Points taken.
After rethinking about this, thanks to your feedback, it seems indeed
really wrong to silently automatically override existing Java build paths.
I think I will confine the automatic leiningen conversion only for projects
which do not yet appear to be Java/just projects - those
Hey Alex are you still looking for devs?
Cheers!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To
What would this mean in practice for using the new drag/drop functionality to
open Clojure projects, regardless of origin or history? Would some require an
additional manual step to behave as proper Leiningen projects?
This new functionality has been making life *much* better for me and for
Hello lee,
The drag and drop of projects with a project.clj file should not be
affected :
- if the project already has eclipse metadata (that's what .project and
.classpath files are), then ccw will rely on them and not try to overwrite
them.
- if the project has no eclipse metadata (or no
I would like to announce a very little utility library for defining
recursive maps in Clojure, called rmap.
For example:
(def m
(rmap X
{:what awesome!
:clj (str Clojure is (:what X))})
(:clj m)
;= Clojure is awesome!
An object of type IFn + ILookup + Seqable is currently returned,
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Brian Guthrie btguth...@gmail.com wrote:
But I'm troubled by the idea of accepting channels as arguments, even
though there's a lot to be said for consumer control of buffer sizes (to
say nothing of providing potential fakes for test purposes). In that
Sounds great -- thanks Laurent.
-Lee
On Oct 4, 2014, at 10:24 AM, Laurent PETIT laurent.pe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello lee,
The drag and drop of projects with a project.clj file should not be affected :
- if the project already has eclipse metadata (that's what .project and
.classpath
On Friday, October 3, 2014 2:45:09 PM UTC-4, adrian...@mail.yu.edu wrote:
You can also call (.getNumericValue (.charAt foo 0)) to get the int the
static Character isX methods expect.
Boxing, boxing, boxing! Apparently it did not occur to the Clojure
developers that tight loops sometimes
This looks amazing!
Could you write a blog post explaining in detail your thought process,
what inspired you, and walking through what you have written?
Thanks! This is beautiful! :D
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Arnout Roemers
goo...@company.romeinszoon.nl wrote:
I would like to announce a
At a sort of leisurely pace, but yes, we are. We have quite a few members
of this list on our dev team these days :)
Please reply off list.
--Alex
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Lucas Daniel ldanielmadari...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hey Alex are you still looking for devs?
Cheers!
--
You
Hi,
I am trying to write a function to return a boolean as to whether
parenthesis are balanced or not?
(defn bal-parens? [parens]
(let [replaced (clojure.string/replace parens () )
checked (re-seq #\(\) replaced)]
(println checked)
(if-not (nil? checked) (bal-parens?
A single issue here:
This
(defn bal-parens? [parens]
(let [replaced (clojure.string/replace parens () )
checked (re-seq #\(\) replaced)]
(println checked)
(if-not (nil? checked) (bal-parens? replaced)
(do
(println (str replaced is replaced))
(empty?
Hey,
I just noticed that while recur can be the last statement in most threading
macros,
it can't be used within an `as-` macro.
user= (macroexpand '(- x (recur)))
(recur x)
user= (macroexpand '(as- x % (recur %)))
(let* [% x % (recur %)] %)
This means that a recur within a `as-` will
Thought:
(defmacro as-
[expr name forms]
`(let [~name ~expr
~@(interleave (repeat name) (butlast forms))]
~(last forms)))
On Sunday, October 5, 2014 1:02:50 AM UTC+2, Jan-Paul Bultmann wrote:
Hey,
I just noticed that while recur can be the last
Why would you want this? To leave the value inside the channel for other
consumers?
In that case there would be no guarantee that the value returned by the
peek operation is the next value in the channel, because it might have been
consumed already.
Best regards, Leon
On Monday, September
This issue has been reported
May be you should upvote this..
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-1418
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 4:56 AM, Leon Grapenthin grapenthinl...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thought:
(defmacro as-
[expr name forms]
`(let [~name ~expr
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 1:17 AM, Mayank Jain firesof...@gmail.com wrote:
This looks amazing!
Could you write a blog post explaining in detail your thought process,
what inspired you, and walking through what you have written?
+1 for usage patterns that motivated this...
Thanks! This is
I was thinking in a single-consumer scenario with a buffered chan, in which
you want to check if you can consume the value before effectively consuming
it. As you said, a peek operation has no sense if the channel has multiple
consumers.
Saludos,
Nahuel Greco.
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 9:17 PM,
18 matches
Mail list logo
