Hi Leon,
thanks a lot for your explanation that a "regex-op outside of a regex-op
always specs a collection". Then the behaviour is indeed clear
Best regards
Marc
Am Sonntag, 29. Januar 2017 00:32:14 UTC+1 schrieb Leon Grapenthin:
>
> Hi Marc,
>
> note that the return of gen/sample is 10
Hi Marc,
note that the return of gen/sample is 10 examples. Each one is a
collection.
So the collection [] matches your spec, as does [:c]. And so on.
A regex-op outside of a regex-op always specs a collection. If used within
another regex-op, it just specs an element.
To illustrate:
core.logic's CLP(FD) extensions, for finite domains, might also suit your
needs: https://github.com/clojure/core.logic/wiki/Features#clpfd
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
There is a talk by Alex Engelberg about constraint solvers and his clojure
interface to one of them: https://github.com/aengelberg/loco
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AEhULv4ruL4
I'm not quite familiar with it, but maybe it's relevant to your
requirements.
--
You received this message because
Found, thanks!
Francesco
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this
Good afternoon,
like obviously quite a few others on this list I am looking into the
upcoming (and IMHO absolutely great) clojure.spec
During this I noted that the ? macro seems to behave differently from what
I would have naively expected from its documentation (cf.
Looks like you have a dependency issue. Use `lein deps :tree` or the
equivalent command to sort it out.
HTH
David
On Saturday, January 28, 2017, Francesco Bellomi <
francesco.bell...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> first of all, congratulations on this release, it's a huge step ahead.
>
> I'm
Hi,
first of all, congratulations on this release, it's a huge step ahead.
I'm having an issue compiling a program with advanced optimizations, which
worked fine with .293
I get the following exception, any ideas on how can i narrow down the problem
within my source?
Exception in thread
