Re: Is Transit / core.async suitable for remote function invocation?

2014-09-13 Thread Matthias Nehlsen
Sente works really well, I am using it in the Clojure rewrite of an application and I am using it to call functions on the server from the client by putting messages on core.async channels. I am even using it to get around the current limitation on the ClojureScript side that there's no

Re: Is Transit / core.async suitable for remote function invocation?

2014-09-11 Thread Shaun Robinson
Check out Sente. It meets all your requirements. EDN is used as a transport mechanism, with experimental support for Transit -- but these are really implementation details. Values sent from the client shows up in tact on the server, and vice versa. https://github.com/ptaoussanis/sente *

Is Transit / core.async suitable for remote function invocation?

2014-09-09 Thread Mikera
I've encountered a couple of use cases where it would helpful to have some form of remote function invocation in Clojure/ClojureScript with the following characteristics: - Arbitrary functions can be effectively serialised and sent to remote machines - Remote functions can be invoked either