Re: How is the emphasis of “data over code” different than the XML advocacy of the early 2000s?

Hi Josh, I am one of the core Onyx developers, so I am biased in some respects. I'm going to only speak to specific advantages that code > data gives Onyx. An advantage with Onyx is the ability to build up your jobs dynamically using data that is easily transformable by code, using all of the

record implementing interface with boolean signature, how to???

Having a bit of a problem implementing the IAtom interface in a record. Specifically, this is the signature giving me grief: boolean compareAndSet(Object oldv, Object newv); This isn't the answer: (^boolean compareAndSet [oldv newv] ... ) I get "Can't define method not in interfaces:

Re: record implementing interface with boolean signature, how to???

Forgot the this parameter. Sorry. Please ignore. :-( On Wednesday, February 3, 2016 at 3:18:34 PM UTC-5, William la Forge wrote: > > Having a bit of a problem implementing the IAtom interface in a record. > Specifically, this is the signature giving me grief: > > boolean compareAndSet(Object

Re: record implementing interface with boolean signature, how to???

Here's the interface I'm overriding: https://github.com/clojure/clojure/blob/master/src/jvm/clojure/lang/IAtom.java And I'm using clojure 1.8.0. Oh. Interesting. I was using cursive for compiling, but switched to boot. Getting some interesting warnings now too: WARNING: Bad method signature

Re: record implementing interface with boolean signature, how to???

On Feb 3, 2016 2:18 PM, "William la Forge" wrote: > > Having a bit of a problem implementing the IAtom interface in a record. Specifically, this is the signature giving me grief: > > boolean compareAndSet(Object oldv, Object newv); > > This isn't the answer: > > (^boolean

Re: record implementing interface with boolean signature, how to???

The hint seems to have no effect. On Wednesday, February 3, 2016 at 3:28:44 PM UTC-5, Gregg Reynolds wrote: > > > On Feb 3, 2016 2:18 PM, "William la Forge" > wrote: > > > > Having a bit of a problem implementing the IAtom interface in a record. > Specifically, this is the

Re: record implementing interface with boolean signature, how to???

you're missing the `this` argument in the argvec. (compareAndSet [this oldv newv] ..) the boolean type hint shoulnd't be necessary. On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 8:18 PM, William la Forge wrote: > Having a bit of a problem implementing the IAtom interface in a record. >

Re: Power function

https://github.com/clojure/math.numeric-tower: - (expt x y) - x to the yth power -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are

Re: How is the emphasis of “data over code” different than the XML advocacy of the early 2000s?

2016-02-03 0:36 GMT+01:00 kovas boguta : > > Out-of-band schemas/assumptions or automagic inference are incidental > complexity to deal with the fact that XML cannot directly represent the > concepts that algorithms want to deal in. This is the point I was making >

Re: How is the emphasis of “data over code” different than the XML advocacy of the early 2000s?

I find this subject interesting as I was just discussing this with a co-worker recently. There's a few points I'd like to make: Firstly, data is often a form of a DSL (domain specific language). Libraries like Onyx often contain (as Lucas mentioned) a parser that walks the data and performs some

Re: How is the emphasis of “data over code” different than the XML advocacy of the early 2000s?

Very good points, Timothy! On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 7:45 AM, Timothy Baldridge wrote: > I find this subject interesting as I was just discussing this with a > co-worker recently. There's a few points I'd like to make: > > Firstly, data is often a form of a DSL (domain

Interact with JVM-based plain Clojure from ClojureCLR

Hello all, I've been using core.logic for some code and I haven't read it's ported on ClojureCLR. However, I would like to use that code as game logic and to rely on Unity game engine for the graphical part. That means I have to use Unity and Clojure together: it can be done through Arcadia[1]…

Re: How is the emphasis of “data over code” different than the XML advocacy of the early 2000s?

and let's not forget codata (e.g. infinite lists) and coprogramming (e.g. web apps). On Feb 1, 2016 4:02 PM, "Josh Tilles" wrote: > As I’m watching Michael Drogalis’s Clojure/Conj 2015 presentation “Onyx: > Distributed Computing for Clojure” >