Any idea what the possible causes of this problem are? sorry I know its
not much information to work with..
On Wednesday, June 11, 2014 2:34:42 PM UTC-4, Samuel Nelson wrote:
I tested via telnet: telnet 10.10.10.3 5672 and the rabbitMQ server
reports in the log that it accepted the
Hi Mark,
Here's a brief doc on special forms:
http://clojure-doc.org/articles/language/macros.html#special-forms-in-detail
Thanks,
Ambrose
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Mark P pierh...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Tassilo for the explanation - much appreciated!
I have been searching the web
Hi,
FWIW...
On Wednesday, June 18, 2014 5:06:09 AM UTC+2, Sean Corfield wrote:
works for me...
Does *not* work for me. I see the same error inside and outside of
projects:
$ java -version
java version 1.7.0_11
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_11-b21)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit
Someone was having the same issue, solved by upgrading Eastwood plugin to
0.1.2.
Hope that helps.
Thanks,
Ambrose
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Sean Corfield s...@corfield.org wrote:
works for me...
Leiningen 2.4.2; Java build 1.8.0_05-b13; OS X 10.8.5 - lein help new
works fine
Rather upgrading *from* 0.1.2 fixes.
Thanks,
Ambrose
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant
abonnaireserge...@gmail.com wrote:
Someone was having the same issue, solved by upgrading Eastwood plugin to
0.1.2.
Hope that helps.
Thanks,
Ambrose
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014
thanks for the report, fixed
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 1:30 AM, Mike Thompson m.l.thompson...@gmail.com
wrote:
Colin, many thanks. Issue created:
https://github.com/cgrand/sjacket/issues/19
On Wednesday, June 18, 2014 4:08:53 AM UTC+10, Colin Jones wrote:
Yeah the latter version parses as
Oh,
great, yes, that helped. Unexpected.
Thanks,
stefan
On Wednesday, June 18, 2014 11:09:52 AM UTC+2, Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant
wrote:
Rather upgrading *from* 0.1.2 fixes.
Thanks,
Ambrose
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant
abonnair...@gmail.com javascript:
On 18/06/2014 04:05, Sean Corfield wrote:
works for me...
Leiningen 2.4.2; Java build 1.8.0_05-b13; OS X 10.8.5 - lein help new
works fine outside of a project and also inside the context of a
project that depends on Clojure 1.6.0.
Are you running lein inside a project or outside? What do you
On 18/06/2014 04:05, Sean Corfield wrote:
Leiningen 2.4.2; Java build 1.8.0_05-b13; OS X 10.8.5 - lein help new
works fine outside of a project and also inside the context of a
project that depends on Clojure 1.6.0.
Are you running lein inside a project or outside? What do you have in
your
you can also use macroexpand-1 to see how your macro expands
for example, having defined your macro as suggested by Gary and James
above, you can write something like:
(macroexpand-1 '(if-zero (- 4 2 2) (+ 1 1) (+ 2 2)))
and see that it correctly to:
(if (clojure.core/= (- 4 2 2) 0) (+ 1 1) (+
I would say it's not so much about programming paradigm rather than system
calls. It all boils down to how often you would want to read the data.
If it's not more than some times per second, and it's not super important
with timing, you could probably put a reading function in a
I have a method in Ruby that involves 3-level enumeration and would like
to rewrite it in Clojure. Without asking anyone to do the job :), what
is the best equivalent to this kind of Ruby iteration in Clojure? I
looked at prewalk and postwalk but wasn't convinced that was what's
required. Map
Try http://clojuredocs.org/clojure_core/clojure.core/for
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:56 AM, gvim gvi...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a method in Ruby that involves 3-level enumeration and would like
to rewrite it in Clojure. Without asking anyone to do the job :), what is
the best equivalent to
I am using Eastwood 0.1.2 without problems with Leiningen 2.4.2 but perhaps
Stefan and others are seeing conflicts because of other stuff in
~/.lein/profiles.clj with Eastwood?
gvim seems to have isolated it to pulsar.
