toot our own horn, but people have been asking about getting started
with ClojureScript, so here's our contribution, just released in book form:
ClojureScript: Up and Running
by Stuart Sierra and Luke VanderHart
published by O'Reilly in paper, eBook, and Safari
Already bought it weeks ago, like it, it's a concise recipe, right on target.
Disclaimer: I am not a blonde Stuart Sierra groupie :)
Luc P.
Not to toot our own horn, but people have been asking about getting started
with ClojureScript, so here's our contribution, just released in book form:
Is there a list of the special forms that can introduce names (fn*,
let*, catch ...)? (keys clojure.lang.Compiler/specials) gives a list
of all the special forms, but not all of them introduce new bindings.
--
Ben Wolfson
Human kind has used its intelligence to vary the flavour of drinks,
which
That's good to know!
On Tuesday, 6 November 2012 12:48:27 UTC-5, Sean Corfield wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 9:34 AM, JvJ kfjwh...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
There's quite a number of functions like caar, cadr, cadadr, etc. It's
lengthy to do that in clojure with just first and rest.
25 matches
Mail list logo
