Re: lein autodoc failed in clojure.java.jdbc

Thanks Alex. so that's also the reason of 404 of https://clojure.github.io/spec.alpha/. Joe On Friday, July 14, 2017 at 12:34:07 PM UTC+8, Alex Miller wrote: > > The Clojure team uses the latest version of autodoc ( > https://github.com/tomfaulhaber/autodoc and >

Re: lein autodoc failed in clojure.java.jdbc

Thanks Sean. Now I know I need to dig into autodoc. On Friday, July 14, 2017 at 10:57:20 AM UTC+8, Sean Corfield wrote: > > I asked Alex Miller about this on Slack and he said (paraphrasing): > > > > Something in clojure.spec broke autodoc a while back and then the split of > spec to

Re: lein autodoc failed in clojure.java.jdbc

The Clojure team uses the latest version of autodoc (https://github.com/tomfaulhaber/autodoc and https://github.com/tomfaulhaber/autodoc-collect are the repos). lein autodoc (https://github.com/tomfaulhaber/lein-autodoc) is hard pegged to autodoc 1.1.1. The official build file for java.jdbc

RE: lein autodoc failed in clojure.java.jdbc

I asked Alex Miller about this on Slack and he said (paraphrasing): Something in clojure.spec broke autodoc a while back and then the split of spec to spec.alpha threw a further wrench in the automated doc generation. That means at least some of the API documentation has been stale for a while

Re: lein autodoc failed in clojure.java.jdbc

hi Sean, The official site of java.jdbc is generated by autodoc, does that mean the clojure team use a different autodoc? please see this. https://clojure.github.io/java.jdbc/ Joe On Thursday, July 13, 2017 at 12:17:45 PM UTC+8, Sean Corfield wrote: > > Autodoc is not declared in

[JOB] Wanted Clojure/Lisp Job

Hi, I am in Sydney Australia, and looking for a job. My current interests and skills/abilities are: - Design and implementation of reusable team libraries using Clojure - Design and implementation of microservices with Restful API using Clojure - Design and

Re: Trouble understanding clojure.spec.alpha/problems :path :via :in

> I'm currently trying something very similar to expound but with a GUI approach to explore errors. I look forward to seeing what you come up with! Ben On Thursday, July 13, 2017 at 8:48:45 AM UTC-6, Juan Monetta wrote: > > Yeah, I read your expound code, really nice btw. > > I'm currently

Re: [ANN] r4f-pro: IDE for visual ontology-based, rule-based and algorithm-based software development

Yup; I'm aware. That's what tipped me off. Didn't see the comment mentioning OWL until I'd already posted, hence the second message. Again, intriguied to look into this further now. On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 2:01 PM, ru wrote: > Christopher! > > OWL is extention of RDF. > >

Re: [ANN] r4f-pro: IDE for visual ontology-based, rule-based and algorithm-based software development

Christopher! OWL is extention of RDF. --Ru четверг, 13 июля 2017 г., 21:21:59 UTC+3 пользователь Christopher Small написал: > > Are these ontologies as in RDF ontologies? > > On Monday, July 10, 2017 at 6:41:32 AM UTC-7, ru wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Update to r4f-pro project:

Re: [ANN] r4f-pro: IDE for visual ontology-based, rule-based and algorithm-based software development

Hah; This answers part of my question (had a tab open, and didn't see the "1 new pending message"). I've been vaguely curious about this project, and didn't realize there was a connection ideas from RDF. I'm interested to learn more now. On Thursday, July 13, 2017 at 9:45:15 AM UTC-7, ru

Re: [ANN] r4f-pro: IDE for visual ontology-based, rule-based and algorithm-based software development

Are these ontologies as in RDF ontologies? On Monday, July 10, 2017 at 6:41:32 AM UTC-7, ru wrote: > > Hi, > > Update to r4f-pro project: https://github.com/rururu/r4f-pro > > Integrated Development Environment for [rete4frames]( > https://github.com/rururu/rete4frames) rule engine and expert

Re: [ANN] r4f-pro: IDE for visual ontology-based, rule-based and algorithm-based software development

Arthur! By the way, I must notice that Protege exists in two flavors: Protege-frames and Protege-OWL. Protege-frames historically precedes Protege-OWL. Protege-OWL theoretically is more powerful, but from practical point of view Protege-frames has more comprehensive application area (not only

Re: Trouble understanding clojure.spec.alpha/problems :path :via :in

Yeah, I read your expound code, really nice btw. I'm currently trying something very similar to expound but with a GUI approach to explore errors. I think encoding map paths as [key pos-in-map-entry] should work in all cases as is currently doing in s/map-of. I can't see any issues if s/keys

Re: Trouble understanding clojure.spec.alpha/problems :path :via :in

No, you're not missing anything. I've run into the same issue. I see you've found the related JIRA issue, but for those who haven't it's https://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-2192 > So the thing is that if you see a problem in [::k 1] you don't know if its the ::k value, or the value is a

Re: [ANN] Onyx 0.10 final release

w00t! Congrats! cheers, Bruce On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 9:53 PM, Michael Drogalis wrote: > We're happy to announce the final release of Onyx 0.10. Onyx is a scalable, > distributed, fault tolerant, high performance data processing platform for > handling batch and streaming