Nearly all of the problems I see reported with Leiningen end up being due
Recommendation: If you see this problem, and you have Eastwood in your
~/.lein/profiles.clj file, upgrade Eastwood to version 0.1.4, or go back to
Leiningen 2.3.4.
More details:
I have been able to reproduce an exception when running 'lein help new'
outside of any Leiningen project in these
A little more data:
I can reproduce the same thing on Ubuntu 12.04.3 LInux running OpenJDK
1.6.0_31, so there is nothing OS or JVM-specific about this that I can tell.
Also, it happens with the following being the complete contents of my
~/.lein/profiles.clj file:
{:user {:plugins
Is there a way to indicate that a (ClojureScript) protocol is intended to
be used from the host?
Details:
I can define a protocol and an implementation of it in ClojureScript using
defprotocol and reify.
I can also successfully call methods on reified instances returned to the
host (Obj-C
On iOS is advanced compilation really necessary? :simple + :static-fns true
should suffice.
On Wednesday, June 18, 2014, Mike Fikes mikefi...@me.com wrote:
Is there a way to indicate that a (ClojureScript) protocol is intended to
be used from the host?
Details:
I can define a protocol and
'any problem.. fixed.. by another layer of indirection'
You could also just make exportable functions that call the protocols,
keeping them more as impl-details, core.cljs does this, and you gain things
like varargs (hmm, do protocol-varargs work on cljs? nope:
On Monday, June 16, 2014 1:47:14 PM UTC-4, Brian Marick wrote:
We have a small Clojure app on Heroku that performs backend tasks for a
Rails app. Low traffic (like a request a minute). Heap is 400M. We've been
having long (10 sec) GC pauses using both the default and G1 GC (both
untuned).
Even without JIT available in JavaScriptCore, I have been unable to notice
a difference in the on-device performance of the “view controller” code I
have been writing when turning on :advanced.
Thanks for the suggestion, I'll go with :simple and :static-fns. The
reified protocol instance works
Right, Gary,
Initially I simply wrote exported functions.
The motivation for experimenting with protocols is so that I can write a
ClojureScript protocol that mimics, say the iOS UITableViewDataSource
Objective-C @protocol. Then, with that in place, I can write ClojureScript
reifications of
I was just telling a local ios dev there's like five guys using clojure +
objective-c. To me it's impressive. To them, well, I don't know what they'd
think :-).
On Wednesday, June 18, 2014, Mike Fikes mikefi...@me.com wrote:
Right, Gary,
Initially I simply wrote exported functions.
The
That's cool. I see no reason why Clojure / ClojureScript's “reach” can't
extend significantly into iOS.
On Wednesday, June 18, 2014 3:58:18 PM UTC-4, Gary Trakhman wrote:
I was just telling a local ios dev there's like five guys using clojure +
objective-c. To me it's impressive. To them,
Interesting - thanks!
Looks like doing `symbol is a good way of telling whether something is a
special symbol or not. If syntax-quote results in namespace-qualification
it then it *is not* special (with the exception of import*); if it does not
namespace qualify it, then it *is* special.
user= (source special-symbol?)
(defn special-symbol?
Returns true if s names a special form
{:added 1.0
:static true}
[s]
(contains? (. clojure.lang.Compiler specials) s))
nil
user= (keys (. clojure.lang.Compiler specials))
( monitor-exit case* try reify* finally loop* do letfn* if
Wonderful - thanks Andy!
On Thursday, June 19, 2014 12:40:24 PM UTC+9:30, Andy Fingerhut wrote:
user= (source special-symbol?)
(defn special-symbol?
Returns true if s names a special form
{:added 1.0
:static true}
[s]
(contains? (. clojure.lang.Compiler specials) s))
nil
27 matches
Mail list logo
