Re: Strange Vector failure

Cora, That's simply amazing. I added one more "or" test: all-false. I confess, I'm not yet at the place where I look at that pattern and recognize it, but, thanks to you and to the other hints I received here, I now have something to work with. Next up for me will be to test the "not"

Re: Strange Vector failure

You can stay away from eval unless you have extremely special needs, really. I never use it myself. The evaluate-or-fns and evaluate-and-fns don't care what the function is, it could be another call to evaluate-or-fns or evaluate-and-fns, and in this way you can recurse as deeply as you desire and

Re: Strange Vector failure

Hello again, Cora (and list!) I have your gist running, then added a new feature https://gist.github.com/KnowledgeGarden/330b4147cd3d4909ef55684fc4c1f00d The first code was for conjunctive lists, I added disjunctive lists There, I started with some? but could not make the grade, ended up with

Re: Strange Vector failure

Ok. I got back to this, now running Cora's gist. It gives me a different place to explore these issues. More soon. Jack On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 5:31 PM Jack Park wrote: > Hi Cora, > > I got dragged away but plan to study your contribution, which I deeply > appreciate. > > My project plans to be

Clojurists Together funding applications are open for Q3 2020

Hi folks You know the drill, Clojurists Together is funding open source Clojure tools, libraries, and documentation. Applications are open until 6th August, 2021, midnight PST. Our members would like us